World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 40 5396 5006 217 204 96 6214

Wouter van den Bos publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wouter van den Bos between 1957 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wouter van den Bos published across 69 years, from 1957 to 2025, averaging 2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2025. 26 of the 140 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1957 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2025. 1957: 1 publication 1958: 1 publication 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 2 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 16 publications
1957 2025

140 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wouter van den Bos: publications per year, 1957 to 2025
Year Publications
1957 1
1958 1
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 2
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 2
2008 1
2009 5
2010 2
2011 3
2012 6
2013 5
2014 6
2015 2
2016 4
2017 13
2018 4
2019 6
2020 12
2021 14
2022 12
2023 13
2024 10
2025 16
Total 140
Download as CSV

Wouter van den Bos publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wouter van den Bos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 94–103 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 96 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390 96
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Wouter van den Bos D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wouter van den Bos sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297 40
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Wouter van den Bos is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple areas within psychology and social sciences, with a focus on developmental and cognitive processes.

The primary fields of study for van den Bos include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Key subfields of study are:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Van den Bos has contributed to several notable publications. Recent papers encompass:

  • "The relationship between pubertal hormones and brain plasticity: Implications for cognitive training in adolescence" (2020), published in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • "Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences" (2021), published in npj Science of Learning
  • "Close proximity risk assessment for SARS-CoV-2 infection" (2021), published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Opportunities for increased reproducibility and replicability of developmental neuroimaging" (2020), published in Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • "Adolescent risk-taking in the context of exploration and social influence" (2021), published in Developmental Review

Frequent co-authors collaborating with van den Bos include:

  • Simon Ciranka
  • Lucas Molleman
  • Anna C. K. van Duijvenvoorde
  • Damien S. Fleur
  • Bert Bredeweg

Their work is commonly published in venues such as:

  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Adolescence
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Developmental Review

Best Publications

  • Striatum–Medial Prefrontal Cortex Connectivity Predicts Developmental Changes in Reinforcement Learning

    Wouter van den Bos;Wouter van den Bos;Michael X. Cohen;Thorsten Kahnt;Eveline A. Crone

  • Changing Brains, Changing Perspectives The Neurocognitive Development of Reciprocity

    Wouter van den Bos;Eric van Dijk;Michiel Westenberg;Serge A.R.B. Rombouts;Serge A.R.B. Rombouts

  • Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity

    Wouter van den Bos;Christian A. Rodriguez;Julie B. Schweitzer;Samuel M. McClure

  • What motivates repayment? Neural correlates of reciprocity in the Trust Game

    Wouter van den Bos;Eric van Dijk;Michiel Westenberg;Serge A.R.B. Rombouts

  • Fairness considerations: Increasing understanding of intentionality during adolescence

    Berna Güroğlu;Wouter van den Bos;Eveline A. Crone

  • Connectivity Strength of Dissociable Striatal Tracts Predict Individual Differences in Temporal Discounting

    Wouter van den Bos;Christian A. Rodriguez;Julie B. Schweitzer;Samuel M. McClure

  • Unfair? It depends: Neural correlates of fairness in social context

    Berna Güroğlu;Wouter van den Bos;Serge A.R.B. Rombouts;Eveline A. Crone

  • Sharing and giving across adolescence: an experimental study examining the development of prosocial behavior

    Berna Güroğlu;Wouter van den Bos;Eveline A. Crone

  • Dissociable brain networks involved in development of fairness considerations: understanding intentionality behind unfairness.

    Berna Güroğlu;Wouter van den Bos;Eric van Dijk;Serge A.R.B. Rombouts

  • Adolescents display distinctive tolerance to ambiguity and to uncertainty during risky decision making.

    Wouter van den Bos;Ralph Hertwig

  • Development of Trust and Reciprocity in Adolescence.

    Wouter van den Bos;Michiel Westenberg;Eric van Dijk;Eveline A. Crone

  • Towards a general model of temporal discounting.

    Wouter van den Bos;Samuel M. McClure

  • Social Influence in Adolescent Decision-Making: A Formal Framework.

    Simon Kai Ciranka;Wouter van den Bos

  • The relationship between pubertal hormones and brain plasticity: Implications for cognitive training in adolescence.

    Corinna Laube;Wouter van den Bos;Yana Fandakova

  • Regions of the MPFC differentially tuned to social and nonsocial affective evaluation.

    Lasana T. Harris;Lasana T. Harris;Samuel M. McClure;Samuel M. McClure;Wouter Van Den Bos;Wouter Van Den Bos;Jonathan D. Cohen;Jonathan D. Cohen

  • Metacognition: ideas and insights from neuro- and educational sciences

    Damien S. Fleur;Bert Bredeweg;Bert Bredeweg;Wouter van den Bos;Wouter van den Bos

  • Early adversity and learning: implications for typical and atypical behavioral development

    Jamie L. Hanson;Wouter van den Bos;Barbara J. Roeber;Karen D. Rudolph

  • Better than expected or as bad as you thought? The neurocognitive development of probabilistic feedback processing

    Wouter van den Bos;Berna Güroğlu;Bianca G van den Bulk;Serge A R B Rombouts;Serge A R B Rombouts

  • Dealing with uncertainty: testing risk- and ambiguity-attitude across adolescence

    Neeltje E. Blankenstein;Eveline A. Crone;Wouter van den Bos;Anna C. K. van Duijvenvoorde

  • Toward an integrative account of social cognition: marrying theory of mind and interactionism to study the interplay of Type 1 and Type 2 processes

    Vivian Bohl;Vivian Bohl;Wouter van den Bos

  • Training cognition in ADHD: current findings, borrowed concepts, and future directions.

    Kyle J. Rutledge;Wouter van den Bos;Samuel M. McClure;Julie B. Schweitzer

Frequent Co-Authors

Eveline A. Crone
Eveline A. Crone Erasmus University Rotterdam
Samuel M. McClure
Samuel M. McClure Arizona State University
Serge A.R.B. Rombouts
Serge A.R.B. Rombouts Leiden University
Jonathan D. Cohen
Jonathan D. Cohen Princeton University
Eric van Dijk
Eric van Dijk Leiden University
Eric Maskin
Eric Maskin Harvard University
Stephen P. Hinshaw
Stephen P. Hinshaw University of California, Berkeley
Ronald E. Dahl
Ronald E. Dahl University of California, Berkeley
Susan T. Fiske
Susan T. Fiske Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering advancing your education in Social Sciences and Humanities, exploring online degree options can open flexible and affordable pathways. Many universities in the USA now offer accredited online programs tailored to future counselors, therapists, psychologists, and social workers.

For students interested in mental health counseling, cacrep-accredited programs ensure the highest standards and better career prospects. If family dynamics or relationship therapy interests you, check out online mft programs accredited for specialized training in marriage and family therapy.

Pursuing affordable online psychology degrees can prepare you for various roles in research, counseling, or organizational settings. Those aiming to work in community support or clinical environments might consider masters in social work online programs for direct-entry options into the social work profession.

Online degrees not only provide flexibility but also make it easier for students to balance studies with work or family commitments—while opening up diverse career pathways in the social sciences and humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Wouter van den Bos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles