80th Device Research Conference (DRC)

This scientific conference ranking provides an authoritative listing of the most prominent conferences in the field of Engineering and Technology. Compiled by Research.com—one of the leading platforms for scientific research data across all major fields and a trusted resource for scholarly contributions since 2014—this ranking offers researchers a reliable reference point grounded in robust academic analysis.

The ranking is based on a distinctive bibliometric score developed by Research.com. This score is calculated using a combination of the estimated h-index and the number of leading scientists who have participated in the conference over the past three years. Such a methodology ensures that both the academic impact and the quality of each conference's contributors are comprehensively taken into account.

The Impact Score values featured in this ranking were collected as of 2024-11-27. The rigorous ranking process began with the examination of more than 2,262 conferences, carefully selected following a detailed inspection and thorough assessment of over 26,934 scientific documents published in the last three years. This evaluation involved contributions from 9,385 renowned and respected scientists within the Engineering and Technology domain, ensuring that the analysis reflects the highest standards of academic excellence.

For those seeking a deeper understanding of the score computation and selection procedures, further information on the methodological framework is available on our Methodology Page.

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each conference is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing at Device Research Conference (based on the number of publications) are:

• Umesh K. Mishra (53 papers) published 3 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Debdeep Jena (46 papers) published 7 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Suman Datta (37 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Mark J. W. Rodwell (37 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Thomas N. Jackson (31 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing at Device Research Conference (based on the number of publications) are:

• Purdue University (132 papers) published 13 papers at the last edition, 4 more than at the previous edition,
• IBM (117 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• University of California, Santa Barbara (115 papers) published 6 papers at the last edition, 1 less than at the previous edition,
• University of Notre Dame (94 papers) published 8 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• University of Texas at Austin (91 papers) published 5 papers at the last edition, 2 less than at the previous edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing at this conference is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the conference for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions at the conference edition to all articles published within that conference. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the conference.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2017 edition, 1.80% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 44.95% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing at the conference. Another 15.60% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 10.09% of all publications and 29.36% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of conferences they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same conference from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the conference in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing at a conference. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a conference, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.