World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stein Ove Døskeland

Stein Ove Døskeland

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
67
Citations
13557
World Ranking
8345
National Ranking
33

Stein Ove Døskeland publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stein Ove Døskeland sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 210 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Stein Ove Døskeland D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stein Ove Døskeland sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stein Ove Døskeland is affiliated with the University of Bergen in Norway. Their research activity spans multiple fields including Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Chemistry, with substantial contributions in subfields such as Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Hematology, Nephrology, and Physiology.

Døskeland's work has prominently focused on topics related to Acute Myeloid Leukemia research, Synthesis and Biological Activity, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors research, Protein Degradation and Inhibitors, Ubiquitin and Proteasome pathways, Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes, and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin effects.

Their publication record includes articles in journals such as Cancers, Cells, RSC Medicinal Chemistry, Acta Physiologica, and Biological Chemistry. Notable recent papers include:

  • Proteome and Phosphoproteome Changes Associated with Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia, 2020, Cancers
  • The Progression of Acute Myeloid Leukemia from First Diagnosis to Chemoresistant Relapse: A Comparison of Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Profiles, 2020, Cancers
  • Epac1 Is Crucial for Maintenance of Endothelial Barrier Function through A Mechanism Partly Independent of Rac1, 2020, Cells
  • New prodrugs and analogs of the phenazine 5,10-dioxide natural products iodinin and myxin promote selective cytotoxicity towards human acute myeloid leukemia cells, 2021, RSC Medicinal Chemistry
  • Epac1 null mice have nephrogenic diabetes insipidus with deficient corticopapillary osmotic gradient and weaker collecting duct tight junctions, 2020, Acta Physiologica

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Elise Aasebø, Frode S. Berven, Randi Hovland, Øystein Bruserud, and Frode Selheim. Each has contributed jointly to multiple publications.

Best Publications

  • A novel Epac-specific cAMP analogue demonstrates independent regulation of Rap1 and ERK.

    Jorrit M. Enserink;Anne E. Christensen;Johan de Rooij;Miranda van Triest

  • Injected cytochrome c induces apoptosis

    Boris Zhivotovsky;Sten Orrenius;Odd T. Brustugun;Stein O. Døskeland

  • cAMP Analog Mapping of Epac1 and cAMP Kinase DISCRIMINATING ANALOGS DEMONSTRATE THAT Epac AND cAMP KINASE ACT SYNERGISTICALLY TO PROMOTE PC-12 CELL NEURITE EXTENSION

    Anne E. Christensen;Frode Selheim;Johan de Rooij;Sarah Dremier

  • The protein phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid induces morphological changes typical of apoptosis in mammalian cells.

    Roald Bøe;Bjørn Tore Gjertsen;Olav Karsten Vintermyr;Gunnar Houge

  • Cyclic nucleotide analogs as probes of signaling pathways.

    Heiko Poppe;Heiko Poppe;Sergei D. Rybalkin;Holger Rehmann;Thomas R. Hinds

  • Novel (Rp)-cAMPS analogs as tools for inhibition of cAMP-kinase in cell culture. Basal cAMP-kinase activity modulates interleukin-1 beta action.

    B T Gjertsen;G Mellgren;A Otten;E Maronde

  • cAMP effector mechanisms. Novel twists for an ‘old’ signaling system

    Reidun Kopperud;Camilla Krakstad;Frode Selheim;Stein Ove Døskeland

  • Probing the cyclic nucleotide binding sites of cAMP-dependent protein kinases I and II with analogs of adenosine 3',5'-cyclic phosphorothioates.

    W R Dostmann;S S Taylor;H G Genieser;B Jastorff

  • UCP1 Induction during Recruitment of Brown Adipocytes in White Adipose Tissue Is Dependent on Cyclooxygenase Activity

    Lise Madsen;Lise Madsen;Lone M. Pedersen;Haldis Haukaas Lillefosse;Haldis Haukaas Lillefosse;Even Fjære;Even Fjære

  • Cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase type I mediates the inhibitory effects of 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate on cell replication in human T lymphocytes.

    B S Skålhegg;B F Landmark;S O Døskeland;V Hansson

  • The genetic subtypes of cAMP-dependent protein kinase--functionally different or redundant?

    Stein O. Døskeland;Erik Maronde;Bjørn T. Gjertsen

  • Ligand-mediated activation of the cAMP-responsive guanine nucleotide exchange factor Epac.

    Holger Rehmann;Frank Schwede;Stein O. Døskeland;Alfred Wittinghofer

  • Cyclic AMP (cAMP)-Mediated Stimulation of Adipocyte Differentiation Requires the Synergistic Action of Epac- and cAMP-Dependent Protein Kinase-Dependent Processes

    Rasmus Koefoed Petersen;Lise Madsen;Lise Madsen;Lise Madsen;Lone Møller Pedersen;Philip Hallenborg

  • Epac1 and cAMP-dependent Protein Kinase Holoenzyme Have Similar cAMP Affinity, but Their cAMP Domains Have Distinct Structural Features and Cyclic Nucleotide Recognition

    Khanh Kim Dao;Knut Teigen;Reidun Kopperud;Erlend Hodneland

  • The 14-3-3 proteins in regulation of cellular metabolism

    Rune Kleppe;Aurora Martinez;Stein Ove Døskeland;Jan Haavik;Jan Haavik

  • Sensitive detection of apoptogenic toxins in suspension cultures of rat and salmon hepatocytes

    Kari Espolin Fladmark;Margrethe Hauge Serres;Nina Lied Larsen;Takeshi Yasumoto

  • Ultrarapid caspase-3 dependent apoptosis induction by serine/threonine phosphatase inhibitors

    K. E. Fladmark;Odd Terje Brustugun;R. Hovland;R. Bøe

  • Activation of protein kinase isozymes by cyclic nucleotide analogs used singly or in combination. Principles for optimizing the isozyme specificity of analog combinations.

    Dagfinn Øgreid;Roald Ekanger;Robert H. Suva;Jon P. Miller

  • Studies of cGMP analog specificity and function of the two intrasubunit binding sites of cGMP-dependent protein kinase.

    J D Corbin;D Ogreid;J P Miller;R H Suva

  • Comparison of the two classes of binding sites (A and B) of type I and type II cyclic-AMP-dependent protein kinases by using cyclic nucleotide analogs.

    Dagfinn Øgried;Roald Ekanger;Robert H. Suva;Jon P. Miller

Frequent Co-Authors

Bjørn Tore Gjertsen
Bjørn Tore Gjertsen Haukeland University Hospital
Lise Madsen
Lise Madsen University of Bergen
Øystein Bruserud
Øystein Bruserud University of Bergen
Torgeir Flatmark
Torgeir Flatmark University of Bergen
Kaarina Sivonen
Kaarina Sivonen University of Helsinki
Per Magne Ueland
Per Magne Ueland University of Bergen
Johannes L. Bos
Johannes L. Bos Utrecht University
Karsten Kristiansen
Karsten Kristiansen University of Copenhagen
Bernd Jastorff
Bernd Jastorff University of Bremen
Jan Haavik
Jan Haavik University of Bergen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to a range of healthcare careers. Many graduates consider pathways like medical billing and coding, which combine knowledge of science with skills in data and health information management.

One common debate is between becoming a certified professional coder versus other certifications, as each option offers different benefits and potential career outcomes. If you are curious about earning potential, resources on how much do medical coders make can give a realistic picture of salary prospects in this field.

As with any career, it's important to weigh the is medical billing and coding a good career question by considering both job satisfaction and the day-to-day work environment. For those interested in online education options that lead to these roles, exploring the him degree online can provide flexibility and affordability while gaining necessary qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing Stein Ove Døskeland

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles