World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
58
Citations
17116
World Ranking
3572
National Ranking
1717

Anthony LaMarca publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony LaMarca sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 142 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Anthony LaMarca D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony LaMarca sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony LaMarca is affiliated with Intel in the United States and conducts research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their scholarly contributions focus on several subfields, including Infectious Diseases, Oncology, Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's research topics encompass:

  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • HIV-related health complications and treatments
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • HIV Research and Treatment
  • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies

Anthony LaMarca has collaborated frequently with other researchers, notably including Onyema Ogbuagu, R. Fuentes Mateos, E. Ruiz Hispán, Paul Benson, and Cynthia Brinson.

Their work has appeared in various publication venues, with the most frequent outlets being:

  • Annals of Oncology
  • New England Journal of Medicine
  • The Lancet HIV
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Geriatric Oncology

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Anthony LaMarca include:

  • "Twice-Yearly Lenacapavir for HIV Prevention in Men and Gender-Diverse Persons," 2024, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Long-term safety and efficacy of emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis: week 96 results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial," 2021, The Lancet HIV
  • "320P First-line therapy (1L) of cisplatin/gemcitabine (CisGem) with pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC): Open-label, single-arm phase II EORTC-1607-GITCG/ABC-09 intergroup study with translational research (TR)," 2025, Annals of Oncology
  • "Safety and Efficacy of Dolutegravir in Treatment-Experienced Subjects With Raltegravir-Resistant HIV Type 1 Infection: 24-Week Results of the VIKING Study," 2020, UNC Libraries
  • "Use of the Rockwood Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) in patients with advanced hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) malignancies," 2021, Journal of Geriatric Oncology

Best Publications

  • Place lab: device positioning using radio beacons in the wild

    Anthony LaMarca;Yatin Chawathe;Sunny Consolvo;Jeffrey Hightower

  • Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden

    Sunny Consolvo;David W. McDonald;Tammy Toscos;Mike Y. Chen

  • The Mobile Sensing Platform: An Embedded Activity Recognition System

    T. Choudhury;S. Consolvo;B. Harrison;J. Hightower

  • Location disclosure to social relations: why, when, & what people want to share

    Sunny Consolvo;Ian E. Smith;Tara Matthews;Anthony LaMarca

  • Accurate GSM indoor localization

    Veljo Otsason;Alex Varshavsky;Anthony LaMarca;Eyal de Lara

  • Accuracy characterization for metropolitan-scale Wi-Fi localization

    Yu-Chung Cheng;Yatin Chawathe;Anthony LaMarca;John Krumm

  • Location information system and method

    David Goldberg;Anthony George Lamarca;David Weiser Mark;Roy Want

  • Flatland: new dimensions in office whiteboards

    Elizabeth D. Mynatt;Takeo Igarashi;W. Keith Edwards;Anthony LaMarca

  • Extending document management systems with user-specific active properties

    Paul Dourish;W. Keith Edwards;Anthony LaMarca;John Lamping

  • Mobility detection using everyday GSM traces

    Timothy Sohn;Alex Varshavsky;Anthony LaMarca;Mike Y. Chen

  • Practical metropolitan-scale positioning for GSM phones

    Mike Y. Chen;Timothy Sohn;Dmitri Chmelev;Dirk Haehnel

  • Learning and recognizing the places we go

    Jeffrey Hightower;Sunny Consolvo;Anthony LaMarca;Ian Smith

  • Presto: an experimental architecture for fluid interactive document spaces

    Paul Dourish;W. Keith Edwards;Anthony LaMarca;Michael Salisbury

  • GSM indoor localization

    Alex Varshavsky;Eyal de Lara;Jeffrey Hightower;Anthony LaMarca

  • Technology for care networks of elders

    S. Consolvo;P. Roessler;B.E. Shelton;A. LaMarca

  • Challenge: ubiquitous location-aware computing and the "place lab" initiative

    Bill N. Schilit;Anthony LaMarca;Gaetano Borriello;William G. Griswold

  • Clustering related files in a document management system

    Anthony LaMarca;James Dourish;Warren Edwards;Michael Salisbury

  • A case study in building layered DHT applications

    Yatin Chawathe;Sriram Ramabhadran;Sylvia Ratnasamy;Anthony LaMarca

  • The influence of caches on the performance of sorting

    Anthony LaMarca;Richard E. Ladner

  • Systems and methods for matching participants to a conversation

    Udi Manber;Chi Chao Chang;Anthony Lamarca

  • The Mobile Sensing Platform: An Embedded Activity Recognition System The MSP is a small wearable device designed for embedded activity recognition with the aim of broadly supporting context-aware ubiquitous computing applications.

    Tanzeem Choudhury;Sunny Consolvo;Beverly Harrison;Jeffrey Hightower

Frequent Co-Authors

Gaetano Borriello
Gaetano Borriello University of Washington
Douglas B. Terry
Douglas B. Terry Amazon Web Services
Sunny Consolvo
Sunny Consolvo Google (United States)
W. Keith Edwards
W. Keith Edwards Georgia Institute of Technology
Alexander Varshavsky
Alexander Varshavsky Google (United States)
Richard E. Ladner
Richard E. Ladner University of Washington
Paul Dourish
Paul Dourish University of California, Irvine
Eyal de Lara
Eyal de Lara University of Toronto
Beverly L. Harrison
Beverly L. Harrison Microsoft (United States)
Takeo Igarashi
Takeo Igarashi University of Tokyo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up a wealth of related opportunities through online education. Many students find that branching into specialized or interdisciplinary fields can expand career options, and online programs offer convenience and affordability.

Interested in law, cybersecurity, or public service? Consider the best online criminal justice degree programs, which provide a strong technical and analytical foundation. For those drawn to business and financial technology, an accounting degree online cheap can complement your CS background and enhance your data-driven decision-making.

As data science continues to grow, earning the cheapest masters in data science online is ideal for building advanced skills in analytics, AI, and machine learning. Alternatively, if you’re interested in tech applications within engineering and construction, a construction management degree online can help bridge the gap between IT and industry operations.

Choosing a related online degree can create more diverse career pathways and add specialized expertise to your Computer Science education.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony LaMarca

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles