World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
32181
World Ranking
18629
National Ranking
621

Albert A. Hagège publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert A. Hagège sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 242 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Albert A. Hagège D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert A. Hagège sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Albert A. Hagège is affiliated with the Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou in France and has a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine, with an emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their body of work spans 164 publications, with 107 specifically categorized under cardiology and cardiovascular studies.

Their research covers various subfields, including Epidemiology, Surgery, Molecular Biology, and Genetics. The main topics addressed in their work include cardiomyopathy and myosin studies, cardiovascular function and risk factors, cardiovascular effects of exercise, cardiac valve diseases and treatments, viral infections and immunology research, Trypanosoma species research and implications, and congenital heart disease studies.

Albert A. Hagège has published in several frequent venues, including:

  • Circulation
  • European Heart Journal
  • Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements
  • Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux - Pratique
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Among their recent papers are:

  • Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, 2020, The Lancet
  • Cardiac Involvement in Fabry Disease, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • An expert consensus document on the management of cardiovascular manifestations of Fabry disease, 2020, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • Aficamten for Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, 2024, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Comparison Between ESC and Duke Criteria for the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve Infective Endocarditis, 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging

Frequent collaborators in Albert A. Hagège's research include:

  • Iacopo Olivotto
  • Roberto Barriales-Villa
  • Ahmad Masri
  • Anjali Owens
  • Patricia Réant

Their work features a significant focus on clinical trials and expert consensus documents, particularly related to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Fabry disease, and prosthetic valve infective endocarditis. This reflects a combination of clinical and translational research aiming to improve cardiovascular disease diagnosis and treatment.

Best Publications

  • 2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

    Perry M Elliott;Aris Anastasakis

  • 2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    Perry M. Elliott;Aris Anastasakis;Michael A. Borger;Martin Borggrefe

  • Myoblast transplantation for heart failure.

    Philippe Menasché;Albert A Hagège;Marcio Scorsin;Bruno Pouzet

  • Autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation for severe postinfarction left ventricular dysfunction

    Philippe Menasché;Albert A Hagège;Jean-Thomas Vilquin;Michel Desnos

  • The Myoblast Autologous Grafting in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (MAGIC) Trial: First Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study of Myoblast Transplantation

    Philippe Menasché;Ottavio Alfieri;Stefan Janssens;William McKenna

  • Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

    Iacopo Olivotto;Artur Oreziak;Roberto Barriales-Villa;Theodore P. Abraham

  • Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition Compared With Enalapril on the Risk of Clinical Progression in Surviving Patients With Heart Failure

    Milton Packer;John J. V. McMurray;Akshay S. Desai;Jianjian Gong

  • Three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of the mitral valve, with implications for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse.

    R A Levine;M D Handschumacher;A J Sanfilippo;A A Hagege

  • Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiac progenitors for severe heart failure treatment: first clinical case report

    Philippe Menasché;Philippe Menasché;Valérie Vanneaux;Albert Hagège;Albert Hagège;Alain Bel

  • Transplantation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell–Derived Cardiovascular Progenitors for Severe Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction

    Philippe Menasché;Valérie Vanneaux;Albert Hagège;Alain Bel

  • Comparison of the effects of fetal cardiomyocyte and skeletal myoblast transplantation on postinfarction left ventricular function

    Marcio Scorsin;Albert Hagège;Jean-Thomas Vilquin;Marc Fiszman

  • Viability and differentiation of autologous skeletal myoblast grafts in ischaemic cardiomyopathy

    Albert A Hagège;Claire Carrion;Philippe Menasché;Jean-Thomas Vilquin

  • Organization and Sequence of Human Cardiac Myosin Binding Protein C Gene (MYBPC3) and Identification of Mutations Predicted to Produce Truncated Proteins in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

    G Bonne;E Bährend;B Yu

  • Long-Term Efficacy of Myoblast Transplantation on Regional Structure and Function After Myocardial Infarction

    Saïd Ghostine;Claire Carrion;Luiz César Guarita Souza;Pascal Richard

  • A purified population of multipotent cardiovascular progenitors derived from primate pluripotent stem cells engrafts in postmyocardial infarcted nonhuman primates

    Guillaume Blin;David Nury;Sonia Stefanovic;Tui Neri

  • Skeletal myoblast transplantation in ischemic heart failure: long-term follow-up of the first phase I cohort of patients.

    Albert A. Hagège;Jean-Pierre Marolleau;Jean-Thomas Vilquin;Armelle Alhéritière

  • Transplantation of cardiac-committed mouse embryonic stem cells to infarcted sheep myocardium: a preclinical study

    Claudine Ménard;Albert A Hagège;Albert A Hagège;Onnik Agbulut;Onnik Agbulut;Marietta Barro

  • Mitral valve disease—morphology and mechanisms

    Robert A. Levine;Albert A. Hagége;Daniel P. Judge;Muralidhar Padala

  • Clinical Features and Prognostic Implications of Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Related to the Cardiac Myosin-Binding Protein C Gene

    P Charron;O Dubourg;M Desnos;M Bennaceur

  • Serial left ventricular adaptations in world-class professional cyclists: Implications for disease screening and follow-up☆

    Eric Abergel;Gilles Chatellier;Albert A Hagege;Agnes Oblak

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippe Menasché
Philippe Menasché Université Paris Cité
Michel Pucéat
Michel Pucéat Aix-Marseille University
Xavier Jeunemaitre
Xavier Jeunemaitre Université Paris Cité
Mickael Tanter
Mickael Tanter ESPCI Paris
Mathieu Pernot
Mathieu Pernot Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Ketty Schwartz
Ketty Schwartz Grenoble Alpes University
Patrick Bruneval
Patrick Bruneval Grenoble Alpes University
lionel van maldergem
lionel van maldergem Aix-Marseille University
Mathias Fink
Mathias Fink ESPCI Paris
Philippe Amouyel
Philippe Amouyel University of Lille

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare career pathways can open diverse opportunities beyond traditional medicine programs in the USA. One popular choice for those interested in advanced nursing roles—even without a prior nursing degree—is enrolling in direct entry online MSN programs. These programs provide a streamlined route to a master's degree in nursing for career changers.

For those just starting out, there are easy nursing schools to get into, which provide more accessible entry points without sacrificing the quality of education. Some programs also simplify the admissions process by offering an lpn program without teas test, making nursing education even more approachable.

If you’re interested in the administrative side of healthcare, consider medical billing and coding. Many reputable schools offer flexible, fully online programs, and you may be eligible for financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes, further reducing barriers to entry in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Albert A. Hagège

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles