World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
49
Citations
8051
World Ranking
18068
National Ranking
7388

Brian Storrie publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Storrie sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 155 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Brian Storrie D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Storrie sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian Storrie is affiliated with the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in the United States. Their primary research focus is in the field of Medicine, with specific expertise in subfields such as Hematology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Internal Medicine, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's work has significantly contributed to understanding platelet function, blood properties, and coagulation mechanisms. Key research topics include:

  • Platelet Disorders and Treatments
  • Blood properties and coagulation
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis
  • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Cell Adhesion Molecules Research

Brian Storrie has authored numerous publications in various scientific venues, with a notable focus on platelet biology and blood-related disorders. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Blood
  • Biophysical Journal
  • Platelets
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Visualized Experiments

Among recent papers are:

  • Dense cellular segmentation for EM using 2D-3D neural network ensembles, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Rab6 is required for rapid, cisternal-specific, intra-Golgi cargo transport, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Platelet α-granule cargo packaging and release are affected by the luminal proteoglycan, serglycin, 2021, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • Venous puncture wound hemostasis results in a vaulted thrombus structured by locally nucleated platelet aggregates, 2021, Communications Biology
  • Structural analysis of resting mouse platelets by 3D-EM reveals an unexpected variation in α-granule shape, 2020, Platelets

Frequent collaborative relationships have been established with researchers including Irina D. Pokrovskaya, Maria A. Aronova, Richard D. Leapman, Sidney W. Whiteheart, and Sung W. Rhee.

Best Publications

  • Isolation of subcellular organelles.

    B Storrie;E A Madden

  • Evidence for a COP-I-independent transport route from the Golgi complex to the endoplasmic reticulum

    A Girod;B Storrie;J C Simpson;L Johannes

  • Recycling of Golgi-resident Glycosyltransferases through the ER Reveals a Novel Pathway and Provides an Explanation for Nocodazole-induced Golgi Scattering

    Brian Storrie;Jamie White;Sabine Röttger;Ernst H.K. Stelzer

  • Evidence that differential packaging of the major platelet granule proteins von Willebrand factor and fibrinogen can support their differential release

    S. Sehgal;B. Storrie

  • Three-dimensional holographic fluorescence microscope

    Ting-Chung Poon;Bradley Schilling;Guy Indebetouw;Brian Storrie

  • A functional barrier to movement of lipids in polarized neurons.

    Toshihide Kobayashi;Brian Storrie;Kai Simons;Carlos G. Dotti

  • Bortezomib down-regulates the cell surface expression of HLA-class I and enhances natural killer cell-mediated lysis of myeloma

    Jumei Shi;Guido J. Tricot;Tarun K. Garg;Priyangi A. Malaviarachchi

  • The biogenesis of lysosomes: Is it a kiss and run, continuous fusion and fission process?

    Brian Storrie;Michel Desjardins

  • In Vitro Fusion of Phagosomes with Different Endocytic Organelles from J774 Macrophages

    Andrea Jahraus;Torunn E. Tjelle;Trond Berg;Anja Habermann

  • Quantitative immunofluorescence mapping reveals little functional coclustering of proteins within platelet α-granules

    Jeffrey Kamykowski;Peter Carlton;Siddharth Sehgal;Brian Storrie

  • Evidence for retrograde traffic between terminal lysosomes and the prelysosomal/late endosome compartment.

    A. Jahraus;B. Storrie;G. Griffiths;M. Desjardins

  • Localization and Recycling of gp27 (hp24γ3): Complex Formation with Other p24 Family Members

    Joachim Füllekrug;Tatsuo Suganuma;Bor Luen Tang;Wanjing Hong

  • Evidence that the entire Golgi apparatus cycles in interphase HeLa cells: sensitivity of Golgi matrix proteins to an ER exit block.

    Suzanne Miles;Heather McManus;Kimberly E. Forsten;Brian Storrie

  • Are Rab proteins the link between Golgi organization and membrane trafficking

    Shijie Liu;Brian Storrie

  • Identification of rabaptin-5, rabex-5, and GM130 as putative effectors of rab33b, a regulator of retrograde traffic between the Golgi apparatus and ER.

    Rebekka Valsdottir;Hitoshi Hashimoto;Keith Ashman;Toshiaki Koda

  • Autophagy is induced upon platelet activation and is essential for hemostasis and thrombosis.

    Madhu M. Ouseph;Yunjie Huang;Meenakshi Banerjee;Smita Joshi

  • Highly activated and expanded natural killer cells for multiple myeloma immunotherapy

    Tarun K. Garg;Susann M. Szmania;Junaid A. Khan;Antje Hoering

  • Expression of the mitochondrial genome in HeLa cells. 13. Effect of selective inhibition of cytoplasmic or mitochondrial protein synthesis on mitochondrial nucleic acid synthesis.

    Brian Storrie;Giuseppe Attardi

  • Exocytosis of pinocytic contents by Chinese hamster ovary cells

    C J Adams;K M Maurey;B Storrie

  • Breaking the COPI monopoly on Golgi recycling

    Brian Storrie;Rainer Pepperkok;Tommy Nilsson

Frequent Co-Authors

Sidney W. Whiteheart
Sidney W. Whiteheart University of Kentucky
Giuseppe Attardi
Giuseppe Attardi California Institute of Technology
Rainer Pepperkok
Rainer Pepperkok European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Frits van Rhee
Frits van Rhee University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Thomas E. Kreis
Thomas E. Kreis University of Geneva
Paul A. Gleeson
Paul A. Gleeson University of Melbourne
Arend Mulder
Arend Mulder Leiden University Medical Center
Ernst H. K. Stelzer
Ernst H. K. Stelzer Goethe University Frankfurt
Gareth Griffiths
Gareth Griffiths University of Oslo
Michel Desjardins
Michel Desjardins University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Graduates of Biology and Biochemistry programs in the USA have a range of advanced, online study options tailored to their interests and career goals. For those aiming to move into management or administrative roles within healthcare, pursuing one of the number of cahme accredited mha programs can open doors to leadership and policy-making positions.

Students interested in nursing have flexible options, such as online dnp programs without dissertation, which allow professionals to advance their education and practical skills without the typical clinical or research thesis requirements.

If you're drawn to research, teaching, or top-level management in healthcare, consider a phd in healthcare management or similar doctorate-level pathway to specialize and grow your impact in the field.

Pharmacy is also a sought-after profession for science graduates. Flexible pharm d online programs make it feasible to earn advanced pharmacy credentials no matter where you live—leading to lucrative and respected career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Brian Storrie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles