World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
10100
World Ranking
5196
National Ranking
92

Zahra Kalantari publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zahra Kalantari sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 258 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Zahra Kalantari D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zahra Kalantari sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services.

    Saskia Keesstra;Saskia Keesstra;Joao P. Nunes;Joao P. Nunes;Agata Novara;David Finger

  • Twenty-three unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH)–a community perspective

    Günter Blöschl;Marc F.P. Bierkens;Antonio Chambel;Christophe Cudennec

  • Soil degradation in the European Mediterranean region: Processes, status and consequences.

    Carla S.S. Ferreira;Samaneh Seifollahi-Aghmiuni;Georgia Destouni;Navid Ghajarnia

  • Wetlands as large-scale nature-based solutions : Status and challenges for research, engineering and management

    Josefin Thorslund;Jerker Jarsjo;Fernando Jaramillo;James W. Jawitz

  • Urban Areas

    Unknown

  • A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran

    Alireza Arabameri;Khalil Rezaei;Artemi Cerdà;Christian Conoscenti

  • Urbanisation-driven land degradation and socioeconomic challenges in peri-urban areas: Insights from Southern Europe

    Unknown

  • Climatic or regionally induced by humans? Tracing hydro-climatic and land-use changes to better understand the Lake Urmia tragedy

    Bahram Khazaei;Sina Khatami;Seyed Hamed Alemohammad;Lida Rashidi

  • Drought and flood in the Anthropocene: feedback mechanisms in reservoir operation

    Giuliano Di Baldassarre;Fabian Martinez;Zahra Kalantari;Alberto Viglione

  • Urban flood modeling using deep-learning approaches in Seoul, South Korea

    Xinxiang Lei;Wei Chen;Wei Chen;Mahdi Panahi;Fatemeh Falah

  • Current Wildland Fire Patterns and Challenges in Europe: A Synthesis of National Perspectives

    Nieves Fernandez-Anez;Andrey Krasovskiy;Mortimer Müller;Harald Vacik

  • Nature-based solutions for flood-drought risk mitigation in vulnerable urbanizing parts of East-Africa

    Zahra Kalantari;Carla Sofia Santos Ferreira;Saskia Keesstra;Georgia Destouni

  • Distinction, quantification and mapping of potential and realized supply-demand of flow-dependent ecosystem services

    Romain Goldenberg;Zahra Kalantari;Vladimir Cvetkovic;Ulla Mörtberg

  • Identifying barriers for nature-based solutions in flood risk management: An interdisciplinary overview using expert community approach.

    Unknown

  • GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using numerical risk factor bivariate model and its ensemble with linear multivariate regression and boosted regression tree algorithms

    Alireza Arabameri;Biswajeet Pradhan;Biswajeet Pradhan;Khalil Rezaei;Masoud Sohrabi

  • Wetlands as nature-based solutions for water management in different environments

    Unknown

  • Contribution of prioritized urban nature-based solutions allocation to carbon neutrality

    Unknown

  • Soil water erosion susceptibility assessment using deep learning algorithms

    Unknown

  • Development of novel hybridized models for urban flood susceptibility mapping.

    Omid Rahmati;Hamid Darabi;Mahdi Panahi;Zahra Kalantari

  • Priorities and Interactions of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with Focus on Wetlands

    Fernando Jaramillo;Amanda Desormeaux;Johanna Hedlund;James W. Jawitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Georgia Destouni
Georgia Destouni Stockholm University
Omid Rahmati
Omid Rahmati Agricultural Research Education And Extention Organization
Steve W. Lyon
Steve W. Lyon The Ohio State University
Saskia Keesstra
Saskia Keesstra Wageningen University & Research
Dieu Tien Bui
Dieu Tien Bui University of South-Eastern Norway
António Ferreira
António Ferreira Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra
Jerker Jarsjö
Jerker Jarsjö Stockholm University
Giuliano Di Baldassarre
Giuliano Di Baldassarre Uppsala University
Per-Erik Jansson
Per-Erik Jansson Royal Institute of Technology
Artemi Cerdà
Artemi Cerdà University of Valencia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to several related online degrees that enhance career prospects. Many students seek flexible options, making the easiest bachelor degree to get a practical choice for those balancing commitments while pursuing education in environmental fields.

For those interested in earth processes and natural resources, pursuing a geologist degree online can be an effective way to enter industries focusing on sustainability, mining, or environmental protection.

Skills in spatial analysis and data interpretation are increasingly valuable. Earning a master’s degree through top GIS masters programs prepares students for careers leveraging Geographic Information Systems in environmental management, urban planning, and disaster response.

Additionally, leadership roles in environmental policy and administration may benefit from streamlined educational routes such as the easiest online MPA programs, which develop skills in public affairs and governance to support sustainable decision-making.

Best Scientists Citing Zahra Kalantari

Recently Published Articles