World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
9771
World Ranking
6506
National Ranking
515

Thomas A. Hanley publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas A. Hanley sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 65 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Thomas A. Hanley D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas A. Hanley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas A. Hanley is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia. The scientist's academic profile reflects an engagement with research primarily through their institutional association.

No detailed information regarding recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues is available, which limits the overview of their specific research output or collaborations.

Similarly, there is no data concerning book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or main research topics associated with Thomas A. Hanley, thus restricting insight into the subject areas or thematic focus of their work.

There are no records of awards or honors linked to Thomas A. Hanley in the data provided.

This concise profile is based solely on affiliation data and represents a factual summary of available public academic information.

Best Publications

  • Role of Tannins in Defending Plants Against Ruminants: Reduction in Protein Availability

    C. T. Robbins;T. A. Hanley;A. E. Hagerman;O. Hjeljord

  • Energy expenditures for locomotion by mule deer and elk

    Katherine L. Parker;Charles T. Robbins;Thomas A. Hanley

  • PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS IN RIPARIAN WETLANDS—A TEST OF BIODIVERSITY THEORY

    Michael M. Pollock;Robert J. Naiman;Thomas A. Hanley

  • The importance of meat, particularly salmon, to body size, population productivity, and conservation of North American brown bears

    G V Hilderbrand;C C Schwartz;C T Robbins;M E Jacoby

  • USE OF STABLE ISOTOPES TO DETERMINE DIETS OF LIVING AND EXTINCT BEARS

    G. V. Hilderbrand;S. D. Farley;C. T. Robbins;T. A. Hanley

  • Role of tannins in defending plants against ruminants: reduction in dry matter digestion?

    C. T. Robbins;S. Mole;A. E. Hagerman;T. A. Hanley

  • Role of brown bears (Ursus arctos) in the flow of marine nitrogen into a terrestrial ecosystem.

    Grant V. Hilderbrand;Thomas A. Hanley;Charles T. Robbins;Charles C. Schwartz

  • Variation in Mammalian Physiological Responses to a Condensed Tannin and Its Ecological Implications

    C. T. Robbins;A. E. Hagerman;P. J. Austin;C. McArthur

  • Fertilization of terrestrial vegetation by spawning Pacific salmon: the role of flooding and predator activity.

    M. Ben-David;T.A. Hanley;D.M. Schell

  • Food Intake and Foraging Energetics of Elk and Mule Deer

    Mark L. Wickstrom;Charles T. Robbins;Thomas A. Hanley;Donald E. Spalinger

  • Habitat evaluation: do use/availability data reflect carrying capacity?

    N. Thompson Hobbs;Thomas A. Hanley

  • Feeding-patch choice by red deer in relation to foraging efficiency : An experiment.

    Rolf Langvatn;Thomas A. Hanley

  • Trophic relations of brown and black bears in several western North American Ecosystems

    Michael E. Jacoby;Grant V. Hilderbrand;Christopher Servheen;Charles C. Schwartz

  • Predicting digestible protein and digestible dry matter in tannin-containing forages consumed by ruminants

    Thomas A. Hanley;Charles T. Robbins;Ann E. Hagerman;Clare McArthur

  • Seasonal changes in diets of coastal and riverine mink: the role of spawning Pacific salmon

    M. Ben-David;T. A. Hanley;D. R. Klein;D. M. Schell

  • A nutritional view of understanding and complexity in the problem of diet selection by deer (Cervidae)

    Unknown

  • Effect of seasonal differences in dietary meat intake on changes in body mass and composition in wild and captive brown bears

    Grant V. Hilderbrand;S.G. Jenkins;C.C. Schwartz;Thomas A. Hanley

  • ANALYSIS OF THE FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE IN FORAGING IN THE SITKA BLACK-TAILED DEER'

    D. E. Spalinger;T. A. Hanley;C. T. Robbins

  • The assessment of handling time in ruminants: the effect of plant chemical and physical structure on the rate of breakdown of plant particles in the rumen of mule deer and elk

    Donald E. Spalinger;Charles T. Robbins;Thomas A. Hanley

  • Effect of hibernation and reproductive status on body mass and condition of coastal brown bears

    Grant V. Hilderbrand;Charles C. Schwartz;Charles T. Robbins;Thomas A. Hanley

  • Diet selection by a ruminant generalist browser in relation to plant chemistry

    C. McArthur;C. T. Robbins;A. E. Hagerman;T. A. Hanley

Frequent Co-Authors

Knut Kielland
Knut Kielland University of Alaska Fairbanks
T. Scott Rupp
T. Scott Rupp University of Alaska Fairbanks
Takashi Gomi
Takashi Gomi Nagoya University
Erik A. Beever
Erik A. Beever United States Geological Survey
Clare McArthur
Clare McArthur University of Sydney
A. David McGuire
A. David McGuire University of Alaska Fairbanks
Patrick F. Sullivan
Patrick F. Sullivan University of Alaska Anchorage
Teresa N. Hollingsworth
Teresa N. Hollingsworth German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina
Ann E. Hagerman
Ann E. Hagerman Miami University
Eugénie S. Euskirchen
Eugénie S. Euskirchen University of Alaska Fairbanks

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in ecology and evolution often explore related fields through online degrees, expanding their career pathways. Digital skills remain in high demand, and a graphic design degree online can be a unique complement for those interested in scientific visualization and communication.

Interdisciplinary programs are another popular choice, with flexibility to tailor coursework for specialized interests. Many consider an online interdisciplinary studies tuition costs to find an affordable route that matches their career goals.

Historians and researchers in evolution or conservation may benefit from a masters in history, opening opportunities in education, museums, or public outreach.

Information management is another vital area. For those fascinated by organizing scientific data or literature, understanding the cost of mlis degree us (Master of Library and Information Science) is useful. Each of these paths can enhance your employability in the evolving field of ecology and evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas A. Hanley

Recently Published Articles