World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
9404
World Ranking
5504
National Ranking
2015

Tori M. Hoehler publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tori M. Hoehler sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 163 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Tori M. Hoehler D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tori M. Hoehler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tori M. Hoehler is a researcher affiliated with the Ames Research Center in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Physics and Astronomy, with a significant focus on subfields including Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials, and Oceanography.

Their research covers multiple main topics including:

  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
  • CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions

Their recent publications include:

  • "Science Goals and Mission Architecture of the Europa Lander Mission Concept" (2022) published in The Planetary Science Journal
  • "The Science Case for a Return to Enceladus" (2021) published in The Planetary Science Journal
  • "Accessing the Subsurface Biosphere Within Rocks Undergoing Active Low-Temperature Serpentinization in the Samail Ophiolite (Oman Drilling Project)" (2021) published in Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • "Oxidation processes diversify the metabolic menu on Enceladus" (2020) published in Icarus
  • "A dynamic microbial sulfur cycle in a serpentinizing continental ophiolite" (2020) published in Environmental Microbiology

Frequent co-authors with whom they have collaborated multiple times include:

  • M. D. Kubo
  • Matthew O. Schrenk
  • Dawn Cardace
  • T. M. McCollom
  • Alexis S. Templeton

Tori M. Hoehler's work appears regularly in several scientific journals, notably:

  • Astrobiology
  • Frontiers in Microbiology
  • The Planetary Science Journal
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • mSystems

Best Publications

  • Field and laboratory studies of methane oxidation in an anoxic marine sediment: evidence for a methanogen-sulfate reducer consortium

    T. M. Hoehler;M. J. Alperin;D. B. Albert;C. S. Martens

  • Microbial Life Under Extreme Energy Limitation

    Tori M. Hoehler;Bo Barker Jorgensen

  • Volatile and organic compositions of sedimentary rocks in Yellowknife Bay, Gale crater, Mars.

    Douglas W. Ming;P. D. Archer;D. P. Glavin;J. L. Eigenbrode

  • Thermodynamic control on hydrogen concentrations in anoxic sediments

    Tori M. Hoehler;Marc J. Alperin;Daniel B. Albert;Christopher S. Martens

  • Life under extreme energy limitation: a synthesis of laboratory- and field-based investigations.

    Mark A. Lever;Karyn L. Rogers;Karen G. Lloyd;Jörg Overmann

  • The NASA Astrobiology Roadmap.

    Unknown

  • Serpentinization and its implications for life on the early Earth and Mars.

    Mitch Schulte;David Blake;Tori M Hoehler;Thomas M McCollom

  • The NASA Roadmap to Ocean Worlds

    Amanda R. Hendrix;Terry A. Hurford;Laura M. Barge;Michael T. Bland

  • The role of microbial mats in the production of reduced gases on the early Earth

    Tori M. Hoehler;Brad M. Bebout;David J. Des Marais

  • Nonequilibrium clumped isotope signals in microbial methane

    David T. Wang;David T. Wang;Danielle S. Gruen;Danielle S. Gruen;Barbara Sherwood Lollar;Kai-Uwe Hinrichs

  • Biological energy requirements as quantitative boundary conditions for life in the subsurface

    T. M. Hoehler

  • Apparent Minimum Free Energy Requirements for Methanogenic Archaea and Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in an Anoxic Marine Sediment

    Tori M. Hoehler;Marc J. Alperin;Daniel B. Albert;Christopher S. Martens

  • Bacterial Calcium Carbonate Precipitation in Cave Environments: A Function of Calcium Homeostasis

    Eric D. Banks;Nicholas M. Taylor;Jason Gulley;Brad R. Lubbers

  • Drivers of Bacterial Maintenance and Minimal Energy Requirements.

    Christopher P. Kempes;Peter M. van Bodegom;David Wolpert;Eric Libby

  • Science Potential from a Europa Lander

    R. T. Pappalardo;S. Vance;F. Bagenal;B. G. Bills

  • An energy balance concept for habitability.

    Tori M. Hoehler

  • Science Goals and Mission Architecture of the Europa Lander Mission Concept

    Unknown

  • Factors that control the stable carbon isotopic composition of methane produced in an anoxic marine sediment

    M. J. Alperin;Neal E. Blair;D. B. Albert;T. M. Hoehler

  • Anaerobic methane oxidation by archaea/sulfate-reducing bacteria aggregates: 1. Thermodynamic and physical constraints

    Marc J. Alperin;Tori M. Hoehler

  • Acetogenesis from CO2 in an anoxic marine sediment

    Tori M. Hoehler;Daniel B. Albert;Marc J. Alperin;Christopher S. Martens

  • Evolutionary tradeoffs in cellular composition across diverse bacteria

    Christopher P Kempes;Christopher P Kempes;Christopher P Kempes;Lawrence Wang;Jan P Amend;John Doyle

  • Significance of anaerobic methane oxidation in methane-rich sediments overlying the Blake Ridge gas hydrates

    Walter S Borowski;Tori M. Hoehler;Mark J. Alperin;Namcy M. Rodriguez

Frequent Co-Authors

Brad M. Bebout
Brad M. Bebout Ames Research Center
Alexis S. Templeton
Alexis S. Templeton University of Colorado Boulder
Thomas M. McCollom
Thomas M. McCollom University of Colorado Boulder
Marc J. Alperin
Marc J. Alperin University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Everett L. Shock
Everett L. Shock Arizona State University
David J. Des Marais
David J. Des Marais Ames Research Center
Eric S. Boyd
Eric S. Boyd Montana State University
Bethany L. Ehlmann
Bethany L. Ehlmann University of Colorado Boulder
Alexander G. Hayes
Alexander G. Hayes Cornell University
Jonathan I. Lunine
Jonathan I. Lunine Jet Propulsion Lab

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an Environmental Sciences degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, many of which can be enhanced through related online programs. For those seeking flexible study options, exploring the what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help identify programs that offer a smoother entry into higher education while still aligning with environmental interests.

Specialized fields like geoscience offer a deeper understanding of Earth systems, and numerous reputable institutions provide top-ranked geoscience online degree options. These programs are designed for students balancing study with other commitments, providing crucial knowledge for careers in environmental consulting, conservation, and research.

In addition, expertise in technology is increasingly vital. The best GIS schools offer programs focused on Geographic Information Systems, a skillset critical for environmental data analysis and resource management. Exploring the best GIS schools can help students find tailored training for this growing field.

For those interested in blending environmental science with public sector leadership, online MPA degrees enable professionals to develop policy and management skills essential for impactful environmental governance. Consider the range of online MPA degrees available to enhance your career trajectory in environmental administration and advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Tori M. Hoehler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles