H-Index & Metrics

H-Index & Metrics

Discipline name H-index Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Law and Political Science D-index 23 Citations 8,435 46 World Ranking 1017 National Ranking 606

Research.com Recognitions

Awards & Achievements

2008 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

2006 - Heinz I. Eulau Award, American Political Science Association (APSA)

2003 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Politics
  • Democracy
  • Law

Her scientific interests lie mostly in Politics, Political economy, Public administration, Democracy and Comparative politics. Many of her research projects under Politics are closely connected to Contingent vote, Cash and Advertising with Contingent vote, Cash and Advertising, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. Her Political economy study incorporates themes from Democratic theory and Latin Americans.

She has included themes like Voting and Accountability in her Public administration study. Her work deals with themes such as Political philosophy and Law and economics, which intersect with Accountability. Susan C. Stokes works mostly in the field of Democracy, limiting it down to concerns involving Representation and, occasionally, Parliament and Separation of powers.

Her most cited work include:

  • Democracy, accountability, and representation (1070 citations)
  • Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina (816 citations)
  • Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America (396 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Political economy, Politics, Public administration, Democracy and Comparative politics. She has researched Political economy in several fields, including Democratic theory, Latin Americans, Law, Development economics and Economic system. The Politics study combines topics in areas such as Competition, Monopoly and Mandate.

Her research integrates issues of Political machine, Voting, Presidential system and Accountability in her study of Public administration. Her Democracy study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Government, Separation of powers, Representation and Social psychology. She combines subjects such as New Deal, State formation, Political philosophy, Political culture and Clientelism with her study of Comparative politics.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Political economy (42.19%)
  • Politics (42.19%)
  • Public administration (40.62%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2016-2020)?

  • Political economy (42.19%)
  • Democracy (37.50%)
  • Politics (42.19%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Her primary areas of study are Political economy, Democracy, Politics, Power and Survey data collection. Her studies deal with areas such as Legitimacy and Presidential system as well as Political economy. Her research in Democracy intersects with topics in Government, Campaign finance and State.

Her Law and economics research extends to the thematically linked field of Politics. Her work carried out in the field of Power brings together such families of science as Electoral college and Democratic legitimacy. Her Voting research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Test, Collective action, New Deal and Accountability.

Between 2016 and 2020, her most popular works were:

  • Why Do People Join Backlash Protests? Lessons from Turkey: (22 citations)
  • Searching for Bright Lines in the Trump Presidency (13 citations)
  • Protests and Repression in New Democracies (11 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Politics
  • Democracy
  • Law

Susan C. Stokes spends much of her time researching Political economy, Power, Backlash, Politics and Law. The study incorporates disciplines such as Incentive and Democracy in addition to Political economy. Incentive is closely attributed to Authoritarianism in her study.

The concepts of her Democracy study are interwoven with issues in Perception, Consensus theory, Presidency, Separation of powers and Polarization. In her research, she performs multidisciplinary study on Polarization and Survey data collection. Her work on Social movement as part of general Law research is often related to Join, thus linking different fields of science.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Susan C. Stokes

Staffan I. Lindberg

Staffan I. Lindberg

University of Gothenburg

Publications: 26

Philip Keefer

Philip Keefer

Inter-American Development Bank

Publications: 13

Mariano Tommasi

Mariano Tommasi

University of San Andrés

Publications: 12

Miriam A. Golden

Miriam A. Golden

University of California, Los Angeles

Publications: 12

Scott Mainwaring

Scott Mainwaring

University of Notre Dame

Publications: 11

James Raymond Vreeland

James Raymond Vreeland

Princeton University

Publications: 11

Jesse C. Ribot

Jesse C. Ribot

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Publications: 10

Marc Hooghe

Marc Hooghe

KU Leuven

Publications: 9

Christopher Wlezien

Christopher Wlezien

The University of Texas at Austin

Publications: 9

David J. Samuels

David J. Samuels

University of Minnesota

Publications: 9

Stuart Soroka

Stuart Soroka

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

Publications: 9

Kurt Weyland

Kurt Weyland

The University of Texas at Austin

Publications: 9

Pippa Norris

Pippa Norris

Harvard University

Publications: 9

Joshua A. Tucker

Joshua A. Tucker

New York University

Publications: 9

Anthony M. Bertelli

Anthony M. Bertelli

Pennsylvania State University

Publications: 9

Mark Bovens

Mark Bovens

Utrecht University

Publications: 8

Something went wrong. Please try again later.