World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
26697
World Ranking
16039
National Ranking
8071

Ann E. Kelley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann E. Kelley sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 129 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ann E. Kelley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann E. Kelley sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ann E. Kelley was affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research contributions were primarily in the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on several subfields and topics related to reproductive health, artificial intelligence, and mental health.

The main fields of study encompassed Medicine with significant work in the following subfields:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Their research topics included:

  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Ann E. Kelley had a number of frequent coauthors, often collaborating with these scholars:

  • David Cronkite
  • Jennifer Covey
  • Onchee Yu
  • Jacob Christ
  • Renate Schulze-Rath

Their published work appeared in several venues, including:

  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Journal of Women's Health
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • The Permanente Journal

Notable papers authored or coauthored by them include:

  • "Incidence, prevalence, and trends in polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosis: a United States population-based study from 2006 to 2019" (2023), published in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • "Data-driven automated classification algorithms for acute health conditions: applying PheNorm to COVID-19 disease" (2023), published in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • "Risk Factors for Incident Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Diagnosis" (2024), published in Journal of Women's Health
  • "The Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) Medical Records Abstraction Project: A resource for research on the aging brain and Alzheimer's disease and related dementias" (2023), published in Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Protocol for Designing a Model to Predict the Likelihood of Psychosis From Electronic Health Records Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning" (2024), published in The Permanente Journal

Their scholarly output addressed diverse areas within healthcare and computational methods, including the study of ovarian disorders, application of machine learning to health conditions, and the use of natural language processing to predict psychiatric outcomes. The publications spanned from 2023 to 2024 and covered both clinical and methodological advances.

Best Publications

  • Methylphenidate Preferentially Increases Catecholamine Neurotransmission within the Prefrontal Cortex at Low Doses that Enhance Cognitive Function

    Craig W. Berridge;David M. Devilbiss;Matthew E. Andrzejewski;Amy F.T. Arnsten

  • Induction of oral stereotypy following amphetamine microinjection into a discrete subregion of the striatum.

    Ann E. Kelley;Christopher G. Lang;Andrea M. Gauthier

  • The Primate Amygdala Mediates Acute Fear But Not the Behavioral and Physiological Components of Anxious Temperament

    Ned H. Kalin;Steven E. Shelton;Richard J. Davidson;Ann E. Kelley

  • Effects of lesions to amygdala, ventral subiculum, medial prefrontal cortex, and nucleus accumbens on the reaction to novelty: implication for limbic-striatal interactions

    L H Burns;L Annett;A E Kelley;B J Everitt

  • Dopamine and conditioned reinforcement. I. Differential effects of amphetamine microinjections into striatal subregions.

    Ann E. Kelley;Jill M. Delfs

  • Glutamate-dopamine interactions in the ventral striatum : role in locomotor activity and responding with conditioned reinforcement

    Lindsay H. Burns;Barry J. Everitt;Ann E. Kelley;Trevor W. Robbins

  • Amphetamine microinjections into distinct striatal subregions cause dissociable effects on motor and ingestive behavior.

    Ann E. Kelley;Andrea M. Gauthier;Christopher G. Lang

  • Opiate infusion into nucleus accumbens: contrasting effects on motor activity and responding for conditioned reward.

    S T Cunningham;A E Kelley

  • Increased spontaneous activity following substance P infusion into A10 dopaminergic area.

    Louis Stinus;Ann E. Kelley;Susan D. Iversen

  • Locus coeruleus lesions: learning and extinction.

    George F. Koob;Ann E. Kelley;Stephen T. Mason

  • Cholinergic stimulation of the ventrolateral striatum elicits mouth movements in rats: pharmacological and regional specificity.

    A. E. Kelley;V. P. Bakshi;J. M. Delfs;C. G. Lang

  • NMDA receptors mediate the behavioral effects of amphetamine infused into the nucleus accumbens.

    A.E. Kelley;L.C. Throne

  • Effects of peripheral and central dopamine blockade on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation: evidence for both reward and motor deficits.

    James R. Stellar;Ann E. Kelley;Dale Corbett

  • Behavioral activation induced in the rat by substance P infusion into ventral tegmental area: Implication of dopaminergic A10 neurones

    Ann E. Kelley;Ann E. Kelley;Louis Stinus;Louis Stinus;Susan D. Iversen;Susan D. Iversen

  • Substance P, neurotensin and enkephalin injections into the ventral tegmental area: comparative study on dopamine turnover in several forebrain structures

    M. Cador;Jean-Michel Rivet;A.E. Kelley;M. Le Moal

  • Striatal regulation of morphine-induced hyperphagia: an anatomical mapping study.

    Vaishali P. Bakshi;Ann E. Kelley

  • Ventral tegmental area infusion of substance P, neurotensin and enkephalin: differential effects on feeding behavior.

    M. Cador;A.E. Kelley;M. Le Moal;L. Stinus

  • Dopaminergic regulation of feeding behavior: II. Differential effects of amphetamine microinfusion into three striatal subregions

    V. P. Bakshi;A. E. Kelley

  • Effects of GBR 12909, a selective dopamine uptake inhibitor, on motor activity and operant behavior in the rat.

    Ann E. Kelley;Christopher G. Lang

  • Behavioural response to bilateral injections of substance P into the substantia nigra of the rat

    Ann E. Kelley;Susan D. Iversen

Frequent Co-Authors

Martine Cador
Martine Cador University of Bordeaux
Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
Dale Corbett
Dale Corbett University of Ottawa
Barry J. Everitt
Barry J. Everitt University of Cambridge
M. Le Moal
M. Le Moal University of Bordeaux

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degree options and career pathways within healthcare. For those interested in the management side of healthcare, pursuing health administration degrees online can be an excellent alternative. These programs prepare students for leadership roles in a growing sector while offering flexibility and accessibility.

The cost of advanced degrees is a key consideration for many students. Exploring the cost of mha degree options can help applicants find affordable, reputable programs tailored to their financial needs. Similarly, students considering nursing can look into the best online dnp programs to achieve the highest level of education in nursing without sacrificing their current work commitments.

Pharmacy is another vital healthcare field with flexible online study options. Pursuing an online pharmacy degree can help students become highly skilled pharmacists ready for modern healthcare challenges. Exploring these related online degrees and career pathways allows you to tailor your education and professional future to your interests and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Ann E. Kelley

Recently Published Articles