World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
5975
World Ranking
10786
National Ranking
107

Beate Seibt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beate Seibt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 74 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Beate Seibt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beate Seibt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Easier done than undone: asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences.

    Aiden P. Gregg;Beate Seibt;Mahzarin R. Banaji

  • Stereotype Threat and Performance: How Self-Stereotypes Influence Processing by Inducing Regulatory Foci.

    Beate Seibt;Jens Förster

  • 'Would you eat cultured meat?': consumers' reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom

    Wim Verbeke;Afrodita Marcu;Pieter Rutsaert;Rui Gaspar

  • When “Just Say No” is not enough: Affirmation versus negation training and the reduction of automatic stereotype activation☆

    Bertram Gawronski;Roland Deutsch;Sawsan Mbirkou;Beate Seibt

  • Prepared to eat: How immediate affective and motivational responses to food cues are influenced by food deprivation.

    Beate Seibt;Michael Häfner;Roland Deutsch

  • Modulation of facial mimicry by attitudes

    Katja U. Likowski;Andreas Mühlberger;Beate Seibt;Paul Pauli

  • Movement direction or change in distance? Self- and object-related approach–avoidance motions ☆

    Beate Seibt;Roland Neumann;Ravit Nussinson;Fritz Strack

  • Beyond positive or negative

    Rui Gaspar;Cláudia Pedro;Panos Panagiotopoulos;Beate Seibt

  • Attitudes towards people with AIDS and avoidance behavior: Automatic and reflective bases of behavior

    Roland Neumann;Katharina Hülsenbeck;Beate Seibt

  • Analogies, metaphors, and wondering about the future: Lay sense-making around synthetic meat:

    Afrodita Marcu;Rui Gaspar;Pieter Rutsaert;Beate Seibt

  • Empathic Concern Is Part of a More General Communal Emotion.

    Janis Heinrich Zickfeld;Thomas Schubert;Thomas Schubert;Beate Seibt;Beate Seibt;Alan Page Fiske

  • Facial mimicry in its social setting

    Beate Seibt;Andreas Mühlberger;Katja U. Likowski;Peter Weyers

  • Kama muta: Conceptualizing and measuring the experience often labelled being moved across 19 nations and 15 languages.

    Janis Heinrich Zickfeld;Thomas Schubert;Beate Seibt;Johanna Katarina Blomster

  • The Sudden Devotion Emotion: Kama Muta and the Cultural Practices Whose Function Is to Evoke It:

    Alan Page Fiske;Alan Page Fiske;Alan Page Fiske;Beate Seibt;Beate Seibt;Thomas Schubert;Thomas Schubert

  • When hunger finds no fault with moldy corn: food deprivation reduces food-related disgust.

    Atilla Hoefling;Katja U. Likowski;Roland Deutsch;Michael Häfner

  • Moment-to-moment changes in feeling moved match changes in closeness, tears, goosebumps, and warmth: time series analyses

    Thomas W. Schubert;Janis H. Zickfeld;Beate Seibt;Alan Page Fiske

  • The influence of mood on the intensity of emotional responses: Disentangling feeling and knowing

    Roland Neumann;Beate Seibt;Fritz Strack

  • Interpersonal closeness and morality predict feelings of being moved.

    Beate Seibt;Thomas Schubert;Janis Heinrich Zickfeld;Alan Page Fiske

  • Tweeting during food crises: A psychosocial analysis of threat coping expressions in Spain, during the 2011 European EHEC outbreak

    Rui Gaspar;Rui Gaspar;Sara Gorjão;Beate Seibt;Luisa Lima

  • Sad and Lonely? Sad Mood Suppresses Facial Mimicry

    Katja U. Likowski;Peter Weyers;Beate Seibt;Christiane Stöhr

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas W. Schubert
Thomas W. Schubert University of Oslo
Alan Page Fiske
Alan Page Fiske University of California, Los Angeles
Fritz Strack
Fritz Strack University of Würzburg
Julie Barnett
Julie Barnett University of Bath
Wim Verbeke
Wim Verbeke Ghent University
Kees van den Bos
Kees van den Bos Utrecht University
Andreas Mühlberger
Andreas Mühlberger University of Regensburg
Alain Van Hiel
Alain Van Hiel Ghent University
Rachel M. Calogero
Rachel M. Calogero University of Western Ontario
Siegwart Lindenberg
Siegwart Lindenberg University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Beate Seibt

Recently Published Articles