World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 48 5506 5279 2015 1865 163 9404

Tori M. Hoehler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tori M. Hoehler between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tori M. Hoehler published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2021. 14 of the 180 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2021. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 12 publications
1992 2025

180 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tori M. Hoehler: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 2
2000 8
2001 1
2002 2
2003 3
2004 2
2005 5
2006 3
2007 4
2008 5
2009 7
2010 6
2011 5
2012 4
2013 12
2014 11
2015 4
2016 6
2017 11
2018 12
2019 7
2020 5
2021 21
2022 6
2023 9
2024 2
2025 12
Total 180
Download as CSV

Tori M. Hoehler publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tori M. Hoehler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 163 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444 163
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Tori M. Hoehler D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tori M. Hoehler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272 48
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Tori M. Hoehler is a researcher affiliated with the Ames Research Center in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Physics and Astronomy, with a significant focus on subfields including Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials, and Oceanography.

Their research covers multiple main topics including:

  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
  • CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions

Their recent publications include:

  • "Science Goals and Mission Architecture of the Europa Lander Mission Concept" (2022) published in The Planetary Science Journal
  • "The Science Case for a Return to Enceladus" (2021) published in The Planetary Science Journal
  • "Accessing the Subsurface Biosphere Within Rocks Undergoing Active Low-Temperature Serpentinization in the Samail Ophiolite (Oman Drilling Project)" (2021) published in Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • "Oxidation processes diversify the metabolic menu on Enceladus" (2020) published in Icarus
  • "A dynamic microbial sulfur cycle in a serpentinizing continental ophiolite" (2020) published in Environmental Microbiology

Frequent co-authors with whom they have collaborated multiple times include:

  • M. D. Kubo
  • Matthew O. Schrenk
  • Dawn Cardace
  • T. M. McCollom
  • Alexis S. Templeton

Tori M. Hoehler's work appears regularly in several scientific journals, notably:

  • Astrobiology
  • Frontiers in Microbiology
  • The Planetary Science Journal
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • mSystems

Best Publications

  • Field and laboratory studies of methane oxidation in an anoxic marine sediment: evidence for a methanogen-sulfate reducer consortium

    T. M. Hoehler;M. J. Alperin;D. B. Albert;C. S. Martens

  • Microbial Life Under Extreme Energy Limitation

    Tori M. Hoehler;Bo Barker Jorgensen

  • Volatile and organic compositions of sedimentary rocks in Yellowknife Bay, Gale crater, Mars.

    Douglas W. Ming;P. D. Archer;D. P. Glavin;J. L. Eigenbrode

  • Thermodynamic control on hydrogen concentrations in anoxic sediments

    Tori M. Hoehler;Marc J. Alperin;Daniel B. Albert;Christopher S. Martens

  • Life under extreme energy limitation: a synthesis of laboratory- and field-based investigations.

    Mark A. Lever;Karyn L. Rogers;Karen G. Lloyd;Jörg Overmann

  • The NASA Astrobiology Roadmap.

    Unknown

  • Serpentinization and its implications for life on the early Earth and Mars.

    Mitch Schulte;David Blake;Tori M Hoehler;Thomas M McCollom

  • The NASA Roadmap to Ocean Worlds

    Amanda R. Hendrix;Terry A. Hurford;Laura M. Barge;Michael T. Bland

  • The role of microbial mats in the production of reduced gases on the early Earth

    Tori M. Hoehler;Brad M. Bebout;David J. Des Marais

  • Nonequilibrium clumped isotope signals in microbial methane

    David T. Wang;David T. Wang;Danielle S. Gruen;Danielle S. Gruen;Barbara Sherwood Lollar;Kai-Uwe Hinrichs

  • Biological energy requirements as quantitative boundary conditions for life in the subsurface

    T. M. Hoehler

  • Apparent Minimum Free Energy Requirements for Methanogenic Archaea and Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in an Anoxic Marine Sediment

    Tori M. Hoehler;Marc J. Alperin;Daniel B. Albert;Christopher S. Martens

  • Bacterial Calcium Carbonate Precipitation in Cave Environments: A Function of Calcium Homeostasis

    Eric D. Banks;Nicholas M. Taylor;Jason Gulley;Brad R. Lubbers

  • Drivers of Bacterial Maintenance and Minimal Energy Requirements.

    Christopher P. Kempes;Peter M. van Bodegom;David Wolpert;Eric Libby

  • Science Potential from a Europa Lander

    R. T. Pappalardo;S. Vance;F. Bagenal;B. G. Bills

  • An energy balance concept for habitability.

    Tori M. Hoehler

  • Factors that control the stable carbon isotopic composition of methane produced in an anoxic marine sediment

    M. J. Alperin;Neal E. Blair;D. B. Albert;T. M. Hoehler

  • Anaerobic methane oxidation by archaea/sulfate-reducing bacteria aggregates: 1. Thermodynamic and physical constraints

    Marc J. Alperin;Tori M. Hoehler

  • Acetogenesis from CO2 in an anoxic marine sediment

    Tori M. Hoehler;Daniel B. Albert;Marc J. Alperin;Christopher S. Martens

  • Evolutionary tradeoffs in cellular composition across diverse bacteria

    Christopher P Kempes;Christopher P Kempes;Christopher P Kempes;Lawrence Wang;Jan P Amend;John Doyle

  • Significance of anaerobic methane oxidation in methane-rich sediments overlying the Blake Ridge gas hydrates

    Walter S Borowski;Tori M. Hoehler;Mark J. Alperin;Namcy M. Rodriguez

Frequent Co-Authors

Brad M. Bebout
Brad M. Bebout Ames Research Center
Alexis S. Templeton
Alexis S. Templeton University of Colorado Boulder
Thomas M. McCollom
Thomas M. McCollom University of Colorado Boulder
Marc J. Alperin
Marc J. Alperin University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Everett L. Shock
Everett L. Shock Arizona State University
David J. Des Marais
David J. Des Marais Ames Research Center
Eric S. Boyd
Eric S. Boyd Montana State University
Bethany L. Ehlmann
Bethany L. Ehlmann University of Colorado Boulder
Alexander G. Hayes
Alexander G. Hayes Cornell University
Jonathan I. Lunine
Jonathan I. Lunine Jet Propulsion Lab

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an Environmental Sciences degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, many of which can be enhanced through related online programs. For those seeking flexible study options, exploring the what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help identify programs that offer a smoother entry into higher education while still aligning with environmental interests.

Specialized fields like geoscience offer a deeper understanding of Earth systems, and numerous reputable institutions provide top-ranked geoscience online degree options. These programs are designed for students balancing study with other commitments, providing crucial knowledge for careers in environmental consulting, conservation, and research.

In addition, expertise in technology is increasingly vital. The best GIS schools offer programs focused on Geographic Information Systems, a skillset critical for environmental data analysis and resource management. Exploring the best GIS schools can help students find tailored training for this growing field.

For those interested in blending environmental science with public sector leadership, online MPA degrees enable professionals to develop policy and management skills essential for impactful environmental governance. Consider the range of online MPA degrees available to enhance your career trajectory in environmental administration and advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Tori M. Hoehler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles