World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8145 7604 802 766 98 8296

Andrew Prestwich publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew Prestwich between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew Prestwich published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2017. 15 of the 114 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2017. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 4 publications
2003 2025

114 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew Prestwich: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 0
2005 1
2006 2
2007 6
2008 5
2009 3
2010 3
2011 5
2012 3
2013 5
2014 6
2015 4
2016 9
2017 19
2018 4
2019 5
2020 3
2021 8
2022 3
2023 3
2024 11
2025 4
Total 114
Download as CSV

Andrew Prestwich publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Prestwich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 98 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 98
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew Prestwich D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Prestwich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew Prestwich is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their primary field of study is psychology, with a strong emphasis on experimental and cognitive psychology. Their research also spans several related subfields, including general health professions, applied psychology, social psychology, and clinical psychology.

Their published work covers a range of topics, notably behavioral health and interventions, mental health research topics, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. Other themes include motivation and self-concept in sports, sleep and related disorders, health policy implementation science, and evolutionary psychology and human behavior.

Prestwich has contributed to multiple academic venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Psychology and Health
  • SSM Annual Scientific Meeting
  • Health Psychology Review
  • Health Psychology
  • UNC Libraries

Their collaboration network includes coauthors with whom they have published multiple times, such as:

  • Daryl B. O'Connor
  • Mark Conner
  • Ridda Ali
  • Mark S. Gilthorpe
  • Nikos Ntoumanis

Selected recent papers by Andrew Prestwich demonstrate their involvement in health psychology and behavioral science research. These include:

  • "A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health," 2020, Health Psychology Review
  • "The association between worry and rumination with sleep in non-clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis," 2020, Health Psychology Review
  • "Health effects of psychological interventions for worry and rumination: A meta-analysis," 2021, Health Psychology
  • "Do socio-structural factors moderate the effects of health cognitions on COVID-19 protection behaviours?" 2021, Social Science & Medicine
  • "Investigating which behaviour change techniques work for whom in which contexts delivered by what means: Proposal for an international collaboratory of Centres for Understanding Behaviour Change (CUBiC)," 2020, British Journal of Health Psychology

Best Publications

  • Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme.

    Susan Michie;Andrew Prestwich

  • Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis

    Andrew Prestwich;Falko F. Sniehotta;Craig Whittington;Stephan U. Dombrowski

  • Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence.

    Benjamin Harkin;Thomas L. Webb;Betty P. I. Chang;Andrew Prestwich

  • The TIPPME intervention typology for changing environments to change behaviour

    Gareth J. Hollands;Giacomo Bignardi;Marie Johnston;Michael P. Kelly

  • The use of implementation intentions and the decision balance sheet in promoting exercise behaviour

    Andrew Prestwich;Rebecca Lawton;Mark Conner

  • Using aversive images to enhance healthy food choices and implicit attitudes: An experimental test of evaluative conditioning.

    Gareth J. Hollands;Andrew Prestwich;Theresa M. Marteau

  • Using theory to develop and test interventions to promote changes in health behaviour: evidence, issues, and recommendations

    Andrew Prestwich;Thomas L Webb;Mark Conner

  • Can implementation intentions and text messages promote brisk walking? A randomized trial.

    Andrew Prestwich;Marco Perugini;Robert Hurling

  • Interventions to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages or increase water intake: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    E.J. Vargas-Garcia;C.E.L. Evans;A. Prestwich;B.J. Sykes-Muskett

  • How can self-efficacy be increased? Meta-analysis of dietary interventions

    Andrew Prestwich;Ian Kellar;Richard Parker;Siobhan MacRae

  • Relations Between Implicit and Explicit Measures of Attitudes and Measures of Behavior: Evidence of Moderation by Individual Difference Variables

    Mark T. Conner;Marco Perugini;Rick O'Gorman;Karen Ayres

  • Can the effects of implementation intentions on exercise be enhanced using text messages

    AJ Prestwich;M Perugini;R Hurling

  • The IAT as a predictor of food choice: The case of fruits versus snacks

    Juliette Richetin;Marco Perugini;Andrew Prestwich;Rick O'Gorman

  • Dyadic interventions to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour: systematic review and meta-analysis

    R. Carr;A. Prestwich;Dominika Kwasnicka;Cecilie Thogersen-Ntoumani

  • Randomized controlled trial of collaborative implementation intentions targeting working adults' physical activity.

    Andrew Prestwich;Mark T. Conner;Rebecca J. Lawton;Jane K. Ward

  • Goal desires moderate intention-behaviour relations.

    Andrew Prestwich;Marco Perugini;Robert Hurling

  • The association between worry and rumination with sleep in non-clinical populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    F Clancy;A Prestwich;L Caperon;A Tsipa;A Tsipa

  • Individual and collaborative implementation intentions and the promotion of breast self-examination

    Andrew Prestwich;Mark Conner;Rebecca Lawton;Wendy Bailey

  • Differential relations between two types of contact and implicit and explicit racial attitudes.

    Andrew Prestwich;Jared B. Kenworthy;Michelle Wilson;Natasha Kwan-Tat

  • Do brief online planning interventions increase physical activity amongst university students? A randomised controlled trial

    Silje Skår;Falko F Sniehotta;Gerard J Molloy;Andrew Prestwich

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Conner
Mark Conner University of Leeds
Rebecca Lawton
Rebecca Lawton University of Leeds
Marco Perugini
Marco Perugini University of Milano-Bicocca
Marie Johnston
Marie Johnston University of Aberdeen
Theresa M. Marteau
Theresa M. Marteau University of Cambridge
Daryl B. O'Connor
Daryl B. O'Connor University of Leeds
Mark Petticrew
Mark Petticrew London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Stephen Sutton
Stephen Sutton University of Cambridge
David Ogilvie
David Ogilvie University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers, many of which you can prepare for through online study. Popular options include becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) or a mental health counselor. Each path has unique educational requirements and licensure standards, which can vary by location.

For example, the journey to becoming a BCBA involves specialized coursework and supervised experience. If you're interested in local requirements, take a look at the Wichita bcba education requirements or the Winston Salem bcba requirements for more details.

If counseling is your chosen path, you'll find a variety of online degree programs that can help you meet the necessary credentials. You can review the process to become a mental health counselor in Albuquerque or learn what's required to become a mental health counselor in Anaheim.

No matter your career goals, exploring these educational pathways can help you make informed decisions about your future in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Prestwich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles