World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
54
Citations
10486
World Ranking
3219
National Ranking
954

Thomas F. Golob publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas F. Golob sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 141 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Thomas F. Golob D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas F. Golob sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas F. Golob is affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their academic profile centers on scientific research conducted within this institution.

While specific details regarding their main and subfields of study, recent papers, and topics of work are not listed, the association with a research university such as UC Irvine suggests involvement in scholarly activities at the intersection of academia and specialized research disciplines.

No frequent co-authors or publication venues have been recorded, indicating either individual research efforts or data limitations in these domains.

There is no information available on book publications or awards granted to Thomas F. Golob, and no records of recent paper titles or publication years are currently noted.

This profile reflects a factual summary based on the available data, providing an overview of the scientist's affiliation and research footprint where documented.

Best Publications

  • Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research

    Thomas F Golob

  • The Impact of Residential Density on Vehicle Usage and Energy Consumption

    Unknown

  • DEMAND FOR CLEAN-FUEL VEHICLES IN CALIFORNIA: A DISCRETE-CHOICE STATED PREFERENCE PILOT PROJECT

    David S. Bunch;Mark Bradley;Thomas F. Golob;Ryuichi Kitamura

  • Relationships among urban freeway accidents, traffic flow, weather, and lighting conditions

    Thomas F. Golob;Wilfred W. Recker

  • IMPACTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON PERSONAL TRAVEL AND COMMERCIAL VEHICLE OPERATIONS: RESEARCH CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

    Thomas F. Golob;Amelia C. Regan

  • Drivers’ willingness-to-pay to reduce travel time: evidence from the San Diego I-15 congestion pricing project

    David Brownstone;Arindam Ghosh;Thomas F Golob;Camilla Kazimi

  • A MODEL OF ACTIVITY PARTICIPATION AND TRAVEL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN HOUSEHOLD HEADS

    Thomas F. Golob;Michael G. McNally

  • A simultaneous model of household activity participation and trip chain generation

    Thomas F. Golob

  • An analysis of the severity and incident duration of truck-involved freeway accidents.

    Thomas F. Golob;Wilfred W. Recker;John D. Leonard

  • FREEWAY SAFETY AS A FUNCTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW

    Thomas F. Golob;Wilfred W. Recker;Veronica M. Alvarez

  • A method for relating type of crash to traffic flow characteristics on urban freeways

    Thomas F. Golob;Wilfred W. Recker

  • Bus rapid transit systems: a comparative assessment

    David A. Hensher;Thomas F. Golob;Thomas F. Golob

  • A Transactions Choice Model for Forecasting Demand for Alternative-Fuel Vehicles

    David Brownstone;David S. Bunch;Thomas F. Golob;Weiping Ren

  • Joint models of attitudes and behavior in evaluation of the San diego I-15 congestion pricing project

    Thomas F. Golob

  • THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RIDESHARING INCENTIVES. DISCRETE-CHOICE MODELS OF COMMUTING IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

    David Brownstone;Thomas F. Golob

  • SHOPPING WITHOUT TRAVEL OR TRAVEL WITHOUT SHOPPING? AN INVESTIGATION OF ELECTRONIC HOME SHOPPING

    Jane Gould;Thomas F. Golob

  • The Trip Chaining Activity of Sydney Residents: A Cross- Section Assessment by Age Group with a focus on Seniors

    Thomas F Golob;David A Hensher

  • Greenhouse gas emissions and australian commuters’ attitudes and behavior concerning abatement policies and personal involvement

    Thomas F. Golob;David A. Hensher

  • The Dynamics of Household Travel Time Expenditures and Car Ownership Decisions

    Thomas F. Golob

  • Trucking industry adoption of information technology: a multivariate discrete choice model

    Thomas F. Golob;Amelia C. Regan

  • How Households Use Different Types of Vehicles: A Structural Driver Allocation and Usage Model - eScholarship

    Thomas F. Golob;Seyoung K. Kim;Weiping Ren

Frequent Co-Authors

Wilfred W. Recker
Wilfred W. Recker University of California, Irvine
David A. Hensher
David A. Hensher University of Sydney
Arindam Ghosh
Arindam Ghosh Curtin University
Genevieve Giuliano
Genevieve Giuliano University of Southern California
Martin Wachs
Martin Wachs University of California, Los Angeles
John M. Quigley
John M. Quigley University of California, Berkeley
Toshiyuki Yamamoto
Toshiyuki Yamamoto Nagoya University
John W. Polak
John W. Polak Imperial College London
John P. Robinson
John P. Robinson University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Engineering and Technology can open new doors for your career, offering flexibility and affordability. One option is pursuing an online masters in communications. This degree can help engineers and tech professionals excel in cross-team collaboration, digital communications, and project reporting.

For those interested in business leadership, an mba in entrepreneurship provides the skills to launch your own tech startup or lead innovation teams. If standardized tests are a concern, consider an online mba without gmat, which removes barriers for busy professionals while still delivering a competitive business education.

Effective management is crucial in technology projects. Choosing a cheap project management degree online allows you to learn industry-standard methodologies without significant financial investment. These pathways can enhance your technical credentials, broaden your career prospects, and help you adapt to today's rapidly changing engineering landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas F. Golob

Recently Published Articles