World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 41 8824 8574 348 333 137 7459

Eyal de Lara publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eyal de Lara between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eyal de Lara published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2007. 20 of the 171 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2007. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 10 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 8 publications
1981 2025

171 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eyal de Lara: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 3
2000 4
2001 5
2002 2
2003 1
2004 10
2005 6
2006 10
2007 16
2008 4
2009 6
2010 9
2011 9
2012 1
2013 6
2014 2
2015 4
2016 5
2017 7
2018 6
2019 4
2020 7
2021 9
2022 9
2023 4
2024 12
2025 8
Total 171
Download as CSV

Eyal de Lara publications per year - data summary

  • Eyal de Lara, a Computer Science scholar from University of Toronto, has 171 publications recorded across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1981 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2007, with 16 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1981, 1986, 2003 and 2012, with 1 publication each.
  • 16 of the 45 years in the span carry no publications at all (1982, 1983, 1984, 1985 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.9 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 42 publications, 25% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1981-1995: 2 publications (0.1 per year); 1996-2010: 76 publications (5.1 per year); 2011-2025: 93 publications (6.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Eyal de Lara publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eyal de Lara sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 132–141 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 137 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555 137
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Eyal de Lara publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Eyal de Lara, a Computer Science scholar from University of Toronto, records 137 publications - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Eyal de Lara, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Eyal de Lara ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Eyal de Lara D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eyal de Lara sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907 41
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Eyal de Lara D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Eyal de Lara, a Computer Science scholar from University of Toronto, records 41 D-Index - the 40th percentile of the discipline.
  • 40% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Eyal de Lara, and about 60% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Eyal de Lara ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Eyal de Lara is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed extensively to research in computer science and medicine. Their work primarily intersects fields such as computer networks and communications, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, information systems, general health professions, and artificial intelligence.

Their research topics cover a range of areas including:

  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Eyal de Lara has published in various venues, frequently appearing in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Internet Computing
  • 2022 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops and other Affiliated Events (PerCom Workshops)
  • ACM Computing Surveys
  • 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC)

Some notable recent papers include:

  • A Survey on Edge Performance Benchmarking, 2021, ACM Computing Surveys
  • Revisiting Edge AI: Opportunities and Challenges, 2024, IEEE Internet Computing
  • Haggle: Clean-slate networking for mobile devices, 2021, CL Technical Reports
  • Remote COPD Severity and Exacerbation Detection Using Heart Rate and Activity Data Measured from a Wearable Device, 2021, 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC)
  • Enhancing modular application placement in a hierarchical fog computing: A latency and communication cost-sensitive approach, 2024, Computer Communications

Collaborations are an important aspect of their research, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Robert Wu
  • Andrea S. Gershon
  • Salaar Liaqat
  • Daniyal Liaqat
  • Alex Mariakakis

Eyal de Lara's interdisciplinary approach connects computing technologies with health applications, particularly focusing on chronic respiratory diseases and wearable health monitoring systems. This bridging of computer science and medicine reflects a diverse portfolio spanning technical innovation and applied healthcare research.

Best Publications

  • Accurate GSM indoor localization

    Veljo Otsason;Alex Varshavsky;Anthony LaMarca;Eyal de Lara

  • SnowFlock: rapid virtual machine cloning for cloud computing

    Horacio Andrés Lagar-Cavilla;Joseph Andrew Whitney;Adin Matthew Scannell;Philip Patchin

  • Mobility detection using everyday GSM traces

    Timothy Sohn;Alex Varshavsky;Anthony LaMarca;Mike Y. Chen

  • GSM indoor localization

    Alex Varshavsky;Eyal de Lara;Jeffrey Hightower;Anthony LaMarca

  • Haggle: seamless networking for mobile applications

    Jing Su;James Scott;Pan Hui;Jon Crowcroft

  • The taser intrusion recovery system

    Ashvin Goel;Kenneth Po;Kamran Farhadi;Zheng Li

  • Are GSM Phones THE Solution for Localization

    A. Varshavsky;Mike Y. Chen;E. de Lara;J. Froehlich

  • Amigo: proximity-based authentication of mobile devices

    Alex Varshavsky;Adin Scannell;Anthony LaMarca;Eyal De Lara

  • Exploiting social interactions in mobile systems

    Andrew G. Miklas;Kiran K. Gollu;Kelvin K. W. Chan;Stefan Saroiu

  • Puppeteer: Component-based adaptation for mobile computing

    Eyal De Lara;Dan S. Wallach;Willy Zwaenepoel

  • User mobility for opportunistic ad-hoc networking

    Unknown

  • VMM-independent graphics acceleration

    H. Andres Lagar-Cavilla;Niraj Tolia;M. Satyanarayanan;Eyal de Lara

  • The SkyLoc Floor Localization System

    A. Varshavsky;A. LaMarca;J. Hightower;E. de Lara

  • A preliminary investigation of worm infections in a bluetooth environment

    Jing Su;Kelvin K. W. Chan;Andrew G. Miklas;Kenneth Po

  • Ensemble: cooperative proximity-based authentication

    Andre Kalamandeen;Adin Scannell;Eyal de Lara;Anmol Sheth

  • Timbremap: enabling the visually-impaired to use maps on touch-enabled devices

    Jing Su;Alyssa Rosenzweig;Ashvin Goel;Eyal de Lara

  • Efficient and transparent dynamic content updates for mobile clients

    Trevor Armstrong;Olivier Trescases;Cristiana Amza;Eyal de Lara

  • Protecting Data on Smartphones and Tablets from Memory Attacks

    Patrick Colp;Jiawen Zhang;James Gleeson;Sahil Suneja

  • Disconnected operation in publish/subscribe middleware

    I. Burcea;H.-A. Jacobsen;E. de Lara;V. Muthusamy

  • Location-Based Services

    Anind Dey;Jeffrey Hightower;Eyal de Lara;Nigel Davies

  • A cross-layer approach to service discovery and selection in MANETs

    A. Varshavsky;B. Reid;E. de Lara

Frequent Co-Authors

Willy Zwaenepoel
Willy Zwaenepoel University of Sydney
Mahadev Satyanarayanan
Mahadev Satyanarayanan Carnegie Mellon University
Dan S. Wallach
Dan S. Wallach Rice University
Frank Rudzicz
Frank Rudzicz University of Toronto
Anthony LaMarca
Anthony LaMarca Intel (United States)
Alexander Varshavsky
Alexander Varshavsky Google (United States)
Stefan Saroiu
Stefan Saroiu Microsoft (United States)
Weisong Shi
Weisong Shi Wayne State University
Khai N. Truong
Khai N. Truong University of Toronto
Michael Brudno
Michael Brudno University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Computer Science opens the door to many flexible and affordable pathways. Many students are seeking cheap online degrees fast to start their careers sooner and minimize costs. Accelerated programs help motivated learners complete degrees in less time—find out more with the computer science accelerated program options available across the US.

Even if your academic background isn't perfect, opportunities still exist. Look for online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa, which offer a second chance to pursue advanced studies and boost your career potential.

Graduates in computer science can work in many sectors, and interdisciplinary degrees expand these possibilities even further. For those interested in the intersection of technology and environmental impact, consider exploring jobs for environmental science majors that blend computing and sustainability.

With these online pathways, you can align your education to your goals, timeline, and budget while preparing for a successful tech-driven career.

Best Scientists Citing Eyal de Lara

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles