World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
37096
World Ranking
16399
National Ranking
307

Ulf Lekholm publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulf Lekholm sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 114 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ulf Lekholm D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulf Lekholm sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulf Lekholm is affiliated with the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. Their academic profile reflects a focus on scientific research, although specific details regarding papers, topics, or fields of study are not available.

As no recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields, subfields, or main topics of work have been listed, the available information is limited to their institutional connection.

No awards or recognitions have been recorded for Ulf Lekholm at this time.

This concise data suggests an academic presence within the University of Gothenburg, but further information would be required to provide a detailed overview of their research contributions or scholarly activities.

Best Publications

  • A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw

    R. Adell;Ulf Lekholm;B. Rockler;Per-Ingvar Brånemark

  • Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws.

    R Adell;B Eriksson;U Lekholm;P I Brånemark

  • Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants, (I). Success criteria and epidemiology

    Marco Esposito;Jan‐Michaél Hirsch;Ulf Lekholm;Peter Thomsen

  • Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants, (II). Etiopathogenesis

    Marco Esposito;Jan‐Michaél Hirsch;Ulf Lekholm;Peter Thomsen

  • Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses.

    Bertil Friberg;Torsten Jemt;Ulf Lekholm

  • Generation of new bone around titanium implants using a membrane technique: an experimental study in rabbits.

    C Dahlin;L Sennerby;U Lekholm;A Linde

  • Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures.

    van Steenberghe D;Lekholm U;Bolender C;Folmer T

  • Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study.

    R Adell;U Lekholm;B Rockler;P I Brånemark

  • Branemark Novum : a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study

    Per-Ingvar Brånemark;Per Engstrand;Lars-Oluf Öhrnell;Kerstin Gröndahl

  • A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study.

    B. Friberg;L. Sennerby;N. Meredith;N. Meredith;U. Lekholm

  • Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. (II) A cross-sectional retrospective study.

    U. Lekholm;R. Adell;J. Lindhe;P.-I. Brånemark

  • Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures.

    Jemt T;Lekholm U;Adell R

  • Implant Treatment in Edentulous Maxillae: A 5-year Follow-Up Report on Patients With Different Degrees of Jaw Resorption

    T Jemt;U Lekholm

  • Differential diagnosis and treatment strategies for biologic complications and failing oral implants: a review of the literature.

    Marco Esposito;Jan Hirsch;U. Lekholm;P. Thomsen

  • Reconstruction of severely resorbed edentulous maxillae using osseointegrated fixtures in immediate autogenous bone grafts

    R Adell;U Lekholm;K Gröndahl;P I Brånemark

  • Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants. A 2-year longitudinal prospective study.

    Franco Bengazi;Jan L. Wennström;Ulf Lekholm

  • Stability measurements of one-stage Brånemark implants during healing in mandibles: A clinical resonance frequency analysis study

    B. Friberg;L. Sennerby;B. Linden;K. Gröndahl

  • Prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants

    Christer Fransson;Ulf Lekholm;Torsten Jemt;Tord Berglundh

  • The use of e-PTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction sockets: a prospective multicenter study

    Becker W;Dahlin C;Becker Be;Lekholm U

  • Tissue alterations at implant‐supported single‐tooth replacements: a 1‐year prospective clinical study

    Giuseppe Cardaropoli;Ulf Lekholm;Jan L Wennström

Frequent Co-Authors

Lars Sennerby
Lars Sennerby University of Gothenburg
Torsten Jemt
Torsten Jemt University of Gothenburg
Peter Thomsen
Peter Thomsen University of Gothenburg
Tomas Albrektsson
Tomas Albrektsson University of Gothenburg
Jan L. Wennström
Jan L. Wennström University of Gothenburg
Jan Lindhe
Jan Lindhe University of Gothenburg
Thomas A. Davidson
Thomas A. Davidson Aarhus University
Tord Berglundh
Tord Berglundh University of Gothenburg
Sture Nyman
Sture Nyman University of Gothenburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare but looking for flexible study options? Many students exploring Medicine in the USA consider online nursing programs for their affordability and practicality. Choosing the cheapest rn to bsn online can help registered nurses advance their credentials without incurring heavy debt. These programs are designed for working professionals who want to enhance their skills and boost earning potential.

For those aiming for leadership or advanced clinical roles, a Doctor of Nursing Practice is a smart move. Researching the cheapest dnp programs online ensures you get quality education at manageable costs. Similarly, if you already have an RN and want to complete your undergraduate degree quickly and affordably, explore the cheapest rn to bsn programs available today.

Non-nurses interested in entering the profession can look into direct entry master’s degrees. The cheapest direct entry msn programs allow those with a bachelor’s degree in another field to fast-track their transition into nursing. With these varied pathways, there’s an affordable online option to match every healthcare career goal.

Best Scientists Citing Ulf Lekholm

Recently Published Articles