World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
6948
World Ranking
7909
National Ranking
4242

Stephen Kulis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Kulis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 148 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephen Kulis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen Kulis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen Kulis is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in medicine, psychology, and health professions. Their work spans several interdisciplinary subfields including clinical psychology, general health professions, epidemiology, electrical and electronic engineering, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's research focuses on substance abuse treatment and outcomes, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, community health and development, health policy implementation science, racial and ethnic identity research, prenatal substance exposure effects, and smoking behavior and cessation.

Stephen Kulis has published research in several academic venues, frequently appearing in:

  • Journal of Instrumentation
  • Prevention Science
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Journal of Prevention
  • Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Kulis include the following:

  • Keepin' It REAL-Mantente REAL in Mexico: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of a Culturally Adapted Substance Use Prevention Curriculum for Early Adolescents, 2021, Prevention Science
  • Testing a Culturally Adapted Youth Substance Use Prevention Program in a Mexican Border City: Mantente REAL, 2020, Substance Use & Misuse

Collaborators frequently working with Stephen Kulis include:

  • Flavio F. Marsiglia
  • Olalla Cutrín
  • Stephanie L. Ayers
  • María Elena Medina-Mora
  • José Antonio Gómez Fraguela

Kulis's contributions explore the applicability of prevention programs targeting early adolescents and community health challenges, especially in culturally diverse contexts. Their work addresses behavioral and emotional problems in youth by examining factors such as parental support and knowledge within longitudinal frameworks.

Best Publications

  • Culturally Grounded Substance Use Prevention: An Evaluation of the keepin' it R.E.A.L. Curriculum

    Michael L. Hecht;Flavio Francisco Marsiglia;Elvira Elek;David A. Wagstaff

  • Technology, Proximity, and Measures of Kin Support.

    Eugene Litwak;Stephen Kulis

  • Ethnic Labels and Ethnic Identity as Predictors of Drug Use among Middle School Students in the Southwest.

    Flavio Francisco Marsiglia;Stephen Kulis;Michael L. Hecht

  • More Than a Pipeline Problem: Labor Supply Constraints and Gender Stratification Across Academic Science Disciplines

    Stephen Kulis;Diane Sicotte;Shawn Collins

  • Ethnicity and ethnic identity as predictors of drug norms and drug use among preadolescents in the US Southwest.

    Flavio Francisco Marsiglia;Stephen Kulis;Michael L. Hecht;Stephen Sills

  • Perceived ethnic discrimination versus acculturation stress: influences on substance use among Latino youth in the Southwest.

    Stephen Kulis;Flavio Francisco Marsiglia;Tanya Nieri

  • God Forbid! Substance Use Among Religious and Nonreligious Youth

    Flavio Francisco Marsiglia;Stephen Kulis;Tanya Nieri;Monica Parsai

  • The protective and risk effects of parents and peers on substance use, attitudes and behaviors of Mexican and Mexican American female and male adolescents.

    Monica Parsai;Sarah Voisine;Flavio F. Marsiglia;Stephen Kulis

  • Effects of Familism and Family Cohesion on Problem Behaviors among Adolescents in Mexican Immigrant Families in the Southwest U.S.

    Flavio Francisco Marsiglia;Monica Parsai;Stephen Kulis

  • Ethnic pride, biculturalism, and drug use norms of urban American Indian adolescents

    Stephen Kulis;Maria Napoli;Flavio Francisco Marsiglia

  • Mexican/Mexican American Adolescents and keepin' it REAL: An Evidence-Based Substance Use Prevention Program

    Stephen Kulis;Flavio F. Marsiglia;Elvira Elek;Patricia Dustman

  • Gender Identity, Ethnicity, Acculturation, and Drug Use: Exploring Differences among Adolescents in the Southwest.

    Stephen Kulis;Flavio Francisco Marsiglia;Donna Hurdle

  • Physician satisfaction in a changing health care environment : The impact of challenges to professional autonomy, authority, and dominance

    Mary Guptill Warren;Rose Weitz;Stephen Kulis

  • A Continuum of Approaches Toward Developing Culturally Focused Prevention Interventions: From Adaptation to Grounding

    Scott K. Okamoto;Stephen Kulis;Flavio F. Marsiglia;Lori K. Holleran Steiker

  • Women scientists in academia: Geographically constrained to big cities, college clusters, or the coasts?

    Stephen Kulis;Diane Sicotte

  • Sense of Belonging in School as a Protective Factor Against Drug Abuse Among Native American Urban Adolescents

    Maria Napoli;Flavio Francisco Marsiglia;Stephen Kulis

  • Neighborhood Effects on Youth Substance Use in a Southwestern City

    Stephen Kulis;Flavio Francisco Marsiglia;Diane Sicotte;Tanya Nieri

  • Hopelessness, Family Stress, and Depression among Mexican-Heritage Mothers in the Southwest

    Flavio F. Marsiglia;Stephen Kulis;Hilda Garcia Perez;Monica Bermudez-Parsai

  • Spirituality and religion: intertwined protective factors for substance use among urban American Indian youth.

    Stephen Kulis;David R. Hodge;Stephanie L. Ayers;Eddie F. Brown

  • Gender Segregation among College and University Employees

    Stephen Kulis

  • Promoting Reduced and Discontinued Substance Use among Adolescent Substance Users: Effectiveness of a Universal Prevention Program

    Stephen Kulis;Tanya Nieri;Scott Yabiku;Layne K. Stromwall

Frequent Co-Authors

Flavio F. Marsiglia
Flavio F. Marsiglia Arizona State University
Michael L. Hecht
Michael L. Hecht Pennsylvania State University
Felipe González Castro
Felipe González Castro Arizona State University
David R. Hodge
David R. Hodge Arizona State University
María Elena Medina-Mora
María Elena Medina-Mora National Autonomous University of Mexico

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens many career pathways, especially for those interested in counseling and therapy. Marriage and family therapy (MFT) is a prominent specialization, with distinct education and licensure requirements in different locations. For example, if you want to learn how to become a marriage and family therapist in Reno, you’ll need a master’s degree in an accredited program as well as specific supervised clinical hours.

Requirements are different in other areas. If you're exploring mft requirements in Richmond, you’ll find unique local guidelines for exams and supervised experience. Similarly, prospective therapists should research Riverside mft education requirements or Sacramento mft education requirements to understand regional differences in coursework, practicum, and licensing processes.

Online psychology programs make it more convenient to fulfill foundational degree requirements. However, clinical components usually require in-person placements. Always check state or local requirements before enrolling to ensure your degree or certification will be recognized.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen Kulis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles