World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
54439
World Ranking
6830
National Ranking
3148

Computer Science

D-Index
67
Citations
53269
World Ranking
2127
National Ranking
1071

Stephen H. Bryant publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen H. Bryant sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 147 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stephen H. Bryant D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen H. Bryant sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen H. Bryant is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within social sciences and molecular biology, with a specific focus on scientific computing, data management, and sociopolitical topics.

Their scholarly contributions include work on enzyme structure and function, protein structure and dynamics, and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms. Additionally, they have engaged in research involving research data management practices and American constitutional law and politics, reflecting a diverse range of interests.

Stephen H. Bryant's recent publication record comprises:

  • Book Review: Ian Greer and Charles Umney, Marketization: How Capitalist Exchange Disciplines Workers and Subverts Democracy (Autonomy and Automation) GreerIanUmneyCharlesMarketization: How Capitalist Exchange Disciplines Workers and Subverts Democracy (Autonomy and Automation)London; New York; Dublin: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022, £80.00 hbk, (ISBN: 9781913441456), 192 pp., 2024, Work Employment and Society
  • Adapting the open-source Gen3 platform and kubernetes for the NIH HEAL IMPOWR and MIRHIQL clinical trial data commons: Customization, cloud transition, and optimization, 2024, Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • Biological Assembly Comparison with VAST+, 2020, Methods in molecular biology
  • Personal belief versus universal truth: Religion rhetoric in death penalty policy debates in the United States, 2023, The Social Science Journal
  • Enhancing Gen3 for clinical trial time series analytics and data discovery: a data commons framework for NIH clinical trials, 2025, Frontiers in Digital Health

Frequent coauthors in their research include Meredith C B Adams, Colin Griffin, Hunter Adams, Robert W. Hurley, and Ümit Topaloğlu. This assortment of collaborators indicates interdisciplinary and collaborative approaches across biomedical informatics and social sciences.

Publication venues frequently featuring Bryant's work include Methods in molecular biology, Journal of Biomedical Informatics, The Social Science Journal, Work Employment and Society, and Frontiers in Digital Health.

Main fields of study and subfields covered in Bryant's work are:

  • Social Sciences
  • Molecular Biology
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Information Systems

Their main research topics encompass:

  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Research Data Management Practices
  • American Constitutional Law and Politics
  • Vietnamese History and Culture Studies

Best Publications

  • PubChem Substance and Compound databases

    Sunghwan Kim;Paul A. Thiessen;Evan E Bolton;Jie Chen

  • Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information

    Unknown

  • CDD: NCBI's conserved domain database

    Aron Marchler-Bauer;Myra K. Derbyshire;Noreen R. Gonzales;Shennan Lu

  • CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins

    Aron Marchler-Bauer;Shennan Lu;John B. Anderson;Farideh Chitsaz

  • CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures.

    Aron Marchler-Bauer;Yu Bo;Lianyi Han;Jane He

  • CD-Search: protein domain annotations on the fly

    Aron Marchler-Bauer;Stephen H. Bryant

  • Open mass spectrometry search algorithm.

    Lewis Y Geer;Sanford P Markey;Jeffrey A Kowalak;Lukas Wagner

  • PubChem: Integrated Platform of Small Molecules and Biological Activities

    Evan E. Bolton;Yanli Wang;Paul A. Thiessen;Stephen H. Bryant

  • PubChem: A public information system for analyzing bioactivities of small molecules

    Yanli Wang;Jewen Xiao;Tugba O. Suzek;Jian Zhang

  • Surprising similarities in structure comparison

    Jean-Francois Gibrat;Thomas Madej;Stephen H Bryant

  • CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for protein classification

    Aron Marchler-Bauer;John B. Anderson;Praveen F. Cherukuri;Carol DeWeese-Scott

  • CDD: specific functional annotation with the Conserved Domain Database.

    Aron Marchler-Bauer;John B. Anderson;Farideh Chitsaz;Myra K. Derbyshire

  • CDD: a conserved domain database for interactive domain family analysis

    Aron Marchler-Bauer;John B. Anderson;Myra K. Derbyshire;Carol DeWeese-Scott

  • The NCBI BioSystems database

    Lewis Y. Geer;Aron Marchler-Bauer;Renata C. Geer;Lianyi Han

  • CDD: conserved domains and protein three-dimensional structure

    Aron Marchler-Bauer;Chanjuan Zheng;Farideh Chitsaz;Myra K. Derbyshire

  • CDD: a curated Entrez database of conserved domain alignments

    Aron Marchler-Bauer;John B. Anderson;Carol DeWeese-Scott;Natalie D. Fedorova

  • CDART: Protein Homology by Domain Architecture

    Lewis Y. Geer;Michael Domrachev;David J. Lipman;Stephen H. Bryant

  • CDD: a database of conserved domain alignments with links to domain three-dimensional structure

    Aron Marchler-Bauer;Anna R. Panchenko;Benjamin A. Shoemaker;Paul A. Thiessen

  • PubChem's BioAssay Database

    Yanli Wang;Jewen Xiao;Tugba O. Suzek;Jian Zhang

  • Threading a database of protein cores

    Thomas Madej;Jean‐François Gibrat;Stephen H. Bryant

  • Structure-based virtual screening for drug discovery: a problem-centric review.

    Tiejun Cheng;Qingliang Li;Zhigang Zhou;Yanli Wang

  • Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information

    Unknown

  • Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Aron Marchler-Bauer
Aron Marchler-Bauer National Institutes of Health
Anna R. Panchenko
Anna R. Panchenko Queen's University
Teresa M. Przytycka
Teresa M. Przytycka National Institutes of Health
John Moult
John Moult University of Maryland, College Park
Charles E. Lawrence
Charles E. Lawrence Brown University
Helen M. Berman
Helen M. Berman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Wah Chiu
Wah Chiu Stanford University
Stephen K. Burley
Stephen K. Burley Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Michael G. Rossmann
Michael G. Rossmann Purdue University West Lafayette
David T. Jones
David T. Jones University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degree options that offer flexibility and affordability. Many students begin with online associate degree programs, which provide foundational skills in as little as six months. These programs are an excellent starting point for those looking to enter the tech sector quickly.

For those interested in business or management roles within the tech industry, you can diversify your qualifications by pursuing the cheapest online business management degree. This option allows students to combine technical and leadership skills affordably.

Many universities also offer the most affordable bachelor's degree online in computer science, enabling students to earn a reputable qualification without on-campus attendance or excessive costs.

If engineering is your passion, consider exploring an engineer degree online. These degrees are ideal for students looking to tailor their education to the modern job market and enhance career pathways in technology and innovation.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen H. Bryant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles