World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 104 7070 6645 687 655 308 38238

Ann Rumley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ann Rumley between 1978 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ann Rumley published across 49 years, from 1978 to 2026, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 1996. 1 of the 311 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 1996. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 15 publications 1996: 19 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 0 publications 2026: 1 publication
1978 2026

311 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ann Rumley: publications per year, 1978 to 2026
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 1
1991 1
1992 3
1993 7
1994 6
1995 15
1996 19
1997 10
1998 8
1999 14
2000 11
2001 15
2002 16
2003 14
2004 13
2005 15
2006 9
2007 18
2008 16
2009 17
2010 19
2011 15
2012 8
2013 10
2014 9
2015 4
2016 8
2017 2
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
2021 0
2022 3
2023 0
2024 0
2025 0
2026 1
Total 311
Download as CSV

Ann Rumley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Rumley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 308 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834 308
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ann Rumley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Rumley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513 104
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ann Rumley is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their primary research focus lies within the field of Medicine, particularly emphasizing Internal Medicine, Hematology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's recent publications address key areas in hematological variables, cardiovascular disease, and mortality. These include:

  • Haematological variables and risk of future venous thromboembolism in the British Regional Heart Study on men. Combined D-dimer and APTT as a predictive test for thromboembolism? (2022, British Journal of Haematology)
  • Associations of Hemostatic Variables with Cardiovascular Disease and Total Mortality: The Glasgow MONICA Study (2022, TH Open)
  • Associations of Hemostatic Variables with Cardiovascular Disease and Total Mortality: The Glasgow MONICA Study (2022, TH Open)

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Blood properties and coagulation

Ann Rumley has collaborated frequently with the following coauthors:

  • Gordon Lowe
  • Sanne A. E. Peters
  • Hugh Tunstall-Pedoe
  • Mark Woodward
  • S. Goya Wannamethee

Their work has appeared predominantly in the journals TH Open and British Journal of Haematology, with the scientist having multiple publications in each venue.

Best Publications

  • C-Reactive Protein and Other Circulating Markers of Inflammation in the Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease

    John Danesh;Jeremy G Wheeler;Gideon M Hirschfield;Shinichi Eda

  • Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 as an Independent Predictor of Coronary Heart Disease

    Chris J. Packard;Denis S. J. O'reilly;Muriel J. Caslake;Alex D. Mcmahon

  • Carotid Plaque, Intima Media Thickness, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, and Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease in Men and Women: The British Regional Heart Study

    Shah Ebrahim;Olia Papacosta;Peter Whincup;Goya Wannamethee

  • Long-term interleukin-6 levels and subsequent risk of coronary heart disease: two new prospective studies and a systematic review.

    John Danesh;Stephen Kaptoge;Andrea G Mann;Nadeem Sarwar

  • Inflammatory Cytokines and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: New Prospective Study and Updated Meta-Analysis

    Stephen Kaptoge;Sreenivasa Rao Kondapally Seshasai;Pei Gao;Daniel F Freitag

  • Adrenocortical, Autonomic, and Inflammatory Causes of the Metabolic Syndrome Nested Case-Control Study

    E.J. Brunner;H. Hemingway;B.R. Walker;M. Page

  • Blood viscosity and risk of cardiovascular events: the Edinburgh Artery Study

    G. D. O. Lowe;A. J. Lee;A. Rumley;J. F. Price

  • Physical Activity and Hemostatic and Inflammatory Variables in Elderly Men

    S. Goya Wannamethee;Gordon D.O. Lowe;Peter H. Whincup;Ann Rumley

  • Associations of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 with cognitive symptoms of depression: 12-year follow-up of the Whitehall II study.

    D. Gimeno;M. Kivimäki;E. J. Brunner;M. Elovainio

  • C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin-6, and Soluble Adhesion Molecules as Predictors of Progressive Peripheral Atherosclerosis in the General Population Edinburgh Artery Study

    Ioanna Tzoulaki;Gordon D. Murray;Amanda J. Lee;Ann Rumley

  • Associations between cigarette smoking, pipe/cigar smoking, and smoking cessation, and haemostatic and inflammatory markers for cardiovascular disease

    S. Goya Wannamethee;Gordon D.O. Lowe;A. Gerald Shaper;Ann Rumley

  • Interleukin-6 Gene −174G>C and −572G>C Promoter Polymorphisms Are Strong Predictors of Plasma Interleukin-6 Levels After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

    D.J. Brull;H.E. Montgomery;J. Sanders;S. Dhamrait

  • Relationship between smoking and cardiovascular risk factors in the development of peripheral arterial disease and coronary artery disease: Edinburgh Artery Study.

    J.F. Price;P.I. Mowbray;A.J. Lee;A. Rumley

  • Hemostatic factors as predictors of ischemic heart disease and stroke in the Edinburgh Artery Study.

    F. B. Smith;A. J. Lee;F. G. R. Fowkes;J. F. Price

  • Fibrin D-dimer and coronary heart disease : Prospective study and meta-analysis

    John Danesh;Peter Whincup;Mary Walker;Lucy Lennon

  • Novel Associations of Multiple Genetic Loci With Plasma Levels of Factor VII, Factor VIII, and von Willebrand Factor The CHARGE (Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genome Epidemiology) Consortium

    Nicholas L. Smith;Ming Huei Chen;Abbas Dehghan;David P. Strachan

  • C-reactive protein and its role in metabolic syndrome: mendelian randomisation study

    Nicholas John Timpson;Debbie A Lawlor;Roger M. Harbord;Tom R Gaunt

  • Associations of vitamin C status, fruit and vegetable intakes, and markers of inflammation and hemostasis

    S Goya Wannamethee;Gordon D O Lowe;Ann Rumley;K Richard Bruckdorfer

  • Lipoprotein(a) levels and risk of future coronary heart disease: large-scale prospective data.

    Anna Bennet;Emanuele Di Angelantonio;Sebhat Erqou;Gudny Eiriksdottir

  • Cardiovascular risk factors, including thrombotic variables, in a population with rheumatoid arthritis.

    A. McEntegart;H. A. Capell;D. Creran;A. G. Rumley

Frequent Co-Authors

Gordon D.O. Lowe
Gordon D.O. Lowe University of Glasgow
Mark Woodward
Mark Woodward Imperial College London
Naveed Sattar
Naveed Sattar University of Glasgow
Peter H. Whincup
Peter H. Whincup St George's, University of London
Amanda J. Lee
Amanda J. Lee University of Aberdeen
David J. Stott
David J. Stott University of Glasgow
Paul Welsh
Paul Welsh University of Glasgow
Ian J. Deary
Ian J. Deary University of Edinburgh
Joanna M. Wardlaw
Joanna M. Wardlaw University of Edinburgh
Debbie A. Lawlor
Debbie A. Lawlor University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in healthcare can provide additional flexibility and accessible career options. For those interested in nursing, choosing an easiest bsn program to get into is a valuable option for students who want to jumpstart their healthcare journey with less competitive admissions.

If direct patient care is not your focus, consider the growing field of medical billing and coding. There are medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa, making it financially easier to enter administrative roles in healthcare.

For those concerned about entrance exams, finding a nursing school without teas test requirements can remove a common barrier and enable quicker access to nursing programs online.

Alternatively, if you are interested in leadership or management, the best online healthcare administration degree programs offer accelerated pathways for future healthcare administrators and executives. These flexible degrees can lead to a wide range of non-clinical career opportunities in the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Ann Rumley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles