World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
32
Citations
11184
World Ranking
9484
National Ranking
80

Amos Arieli publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amos Arieli sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 67 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Amos Arieli D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amos Arieli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amos Arieli is affiliated with the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel. Their primary research expertise lies in the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. The subfields of their work also include clinical psychology and social psychology.

The main topics addressed in Amos Arieli's research involve tactile and sensory interactions, motor control and adaptation, visual perception and processing mechanisms, mindfulness and compassion interventions, as well as anxiety, depression, psychometrics, and cognitive processes. Their work also extends to mental health research topics and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Amos Arieli has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • Studying the precuneus reveals structure-function-affect correlation in long-term meditators (2020, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience)
  • Inter-participant consistency of language-processing networks during abstract thoughts (2020, NeuroImage)
  • Idiosyncratic selection of active touch for shape perception (2022, Scientific Reports)
  • Active sensory substitution allows fast learning via effective motor-sensory strategies (2020, iScience)
  • Active palpation underlying shape perception is shaped by physiological thresholds and experience (2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Amos Arieli include Ehud Ahissar, Neomi Mizrachi, Guy Nelinger, Aviva Berkovich-Ohana, and Edna Furman-Haran.

Their publications are distributed across several venues reflecting diverse aspects of their scientific interests:

  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
  • NeuroImage
  • Scientific Reports
  • iScience
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses

    Amos Arieli;Alexander Sterkin;Amiram Grinvald;Ad Aertsen

  • Coupling Between Neuronal Firing, Field Potentials, and fMRI in Human Auditory Cortex

    Roy Mukamel;Hagar Gelbard;Amos Arieli;Uri Hasson

  • Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes

    Tal Kenet;Tal Kenet;Dmitri Bibitchkov;Misha Tsodyks;Amiram Grinvald

  • Linking Spontaneous Activity of Single Cortical Neurons and the Underlying Functional Architecture

    M. Tsodyks;T. Kenet;A. Grinvald;A. Arieli

  • Coupling between neuronal firing rate, gamma LFP, and BOLD fMRI is related to interneuronal correlations.

    Yuval Nir;Lior Fisch;Roy Mukamel;Hagar Gelbard-Sagiv

  • Interhemispheric correlations of slow spontaneous neuronal fluctuations revealed in human sensory cortex

    Yuval Nir;Roy Mukamel;Ilan Dinstein;Eran Privman

  • Dependence of Cortical Plasticity on Correlated Activity of Single Neurons and on Behavioral Context

    Ehud Ahissar;Eilon Vaadia;Merav Ahissar;Hagai Bergman

  • Coherent spatiotemporal patterns of ongoing activity revealed by real-time optical imaging coupled with single-unit recording in the cat visual cortex.

    A. Arieli;D. Shoham;R. Hildesheim;A. Grinvald

  • Imaging Cortical Dynamics at High Spatial and Temporal Resolution with Novel Blue Voltage-Sensitive Dyes

    Doron Shoham;Daniel E Glaser;Amos Arieli;Tal Kenet

  • Figuring Space by Time

    Ehud Ahissar;Amos Arieli

  • In-vivo Optical Imaging of Cortical Architecture and Dynamics

    A Grinvald;Shoham D, Shmuel, A;A Arieli;E Al

  • Long-Term Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging Reveals Cortical Dynamics in Behaving Monkeys

    Hamutal Slovin;Amos Arieli;Rina Hildesheim;Amiram Grinvald

  • Long-Term Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Reveal Mechanisms Underlying the Intrinsic Signal and Stability of Cortical Maps in V1 of Behaving Monkeys

    Eran Shtoyerman;Amos Arieli;Hamutal Slovin;Ivo Vanzetta

  • Imaging Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Surround Inhibition in the Barrels Somatosensory Cortex

    Dori Derdikman;Rina Hildesheim;Ehud Ahissar;Amos Arieli

  • Dural substitute for long-term imaging of cortical activity in behaving monkeys and its clinical implications.

    Amos Arieli;Amiram Grinvald;Hamutal Slovin

  • Dynamics of Depolarization and Hyperpolarization in the Frontal Cortex and Saccade Goal

    Eyal Seidemann;Amos Arieli;Amiram Grinvald;Hamutal Slovin

  • Tracking Decision Makers under Uncertainty

    Amos Arieli;Yaniv Ben-Ami;Ariel Rubinstein

  • Seeing via Miniature Eye Movements: A Dynamic Hypothesis for Vision.

    Ehud Ahissar;Amos Arieli

  • Never Resting Brain: Simultaneous Representation of Two Alpha Related Processes in Humans

    Eti Ben-Simon;Eti Ben-Simon;Ilana Podlipsky;Ilana Podlipsky;Amos Arieli;Andrey Zhdanov

  • Optical imaging of cortical activity: real-time imaging using extrinsic dye-signals and high resolution imaging based on slow intrinsic-signals.

    E E Lieke;R D Frostig;A Arieli;D Y Ts'o

Frequent Co-Authors

Amiram Grinvald
Amiram Grinvald Weizmann Institute of Science
Ehud Ahissar
Ehud Ahissar Weizmann Institute of Science
Rafael Malach
Rafael Malach Weizmann Institute of Science
Michal Harel
Michal Harel Weizmann Institute of Science
Misha Tsodyks
Misha Tsodyks Weizmann Institute of Science
Itzhak Fried
Itzhak Fried University of California, Los Angeles
Dov Sagi
Dov Sagi Weizmann Institute of Science
Yuval Nir
Yuval Nir Tel Aviv University
Ron D. Frostig
Ron D. Frostig University of California, Irvine
Ariel Rubinstein
Ariel Rubinstein Tel Aviv University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As neuroscience is a highly interdisciplinary field, students often explore related online degrees and career paths. A popular option is earning a psychology degree online, which covers foundational topics in behavior, cognition, and mental health. This can be a stepping stone for careers in research, counseling, or education.

For those interested in clinical practice or social services, a Master of Social Work is an attractive route. Many prospective students ask, how long does it take to get a msw online? MSW programs can typically be completed in two to three years, offering flexibility for working professionals.

Some students pursue advanced roles in therapy or psychology through doctoral study. There are a range of psy d programs designed for future clinical psychologists. These programs provide intensive training for licensure and direct patient care.

If you are leaning toward marriage and family therapy, you might investigate accredited lmft programs. These degrees open the door to licensure and specialized practice in counseling individuals, couples, and families.

Exploring these online degree options alongside neuroscience can broaden your expertise and expand your career opportunities in the behavioral, mental health, and clinical fields.

Best Scientists Citing Amos Arieli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles