World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 70 2227 2115 1002 940 145 48445

Adam Siepel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Adam Siepel between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Adam Siepel published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2011. 22 of the 182 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2011. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 12 publications
1995 2025

182 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Adam Siepel: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 4
2002 4
2003 3
2004 8
2005 8
2006 4
2007 8
2008 4
2009 6
2010 6
2011 16
2012 4
2013 10
2014 10
2015 6
2016 2
2017 4
2018 4
2019 8
2020 9
2021 12
2022 8
2023 8
2024 10
2025 12
Total 182
Download as CSV

Adam Siepel publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Siepel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 145–154 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 145 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193 145
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Adam Siepel D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Siepel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158 70
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 2009 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Adam Siepel is affiliated with Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in the United States and has a research focus within the broad field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work spans multiple subfields including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Plant Science, Cancer Research, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The primary topics of Adam Siepel's research include:

  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Adam Siepel include:

  • "A community-maintained standard library of population genetic models," 2020, eLife
  • "Mapping gene flow between ancient hominins through demography-aware inference of the ancestral recombination graph," 2020, PLoS Genetics
  • "Identification of constrained sequence elements across 239 primate genomes," 2023, Nature
  • "Genomic islands of differentiation in a rapid avian radiation have been driven by recent selective sweeps," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "A Deep-Learning Approach for Inference of Selective Sweeps from the Ancestral Recombination Graph," 2021, Molecular Biology and Evolution

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Yixin Zhao (13 publications)
  • Armin Scheben (12 publications)
  • Noah Dukler (8 publications)
  • Ziyi Mo (7 publications)
  • Ryan N. Gutenkunst (5 publications)

Adam Siepel's research has been published in several prominent venues, among which the most frequent are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 20 publications
  • PLoS Genetics, 3 publications
  • Nature, 3 publications
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution, 3 publications
  • Nature Communications, 3 publications

Their work in genetics and molecular biology has earned formal recognition with awards including:

  • Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, 2012
  • Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, 2009

Best Publications

  • Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project

    Ewan Birney;John A. Stamatoyannopoulos;Anindya Dutta;Roderic Guigó

  • Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes

    Adam Siepel;Gill Bejerano;Jakob Skou Pedersen;Angie S Hinrichs

  • The ENCODE (ENCyclopedia of DNA elements) Project

    E. A. Feingold;P. J. Good;M. S. Guyer;S. Kamholz

  • Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies

    Katherine S. Pollard;Melissa J. Hubisz;Kate R. Rosenbloom;Adam Siepel

  • Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution

    Ladeana W. Hillier;Webb Miller;Ewan Birney;Wesley Warren

  • The UCSC Genome Browser Database: update 2006

    A. S. Hinrichs;D. Karolchik;R. Baertsch;G. P. Barber

  • Phylogenetic Hidden Markov Models

    Adam Siepel;David Haussler

  • Combining phylogenetic and hidden Markov models in biosequence analysis.

    Adam C. Siepel;David Haussler

  • Evolutionary and biomedical insights from the rhesus macaque genome

    Richard A. Gibbs;Jeffrey Rogers

  • A high-resolution map of human evolutionary constraint using 29 mammals.

    Kerstin Lindblad-Toh;Manuel Garber;Or Zuk;Michael F. Lin;Michael F. Lin

  • An RNA gene expressed during cortical development evolved rapidly in humans

    Katherine S Pollard;Sofie R Salama;Nelle Lambert;Marie-Alexandra Lambot

  • Comparative analyses of multi-species sequences from targeted genomic regions

    J. W. Thomas;J. W. Thomas;J. W. Touchman;R. W. Blakesley;G. G. Bouffard

  • Comparative and demographic analysis of orang-utan genomes.

    Devin P. Locke;LaDeana W. Hillier;Wesley C. Warren;Kim C. Worley

  • Genome Sequencing Highlights the Dynamic Early History of Dogs

    Adam H. Freedman;Ilan Gronau;Rena Schweizer;Diego Ortega-Del Vecchyo

  • Analysis of nascent RNA identifies a unified architecture of initiation regions at mammalian promoters and enhancers

    Leighton J Core;André L Martins;Charles G Danko;Colin T Waters

  • Bayesian inference of ancient human demography from individual genome sequences

    Ilan Gronau;Melissa J Hubisz;Brad Gulko;Charles G Danko

  • Identification and classification of conserved RNA secondary structures in the human genome

    Jakob Skou Pedersen;Gill Bejerano;Adam C. Siepel;Kate R. Rosenbloom

  • Patterns of positive selection in six Mammalian genomes

    Carolin Kosiol;Tomáš Vinař;Rute R. da Fonseca;Melissa J. Hubisz

  • Forces Shaping the Fastest Evolving Regions in the Human Genome

    Katherine S Pollard;Sofie R Salama;Bryan King;Andrew D Kern

  • A distal enhancer and an ultraconserved exon are derived from a novel retroposon

    Gill Bejerano;Craig B. Lowe;Nadav Ahituv;Nadav Ahituv;Bryan King

Frequent Co-Authors

David Haussler
David Haussler University of California, Santa Cruz
Melissa J. Hubisz
Melissa J. Hubisz Cornell University
John T. Lis
John T. Lis Cornell University
Kerstin Lindblad-Toh
Kerstin Lindblad-Toh Uppsala University
Carlos Bustamante
Carlos Bustamante Stanford University
Webb Miller
Webb Miller Pennsylvania State University
Gill Bejerano
Gill Bejerano Stanford University
Kate R. Rosenbloom
Kate R. Rosenbloom University of California, Santa Cruz
Jakob Skou Pedersen
Jakob Skou Pedersen Aarhus University
Katherine S. Pollard
Katherine S. Pollard University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics opens doors to diverse career paths in healthcare, research, and diagnostics. Many students begin their journey in allied health fields, which share critical foundational skills with genetics. For example, registered nurses looking to advance their credentials can consider the best online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements. These programs are flexible and ideal for those balancing work and study.

Healthcare professionals aiming for leadership roles might be interested in 12-month online dnp programs. Such accelerated options allow for advanced degrees without long commitments. If you’re seeking a quick path into the medical field, medical assistant programs can be completed in as little as six weeks and provide a stepping stone toward further study in genetics or related areas.

For those focused on the highest levels of clinical expertise, selecting the right dnp school can shape advanced career opportunities. No matter where you start, online degrees and accelerated pathways make it easier than ever to transition into genetics-related professions and to keep pace with the industry’s rapid growth.

Best Scientists Citing Adam Siepel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles