World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Veeriah Jegatheesan

Veeriah Jegatheesan

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
31
Citations
3146
World Ranking
9728
National Ranking
465

Veeriah Jegatheesan publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Veeriah Jegatheesan sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 104 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Veeriah Jegatheesan D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Veeriah Jegatheesan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Veeriah Jegatheesan is affiliated with RMIT University in Australia and works primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Engineering. Their research focuses largely on water science and technology, biomedical engineering, environmental engineering, mechanical engineering, and the study of surfaces, coatings, and films.

Their work covers several main research topics including membrane separation technologies, extraction and separation processes, membrane-based ion separation techniques, surface modification and superhydrophobicity, odor and emission control technologies, water treatment and disinfection, and environmental remediation with nanomaterials.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Lithium recovery from salt-lake brine: Impact of competing cations, pretreatment and preconcentration (2020) published in Chemosphere
  • Natural organic matter removal and fouling resistance properties of a boron nitride nanosheet-functionalized thin film nanocomposite membrane and its impact on permeate chlorine demand (2020) published in Journal of Water Process Engineering
  • Tackling fat, oil, and grease (FOG) build-up in sewers: Insights into deposit formation and sustainable in-sewer management techniques (2023) published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Influence of improper disposal on FOG deposition: Rheological behaviour and pumping power requirements in sewer systems (2025) published in Water Research
  • Challenges in environmental science and engineering (2022) published in Process Safety and Environmental Protection

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Veeriah Jegatheesan include:

  • Biplob Kumar Pramanik
  • Hamza Hassan Yusuf
  • Felicity Roddick
  • Muhammad Bilal Asif
  • Rajeev Roychand

The most common venues for their publications are:

  • Chemosphere
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Journal of Water Process Engineering
  • Water Research
  • Process Safety and Environmental Protection

Best Publications

  • An economic evaluation of phosphorus recovery as struvite from digester supernatant

    L. Shu;P. Schneider;V. Jegatheesan;J. Johnson

  • Treatment of textile wastewater with membrane bioreactor: A critical review

    Veeriah Jegatheesan;Biplob Kumar Pramanik;Jingyu Chen;Dimuth Navaratna

  • A Review on the Mechanism, Impacts and Control Methods of Membrane Fouling in MBR System.

    Xianjun Du;Yaoke Shi;Veeriah Jegatheesan;Izaz Ul Haq

  • A review of the management and treatment of brine solutions

    Biplob Kumar Pramanik;Li Shu;Veeriah Jegatheesan

  • Performance of suspended and attached growth MBR systems in treating high strength synthetic wastewater

    S. Jamal Khan;Shazia Ilyas;Sadaf Javid;C. Visvanathan

  • Deep Bed Filtration: Mathematical Models and Observations

    V. Jegatheesan;S. Vigneswaran

  • Metal recovery from reverse osmosis concentrate

    T. Jeppesen;L. Shu;G. Keir;V. Jegatheesan

  • Evaluation of single and two stage anaerobic digestion of landfill leachate: Effect of pH and initial organic loading rate on volatile fatty acid (VFA) and biogas production

    Sameena Begum;Sameena Begum;Gangagni Rao Anupoju;S. Sridhar;Suresh K. Bhargava

  • Landfill leachate treatment using thermophilic membrane bioreactor

    C. Visvanathan;M.K. Choudhary;M.T. Montalbo;V. Jegatheesan

  • Fouling in reverse osmosis (RO) membrane in water recovery from secondary effluent: a review

    Santosh Raj Pandey;Veeriah Jegatheesan;Kanagaratnam Baskaran;Li Shu

  • Mitigation strategies of hydrogen sulphide emission in sewer networks – A review

    Kyoohong Park;Hongsik Lee;Shaun Phelan;Susanthi Liyanaarachchi

  • The need for global coordination in sustainable development

    V. Jegatheesan;J.L. Liow;L. Shu;S.H. Kim

  • Fate of road-dust associated microplastics and per- and polyfluorinated substances in stormwater

    Biplob Kumar Pramanik;Rajeev Roychand;Sirajum Monira;Muhammed Bhuiyan

  • Reuse of car wash wastewater by chemical coagulation and membrane bioreactor treatment processes

    Ida Alicia Rodriguez Boluarte;Michael Andersen;Biplob Kumar Pramanik;Chia-Yuan Chang

  • A review of resource recovery from seawater desalination brine

    Xin Zhang;Wenyan Zhao;Yang Zhang;Veeriah Jegatheesan

  • Nanofiltration for the possible reuse of water and recovery of sodium chloride salt from textile effluent

    L. Shu;T.D. Waite;P.J. Bliss;A. Fane

  • Dissolved Oxygen Control in Activated Sludge Process Using a Neural Network-Based Adaptive PID Algorithm

    Xianjun Du;Junlu Wang;Veeriah Jegatheesan;Guohua Shi

  • Optimisation of electro-Fenton denitrification of a model wastewater using a response surface methodology.

    Jurate Virkutyte;Ekaterina Rokhina;Veeriah Jegatheesan

  • Evaluation of chlorine decay kinetics expressions for drinking water distribution systems modelling

    G. J. Kastl;I. H. Fisher;V. Jegatheesan

  • Problems in seawater industrial desalination processes and potential sustainable solutions: a review

    Unknown

  • Effect of powdered activated carbon (PAC) and cationic polymer on biofouling mitigation in hybrid MBRs.

    S. Jamal Khan;C. Visvanathan;V. Jegatheesan

  • Electro-Fenton, hydrogenotrophic and Fe2+ ions mediated TOC and nitrate removal from aquaculture system: different experimental strategies.

    Jurate Virkutyte;Jurate Virkutyte;Veeriah Jegatheesan

  • Lithium recovery from salt-lake brine: Impact of competing cations, pretreatment and preconcentration.

    Biplob Kumar Pramanik;Muhammad Bilal Asif;Muhammad Bilal Asif;Rajeev Roychand;Li Shu

  • Suitability of Chlorine Bulk Decay Models for Planning and Management of Water Distribution Systems

    Ian Fisher;George Kastl;Arumugam Sathasivan;Veeriah Jegatheesan

  • Graphene Oxide (GO)-Blended Polysulfone (PSf) Ultrafiltration Membranes for Lead Ion Rejection

    Harish Ravishankar;Jens Christy;Veeriah Jegatheesan

  • Effects of nano cerium (IV) oxide and zinc oxide particles on biogas production

    Duc Nguyen;C. Visvanathan;P. Jacob;V. Jegatheesan

  • Pretreatment of seawater for biodegradable organic content removal using membrane bioreactor

    Chettiyappan Visvanathan;Natapol Boonthanon;Arumugam Sathasivan;Veeriah Jegatheesan

  • A review of computational fluid dynamics applications in pressure-driven membrane filtration

    Greg Keir;Greg Keir;Veeriah Jegatheesan

  • Removal of Pb (II) ions using polymer based graphene oxide magnetic nano-sorbent

    Harish Ravishankar;Harish Ravishankar;Jinfeng Wang;Li Shu;Veeriah Jegatheesan

  • Performance of ceramic ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membranes in treating car wash wastewater for reuse

    Shamima Moazzem;Jamie Wills;Linhua Fan;Felicity Roddick

Frequent Co-Authors

Chettiyappan Visvanathan
Chettiyappan Visvanathan Asian Institute of Technology
Saravanamuthu Vigneswaran
Saravanamuthu Vigneswaran University of Technology Sydney
Ho Kyong Shon
Ho Kyong Shon University of Technology Sydney
Eldon R. Rene
Eldon R. Rene IHE Delft Institute for Water Education
Huu Hao Ngo
Huu Hao Ngo University of Technology Sydney
Long D. Nghiem
Long D. Nghiem University of Technology Sydney
Suresh K. Bhargava
Suresh K. Bhargava RMIT University
Biplob Kumar Pramanik
Biplob Kumar Pramanik RMIT University
Faisal I. Hai
Faisal I. Hai University of Wollongong
Baoyu Gao
Baoyu Gao Shandong University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to diverse career options in rapidly-evolving industries. Many students look to supplement their technical skills with specialized business knowledge to increase their opportunities.

For aspiring tech entrepreneurs, pursuing the best online mba in entrepreneurship offers insights into management, innovation, and business growth. These programs help bridge the gap between technology and business strategy, preparing graduates for leadership roles in startups and established companies alike.

Flexibility is crucial for working professionals, and finding an mba online no gmat can save time and streamline the admissions process. This is particularly appealing to those seeking rapid career advancement without the added burden of standardized tests.

Engineers interested in overseeing complex projects may consider the cheapest online masters in project management. These degrees equip graduates with essential skills for managing teams, resources, and budgets within tech-driven environments.

Additionally, the technical expertise acquired in engineering can be valuable in the property market. Exploring real estate degree programs online can open alternative career pathways, from construction management to real estate development.

Best Scientists Citing Veeriah Jegatheesan

Trending Scientists