World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
66
Citations
20457
World Ranking
8507
National Ranking
3826

Theodore T. Puck publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theodore T. Puck sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 193 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Theodore T. Puck D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theodore T. Puck sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1984 - E.B. Wilson Medal, American Society for Cell Biology
  • 1974 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 1973 - Louisa Gross Horwitz Prize, Columbia University
  • 1960 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1958 - Albert Lasker Award for Basic Medical Research, Lasker Foundation
  • 1949 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Theodore T. Puck was affiliated with the Roosevelt Institute in the United States. Throughout their career, they made significant contributions to scientific research, particularly in the fields associated with their main institutional affiliation.

No records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications associated with Theodore T. Puck are available from the provided data.

Theodore T. Puck was recognized with several awards over their lifetime. These include the E.B. Wilson Medal from the American Society for Cell Biology in 1984, membership in the National Academy of Medicine since 1974, and the Louisa Gross Horwitz Prize from Columbia University awarded in 1973. Earlier recognitions comprise election as a member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1960, the Albert Lasker Award for Basic Medical Research from the Lasker Foundation in 1958, and being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1949.

The available data confirms that Theodore T. Puck is deceased. Their contributions remain documented within the scientific community through these honors and institutional records.

Best Publications

  • Action of x-rays on mammalian cells.

    Theodore T. Puck;Philip I. Marcus

  • Clonal growth of mammalian cells in vitro; growth characteristics of colonies from single HeLa cells with and without a feeder layer.

    Theodore T. Puck;Philip I. Marcus;Steven J. Cieciura

  • GENETICS OF SOMATIC MAMMALIAN CELLS III. LONG-TERM CULTIVATION OF EUPLOID CELLS FROM HUMAN AND ANIMAL SUBJECTS

    Theodore T. Puck;Steven J. Cieciura;Arthur Robinson

  • A RAPID METHOD FOR VIABLE CELL TITRATION AND CLONE PRODUCTION WITH HELA CELLS IN TISSUE CULTURE: THE USE OF X-IRRADIATED CELLS TO SUPPLY CONDITIONING FACTORS.

    Theodore T. Puck;Philip I. Marcus

  • Morphological Transformation of Chinese Hamster Cells by Dibutyryl Adenosine Cyclic 3′:5′-Monophosphate and Testosterone

    Abraham W. Hsie;Theodore T. Puck

  • Genetics of Somatic Mammalian Cells, VII. Induction and Isolation of Nutritional Mutants in Chinese Hamster Cells

    Fa-Ten Kao;Theodore T. Puck

  • GENETICS OF SOMATIC MAMMALIAN CELLS : II. CHROMOSOMAL CONSTITUTION OF CELLS IN TISSUE CULTURE

    J. H. Tjio;Theodore T. Puck

  • Clonal growth in vitro of human cells with fibroblastic morphology; comparison of growth and genetic characteristics of single epithelioid and fibroblast-like cells from a variety of human organs.

    Theodore T. Puck;Steven J. Cieciura;Harold W. Fisher

  • Life Cycle Analysis of Mammalian Cells: III. The Inhibition of Division in Chinese Hamster Cells by Puromycin and Actinomycin

    R.A. Tobey;D.F. Petersen;E.C. Anderson;T.T. Puck

  • Genetics of somatic mammalian cells. IX. Quantitation of mutagenesis by physical and chemical agents

    Fa‐Ten Kao;Theodore T. Puck

  • The mechanism of virus attachment to host cells. I. The role of ions in the primary reaction.

    Theodore T. Puck;Alan Garen;Jewell Cline

  • ACTION OF X-RAYS ON MAMMALIAN CELLS : II. SURVIVAL CURVES OF CELLS FROM NORMAL HUMAN TISSUES

    Theodore T. Puck;Dimitry Morkovin;Philip I. Marcus;Steven J. Cieciura

  • A PROPOSED STANDARD SYSTEM OF NOMENCLATURE OF HUMAN MITOTIC CHROMOSOMES

    J. Lejeune;A. Levan;J.A. Böök;E.H.Y. Chu

  • Genetics of somatic mammalian cells. V. Treatment with 5-bromodeoxyuridine and visible light for isolation of nutritionally deficient mutants.

    Theodore T. Puck;Fa-Ten Kao

  • Further Changes in Differentiation State Accompanying the Conversion of Chinese Hamster Cells to Fibroblastic Form by Dibutyryl Adenosine Cyclic 3′:5′-Monophosphate and Hormones

    Abraham W. Hsie;Carol Jones;Theodore T. Puck

  • Clonal growth in vitro of epithelial cells from normal human tissues.

    Philip I. Marcus;Steven J. Cieciura;Theodore T. Puck

  • An electron microscope study of the effects of dibutyryl cyclic AMP on Chinese Hamster Ovary cells

    Keith R. Porter;T.T. Puck;A.W. Hsie;Donna Kelley

  • Isolation and localization of DNA segments from specific human chromosomes

    James F. Gusella;Cheryl Keys;Aviva Varsanyi-Breiner;Fa-Ten Kao

  • MOLECULAR GROWTH REQUIREMENTS OF SINGLE MAMMALIAN CELLS: THE ACTION OF FETUIN IN PROMOTING CELL ATTACHMENT TO GLASS.

    Harold W. Fisher;Theodore T. Puck;Gordon Sato

  • [9] Quantitative colonial growth of isolated mammalian cells☆

    Richard G. Ham;Theodore T. Puck

Frequent Co-Authors

James F. Gusella
James F. Gusella Harvard University
Jacqueline F. Sinclair
Jacqueline F. Sinclair Dartmouth College
Brian Storrie
Brian Storrie University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Peter R. Sinclair
Peter R. Sinclair Dartmouth College
Alison Goate
Alison Goate Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
James C. Willey
James C. Willey University of Toledo
Curtis C. Harris
Curtis C. Harris National Institutes of Health
Gordon Sato
Gordon Sato University of California, San Diego
Lawrence Chan
Lawrence Chan Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens the door to a wide array of online degrees and specialized career paths in the health sciences. Whether you’re interested in data, patient care, or nutrition, there are flexible educational programs to help you achieve your goals.

For those drawn to the intersection of science and technology, consider an online health information management degree. This path combines healthcare and information systems, preparing graduates for essential roles in managing patient data. Nutrition enthusiasts might pursue a masters in nutrition online, leading to diverse opportunities in research, counseling, and wellness.

Allied health careers are also growing rapidly. Students can train as diagnostic professionals by enrolling in an online ultrasound tech school, or prepare for imaging roles with online rad tech programs. These degrees offer strong job prospects and are ideal for those interested in technology and patient care.

Exploring online options allows for flexibility and accessibility, making it easier to balance studies, work, and life while pursuing a rewarding science-based career.

Best Scientists Citing Theodore T. Puck

Recently Published Articles