The 17th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference and Exhibition on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Asia (SIGGRAPH Asia)

The ranking presented on this page highlights the most distinguished scientific conferences in the field of Computer Science. Developed by Research.com, one of the leading websites dedicated to providing trusted data on scientific research and contributions across all major scientific fields since 2014, this ranking serves as a reliable resource for researchers, academics, and professionals seeking insight into the most influential conferences within the domain.

Each conference’s position in the ranking is determined by a unique bibliometric score, meticulously crafted by Research.com. This score is calculated using a combination of the estimated h-index and the number of leading scientists who have participated in the respective conference during the previous three years, providing a nuanced measure of both scholarly impact and thought leadership within the community.

The Impact Score values contained in this ranking were gathered as of November 27, 2024. To ensure accurate and meaningful results, the evaluation process involved the thorough examination of more than 2,742 conferences. These conferences were carefully selected through rigorous inspection and analysis of over 148,739 scientific documents published during the past three years by 13,184 prominent and widely recognized scientists specializing in Computer Science.

For those seeking a deeper understanding of the methodology and analytical procedures behind the computation of these ranking scores, more comprehensive details are available on our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at SIGGRAPH Conference and Exhibition on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Asia (based on the number of publications) are:

• Mark Pauly (3 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Andrea Tagliasacchi (2 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Peng Song (2 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Ziqi Wang (2 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Andrew Fitzgibbon (1 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at SIGGRAPH Conference and Exhibition on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Asia (based on the number of publications) are:

• École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (3 papers) absent at the last edition,
• University of Victoria (2 papers) absent at the last edition,
• University of Edinburgh (1 papers) absent at the last edition,
• University of Bath (1 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition,
• National University of Singapore (1 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2020 edition, 0.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 100.00% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 0.00% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 0.00% of all publications and 0.00% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.