The 25th International Symposium on Research in Attacks, Intrusions and Defenses (RAID)

The ranking presented on this page offers a comprehensive assessment of scientific conferences within the field of Computer Science. Developed by Research.com, a leading authority in tracking scientific research and contributions across all major disciplines since 2014, this ranking provides a reliable benchmark for evaluating the academic impact and prominence of Computer Science conferences worldwide.

This ranking is based on a proprietary bibliometric score meticulously devised by Research.com, integrating both the estimated h-index and the count of leading scientists who have contributed to each conference over the past three years. The Impact Score values published here were collected on 2024-11-27, ensuring that the data reflects the most recent and relevant scientific activity within the discipline.

The methodology underlying the ranking is both rigorous and comprehensive. Experts at Research.com conducted an in-depth survey of more than 2,742 conferences in Computer Science, carefully selected through a detailed inspection process. This evaluation involved the analysis of over 148,739 scientific documents produced in the last three years by 13,184 distinguished scientists known for their substantial contributions to the field.

For those interested in understanding the analytical framework and computations used to derive these rankings, further details are available on our Methodology Page. This resource provides an in-depth explanation of our criteria and scoring system, reflecting the depth of research and expertise infused into every aspect of this ranking.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection (based on the number of publications) are:

• Salvatore J. Stolfo (6 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Angelos Stavrou (4 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Syed Ali Khayam (4 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Christopher Kruegel (4 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Giovanni Vigna (3 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection (based on the number of publications) are:

• Columbia University (8 papers) absent at the last edition,
• University of California, Santa Barbara (5 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Chinese Academy of Sciences (5 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition,
• Georgia Institute of Technology (5 papers) absent at the last edition,
• George Mason University (5 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2017 edition, 4.76% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 30.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 15.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 30.00% of all publications and 25.00% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.