World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
80
Citations
21662
World Ranking
4112
National Ranking
2019

Stuart McLaughlin publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart McLaughlin sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 133 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Stuart McLaughlin D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart McLaughlin sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stuart McLaughlin is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States and has contributed to research primarily within the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans topics such as RNA Research and Splicing, Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, as well as COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction, Reproductive System and Pregnancy, and Reproductive Biology and Fertility.

Recent publications by McLaughlin include:

  • "Dual role for phosphoinositides in regulation of yeast and mammalian phospholipase D enzymes," 2020, UNC Libraries
  • "REFLECTIONS ON THE CHALLENGES OF HEADSHIP," 2023, The Buckingham Journal of Education
  • "Nucleotide GPT: Sequence-Based Deep Learning Prediction of Nuclear Subcompartment-Associated Genome Architecture," 2024, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Paternal SARS-CoV-2 infection impacts sperm small noncoding RNAs and increases anxiety in offspring in a sex-dependent manner," 2025, Nature Communications

McLaughlin's research has appeared in various venues, including:

  • UNC Libraries
  • The Buckingham Journal of Education
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Vicki A. Sciorra
  • Simon A. Rudge
  • Jiyao Wang
  • Jo Anne Engebrecht
  • Andrew J. Morris

McLaughlin's work engages multidisciplinary subfields such as Molecular Biology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Immunology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. This broad scope reflects an integrated approach to molecular and reproductive biology with implications for health sciences.

Best Publications

  • The electrostatic properties of membranes.

    Stuart McLaughlin

  • Plasma membrane phosphoinositide organization by protein electrostatics

    Stuart McLaughlin;Diana Murray

  • PIP2 and Proteins: Interactions, Organization, and Information Flow

    Stuart McLaughlin;Jiyao Wang;Alok Gambhir;Diana Murray

  • The myristoyl-electrostatic switch: a modulator of reversible protein-membrane interactions

    Stuart McLaughlin;Alan Aderem

  • Adsorption of monovalent cations to bilayer membranes containing negative phospholipids.

    Moises Eisenberg;Thomas Gresalfi;Thomas Riccio;Stuart McLaughlin

  • Binding of acylated peptides and fatty acids to phospholipid vesicles : pertinence to myristoylated proteins

    Robert M. Peitzsch;Stuart McLaughlin

  • Adsorption of divalent cations to bilayer membranes containing phosphatidylserine

    S McLaughlin;N Mulrine;T Gresalfi;G Vaio

  • Transport of protons across membranes by weak acids.

    S G McLaughlin;J P Dilger

  • THE PLECKSTRIN HOMOLOGY DOMAIN OF PHOSPHOLIPASE C-DELTA 1 BINDS WITH HIGH AFFINITY TO PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 4,5-BISPHOSPHATE IN BILAYER MEMBRANES

    Pilar Garcia;Rakesh Gupta;Shefali Shah;Andrew J. Morris

  • Binding of small basic peptides to membranes containing acidic lipids: theoretical models and experimental results

    N. Ben-Tal;B. Honig;R.M. Peitzsch;G. Denisov

  • Electrostatic sequestration of PIP2 on phospholipid membranes by basic/aromatic regions of proteins.

    Alok Gambhir;Gyöngyi Hangyás-Mihályné;Irina Zaitseva;David S. Cafiso

  • Amino-terminal basic residues of Src mediate membrane binding through electrostatic interaction with acidic phospholipids

    Catherine T. Sigal;Wenjun Zhou;Carolyn A. Buser;Stuart McLaughlin

  • Binding of peptides with basic residues to membranes containing acidic phospholipids

    Jiyun Kim;M. Mosior;L. A. Chung;Hui Wu

  • Binding of neomycin to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate (PIP2)

    Eugene Gabev;John Kasianowicz;Tammy Abbott;Stuart McLaughlin

  • The adsorption of divalent cations to phosphatidylcholine bilayer membranes

    Alan McLaughlin;Christoph Grathwohl;Stuart McLaughlin

  • Lateral sequestration of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate by the basic effector domain of myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate is due to nonspecific electrostatic interactions.

    Jiyao Wang;Alok Gambhir;Gyöngyi Hangyás-Mihályné;Diana Murray

  • Electrostatic interaction of myristoylated proteins with membranes: simple physics, complicated biology

    Diana Murray;Nir Ben-Tal;Barry Honig;Stuart McLaughlin

  • Binding of basic peptides to membranes produces lateral domains enriched in the acidic lipids phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate: an electrostatic model and experimental results.

    G. Denisov;S. Wanaski;P. Luan;M. Glaser

  • Myristoylated Alanine-rich C Kinase Substrate (MARCKS) Produces Reversible Inhibition of Phospholipase C by Sequestering Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate in Lateral Domains

    Michael Glaser;Stephen Wanaski;Carolyn A. Buser;Valentina Boguslavsky

  • Membrane curvature: how BAR domains bend bilayers.

    Joshua Zimmerberg;Stuart McLaughlin

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Cafiso
David S. Cafiso University of Virginia
Andrew J. Morris
Andrew J. Morris University of Kentucky
Barry Honig
Barry Honig Columbia University
Wonpil Im
Wonpil Im Lehigh University
Richard W. Pastor
Richard W. Pastor National Institutes of Health
Nir Ben-Tal
Nir Ben-Tal Tel Aviv University
Alan Aderem
Alan Aderem Seattle Children's Hospital
Steven O. Smith
Steven O. Smith Stony Brook University
Roland Benz
Roland Benz Jacobs University
Joachim O. Rädler
Joachim O. Rädler Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry often leads to diverse professional opportunities. Many students look for flexible options, like a 2 year nutrition degree online that can help jumpstart a career in health, wellness, or research fields. These online programs enable learners to balance education with personal and work responsibilities.

Another popular advancement route is pursuing an affordable online mba in healthcare management. This degree is ideal for science graduates wanting leadership roles in hospitals, labs, or biotech companies, supporting career growth while managing tuition costs.

For those interested in medical data, certifications such as CPC and CCS are valuable credentials. Understanding the difference between cpc vs ccs certification is key for anyone considering medical coding or billing. Each pathway offers unique benefits, costs, and salary prospects.

Overall, jobs in healthcare data and records are in demand. Research shows that a medical.coder salary remains competitive, with abundant opportunities for growth. Choosing the right online degree and certification can open multiple rewarding paths in science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart McLaughlin

Recently Published Articles