Data Sources for the Research.com Best Medicine Scientists in Indonesia Ranking (4th Edition)
The 4th edition of the Research.com Best Medicine Scientists in Indonesia Ranking is established using data aggregated from leading bibliometric databases, chiefly OpenAlex and CrossRef, supplemented by several additional authoritative sources. These platforms provide comprehensive records of scholarly publications and citation metrics, ensuring the reliability and completeness of the dataset used to assess scientific excellence. For this edition, the bibliometric data underlying the citation-based metrics were meticulously collected as of 2024-11-27.
A scientist’s placement in the ranking is determined primarily by their D-index (Discipline H-index), which quantifies only those publications and corresponding citations relevant to the specific discipline under consideration—in this case, Medicine. The D-index thus provides a focused and precise measure of a researcher’s impact within their field.
Scope and Research Criteria
The current edition of the ranking comprehensively examined 279,971 scientist profiles from a broad spectrum of bibliometric sources, spanning all academic disciplines. Within the domain of Medicine specifically, only 1 scientist met the qualifying criteria for inclusion.
Eligibility for the Medicine ranking was predicated on the following requirements:
- A minimum D-index threshold of 70.
- The majority of indexed publications must be in the area of Medicine.
- Consideration of scientists’ awards and achievements specific to the Medicine field.
- The D-index threshold is calibrated (in increments of 10) according to the number of scholars within each discipline, ensuring that the top 1% of leading scholars are incorporated into the list.
- A maximum proximity of 30% or less between a scholar’s general H-index and their D-index to guarantee discipline relevance and accuracy.
Verification and Quality Assurance Practices
The team curating the Research.com rankings recognizes that bibliometric data, while invaluable, is inherently imperfect and should not be used as the sole instrument for evaluating scientific performance. To address this, all scientist profiles were subject to rigorous manual verification. Information was cross-referenced across an extensive range of reputable scholarly publication sources to ensure correctness and completeness.
Although the number of publications in top-tier journals and conference proceedings does not factor directly into ranking positions, this metric offers a valuable secondary indicator of a scientist’s influence and contributions within their research domain. The ranking positions are ultimately determined by the D-index, using validated bibliometric information from OpenAlex and CrossRef—the two preeminent data repositories of their kind.
For a detailed overview of the methodology and verification procedures, we encourage interested parties to consult our methodology page.
The Research.com Mission
The central mission behind the creation of the Research.com rankings is to foster transparency and inspiration within the global research community. We aim to motivate researchers, as well as stakeholders in industry and policy, to closely examine the trajectories of leading scientific experts. More importantly, our rankings serve as a resource for the wider scientific community—enabling scholars, academic institutions, and the public to discover and connect with the foremost experts in specific fields and across different regions and institutions.
By emphasizing careful, data-driven selection complemented by manual validation, Research.com strives to contribute to the recognition of excellence in science—encouraging ongoing scholarly achievement and fostering global collaboration.