World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 16038 8070 129 26697

Ann E. Kelley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ann E. Kelley between 1978 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ann E. Kelley published across 49 years, from 1978 to 2026, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2004. 2 of the 143 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2004. 1978: 3 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 11 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
1978 2026

143 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ann E. Kelley: publications per year, 1978 to 2026
Year Publications
1978 3
1979 2
1980 0
1981 0
1982 2
1983 2
1984 0
1985 1
1986 2
1987 1
1988 4
1989 5
1990 3
1991 4
1992 4
1993 2
1994 6
1995 3
1996 1
1997 11
1998 3
1999 5
2000 4
2001 4
2002 9
2003 6
2004 16
2005 13
2006 6
2007 6
2008 3
2009 1
2010 3
2011 1
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 3
2024 2
2025 1
2026 1
Total 143
Download as CSV

Ann E. Kelley publications per year - data summary

  • Ann E. Kelley, a Medicine scholar from University of Wisconsin–Madison, has 143 publications recorded across 49 years, from 1978 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1978 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2004, with 16 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1985, 1987, 1996, 2009 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 14 of the 49 years in the span carry no publications at all (1980, 1981, 1984, 2012 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.1 per year counting only the 35 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 7 publications, 5% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1978-1994: 41 publications (2.4 per year); 1995-2011: 95 publications (5.6 per year); 2012-2026: 7 publications (0.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Ann E. Kelley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann E. Kelley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 129 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26 129
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ann E. Kelley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Ann E. Kelley, a Medicine scholar from University of Wisconsin–Madison, records 129 publications - the 1st percentile of the discipline.
  • 1% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Ann E. Kelley, and about 99% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Ann E. Kelley ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Ann E. Kelley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann E. Kelley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Ann E. Kelley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Ann E. Kelley, a Medicine scholar from University of Wisconsin–Madison, records 82 D-Index - the 21st percentile of the discipline.
  • 21% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Ann E. Kelley, and about 79% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Ann E. Kelley ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Ann E. Kelley was affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research contributions were primarily in the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on several subfields and topics related to reproductive health, artificial intelligence, and mental health.

The main fields of study encompassed Medicine with significant work in the following subfields:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Their research topics included:

  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Ann E. Kelley had a number of frequent coauthors, often collaborating with these scholars:

  • David Cronkite
  • Jennifer Covey
  • Onchee Yu
  • Jacob Christ
  • Renate Schulze-Rath

Their published work appeared in several venues, including:

  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Journal of Women's Health
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • The Permanente Journal

Notable papers authored or coauthored by them include:

  • "Incidence, prevalence, and trends in polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosis: a United States population-based study from 2006 to 2019" (2023), published in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • "Data-driven automated classification algorithms for acute health conditions: applying PheNorm to COVID-19 disease" (2023), published in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • "Risk Factors for Incident Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Diagnosis" (2024), published in Journal of Women's Health
  • "The Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) Medical Records Abstraction Project: A resource for research on the aging brain and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias" (2023), published in Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Protocol for Designing a Model to Predict the Likelihood of Psychosis From Electronic Health Records Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning" (2024), published in The Permanente Journal

Their scholarly output addressed diverse areas within healthcare and computational methods, including the study of ovarian disorders, application of machine learning to health conditions, and the use of natural language processing to predict psychiatric outcomes. The publications spanned from 2023 to 2024 and covered both clinical and methodological advances.

Best Publications

  • Methylphenidate Preferentially Increases Catecholamine Neurotransmission within the Prefrontal Cortex at Low Doses that Enhance Cognitive Function

    Craig W. Berridge;David M. Devilbiss;Matthew E. Andrzejewski;Amy F.T. Arnsten

  • Induction of oral stereotypy following amphetamine microinjection into a discrete subregion of the striatum.

    Ann E. Kelley;Christopher G. Lang;Andrea M. Gauthier

  • The Primate Amygdala Mediates Acute Fear But Not the Behavioral and Physiological Components of Anxious Temperament

    Ned H. Kalin;Steven E. Shelton;Richard J. Davidson;Ann E. Kelley

  • Effects of lesions to amygdala, ventral subiculum, medial prefrontal cortex, and nucleus accumbens on the reaction to novelty: implication for limbic-striatal interactions

    L H Burns;L Annett;A E Kelley;B J Everitt

  • Dopamine and conditioned reinforcement. I. Differential effects of amphetamine microinjections into striatal subregions.

    Ann E. Kelley;Jill M. Delfs

  • Glutamate-dopamine interactions in the ventral striatum : role in locomotor activity and responding with conditioned reinforcement

    Lindsay H. Burns;Barry J. Everitt;Ann E. Kelley;Trevor W. Robbins

  • Amphetamine microinjections into distinct striatal subregions cause dissociable effects on motor and ingestive behavior.

    Ann E. Kelley;Andrea M. Gauthier;Christopher G. Lang

  • Opiate infusion into nucleus accumbens: contrasting effects on motor activity and responding for conditioned reward.

    S T Cunningham;A E Kelley

  • Increased spontaneous activity following substance P infusion into A10 dopaminergic area.

    Louis Stinus;Ann E. Kelley;Susan D. Iversen

  • Locus coeruleus lesions: learning and extinction.

    George F. Koob;Ann E. Kelley;Stephen T. Mason

  • Cholinergic stimulation of the ventrolateral striatum elicits mouth movements in rats: pharmacological and regional specificity.

    A. E. Kelley;V. P. Bakshi;J. M. Delfs;C. G. Lang

  • NMDA receptors mediate the behavioral effects of amphetamine infused into the nucleus accumbens.

    A.E. Kelley;L.C. Throne

  • Effects of peripheral and central dopamine blockade on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation: evidence for both reward and motor deficits.

    James R. Stellar;Ann E. Kelley;Dale Corbett

  • Behavioral activation induced in the rat by substance P infusion into ventral tegmental area: Implication of dopaminergic A10 neurones

    Ann E. Kelley;Ann E. Kelley;Louis Stinus;Louis Stinus;Susan D. Iversen;Susan D. Iversen

  • Substance P, neurotensin and enkephalin injections into the ventral tegmental area: comparative study on dopamine turnover in several forebrain structures

    M. Cador;Jean-Michel Rivet;A.E. Kelley;M. Le Moal

  • Striatal regulation of morphine-induced hyperphagia: an anatomical mapping study.

    Vaishali P. Bakshi;Ann E. Kelley

  • Ventral tegmental area infusion of substance P, neurotensin and enkephalin: differential effects on feeding behavior.

    M. Cador;A.E. Kelley;M. Le Moal;L. Stinus

  • Dopaminergic regulation of feeding behavior: II. Differential effects of amphetamine microinfusion into three striatal subregions

    V. P. Bakshi;A. E. Kelley

  • Effects of GBR 12909, a selective dopamine uptake inhibitor, on motor activity and operant behavior in the rat.

    Ann E. Kelley;Christopher G. Lang

  • Behavioural response to bilateral injections of substance P into the substantia nigra of the rat

    Ann E. Kelley;Susan D. Iversen

Frequent Co-Authors

Martine Cador
Martine Cador University of Bordeaux
Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
Dale Corbett
Dale Corbett University of Ottawa
Barry J. Everitt
Barry J. Everitt University of Cambridge
M. Le Moal
M. Le Moal University of Bordeaux

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degree options and career pathways within healthcare. For those interested in the management side of healthcare, pursuing health administration degrees online can be an excellent alternative. These programs prepare students for leadership roles in a growing sector while offering flexibility and accessibility.

The cost of advanced degrees is a key consideration for many students. Exploring the cost of mha degree options can help applicants find affordable, reputable programs tailored to their financial needs. Similarly, students considering nursing can look into the best online dnp programs to achieve the highest level of education in nursing without sacrificing their current work commitments.

Pharmacy is another vital healthcare field with flexible online study options. Pursuing an online pharmacy degree can help students become highly skilled pharmacists ready for modern healthcare challenges. Exploring these related online degrees and career pathways allows you to tailor your education and professional future to your interests and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Ann E. Kelley

Recently Published Articles