World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
6358
World Ranking
7950
National Ranking
782

Beate Hermelin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beate Hermelin sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Beate Hermelin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Beate Hermelin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Beate Hermelin was affiliated with Goldsmiths University of London in the United Kingdom. Throughout their career, the scientist contributed to the academic community, although specific details regarding research topics, publications, or fields of study are not available.

There are no recorded recent papers authored by Beate Hermelin, and information about frequent co-authors and publication venues has not been documented.

No information is available about book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or main topics covered by their research work.

Details related to awards or recognitions received during their career are not present in the data provided.

Beate Hermelin is deceased, and as such, the profile reflects their career and contributions in the past tense.

Best Publications

  • Psychological Experiments With Autistic Children

    Beate Hermelin;Neil O'Connor

  • The understanding and use of interpersonal gestures by autistic and Down's syndrome children

    Anthony Attwood;Uta Frith;Beate Hermelin

  • Autism and pitch processing: a precursor for savant musical ability?

    Pamela Heaton;Beate Hermelin;Linda Pring

  • Functional asymmetry in the reading of Braille

    Beate Hermelin;N. O'Connor

  • Can children with autistic spectrum disorders perceive affect in music? An experimental investigation.

    Pam F. Heaton;Beate Hermelin;Linda Pring

  • REMEMBERING OF WORDS BY PSYCHOTIC AND SUBNORMAL CHILDREN

    Beate Hermelin;N. O'connor

  • Idiot savant calendrical calculators: rules and regularities

    B. Hermelin;N. O'Connor

  • Bright Splinters of the Mind: A Personal Story of Research with Autistic Savants

    Beate Hermelin;Michael Rutter

  • Seeing and hearing and space and time

    Neil O'Connor;Beate Hermelin

  • Savants, segments, art and autism

    Linda Pring;Beate Hermelin;L. Heavey

  • An exceptional musical memory.

    John A. Sloboda;B. Hermelin;N. O'Connor

  • A pseudo-savant: A case of exceptional musical splinter skills

    Pamela Heaton;Linda Pring;Beate Hermelin

  • Idiot savant calendrical calculators: maths or memory

    N. O'Connor;B. Hermelin

  • Two autistic savant readers

    N. O'Connor;B. Hermelin

  • Phonological coding by the prelinguistically deaf

    B. Dodd;B. Hermelin

  • Visual and graphic abilities of the idiot savant artist.

    N. O'Connor;B. Hermelin

  • THE ROLE OF VISUAL AND MOTOR CUES FOR NORMAL, SUBNORMAL AND AUTISTIC CHILDREN

    Uta Frith;Beate Hermelin

  • A date to remember: the nature of memory in savant calendrical calculators.

    L Heavey;L Pring;B Hermelin

  • THE SELECTIVE VISUAL ATTENTION OF PSYCHOTIC CHILDREN

    N. O'Connor;Beate Hermelin

  • Psychological Studies of Childhood Autism Can Autistic Children Make Sense of What They See and Hear

    Beate Hermelin;Uta Frith

  • Factors and primes : a specific numerical ability

    B. Hermelin;N. O'Connor

Frequent Co-Authors

Laura Crane
Laura Crane University of Birmingham
Uta Frith
Uta Frith University College London
Pamela Heaton
Pamela Heaton Goldsmiths University of London
John A. Sloboda
John A. Sloboda Guildhall School of Music and Drama

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of fulfilling careers, many of which now offer online study options for added flexibility. One of the most rewarding paths is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT). The journey to this career can vary significantly depending on your location and its licensing requirements.

For example, Irving mft education requirements and Jacksonville mft education requirements emphasize earning a relevant graduate degree, accumulating supervised clinical experience, and passing licensing exams. If you're interested in working in the northeast, you can review the specific steps on how to become an mft in Jersey City. Those considering the Midwest can find details on Kansas City mft certification requirements.

Online psychology programs can help you meet these requirements while balancing work or family commitments. Remember that each state has its own regulations, so it’s important to research what’s needed in your specific area as you plan your educational and professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Beate Hermelin

Recently Published Articles