World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 39 6000 5555 2161 1919 95 9505

Scott Jasechko publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott Jasechko between 2011 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott Jasechko published across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2016. 13 of the 111 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2016. 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 3 publications
2011 2025

111 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott Jasechko: publications per year, 2011 to 2025
Year Publications
2011 3
2012 2
2013 7
2014 10
2015 11
2016 13
2017 10
2018 7
2019 9
2020 7
2021 6
2022 3
2023 10
2024 10
2025 3
Total 111
Download as CSV

Scott Jasechko publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Jasechko sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 88–97 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 95 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376 95
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott Jasechko D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Jasechko sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349 39
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Hellman Fellow

Overview

Scott Jasechko is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their research focuses predominantly on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with extensive contributions to subfields including environmental engineering, geochemistry and petrology, water science and technology, ocean engineering, and global and planetary change.

The main topics of Jasechko's work span groundwater and isotope geochemistry, groundwater flow and contamination studies, hydrology and watershed management studies, groundwater and watershed analysis, hydraulic fracturing and reservoir analysis, geophysics and gravity measurements, and water resources management and optimization.

Jasechko has published a significant number of papers, with notable recent works including:

  • Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally (2024, Nature)
  • Global groundwater wells at risk of running dry (2021, Science)
  • The changing nature of groundwater in the global water cycle (2024, Science)
  • Groundwater level observations in 250,000 coastal US wells reveal scope of potential seawater intrusion (2020, Nature Communications)
  • Widespread potential loss of streamflow into underlying aquifers across the USA (2021, Nature)

Their work is published in several prominent venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Nature Communications
  • Nature
  • Science
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Jasechko often collaborates with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include Debra Perrone, Hansjörg Seybold, Ying Fan, Richard G. Taylor, and James W. Kirchner.

In 2020, Jasechko was awarded the Hellman Fellow recognition.

Best Publications

  • Terrestrial water fluxes dominated by transpiration

    Scott Jasechko;Zachary D. Sharp;John J. Gibson;S. Jean Birks

  • Transpiration in the global water cycle

    William H. Schlesinger;Scott Jasechko

  • The global volume and distribution of modern groundwater

    Tom Gleeson;Tom Gleeson;Kevin M. Befus;Scott Jasechko;Elco Luijendijk;Elco Luijendijk

  • Global separation of plant transpiration from groundwater and streamflow

    Jaivime Evaristo;Scott Jasechko;Jeffrey J. McDonnell;Jeffrey J. McDonnell;Jeffrey J. McDonnell

  • Revisiting the contribution of transpiration to global terrestrial evapotranspiration

    Zhongwang Wei;Kei Yoshimura;Lixin Wang;Diego G. Miralles;Diego G. Miralles

  • Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally

    Unknown

  • Substantial proportion of global streamflow less than three months old

    Scott Jasechko;James W. Kirchner;James W. Kirchner;Jeffrey M. Welker;Jeffrey J. McDonnell;Jeffrey J. McDonnell;Jeffrey J. McDonnell

  • The pronounced seasonality of global groundwater recharge

    Scott Jasechko;S. Jean Birks;Tom Gleeson;Yoshihide Wada

  • The changing nature of groundwater in the global water cycle

    Unknown

  • Global aquifers dominated by fossil groundwaters but wells vulnerable to modern contamination

    Scott Jasechko;Debra Perrone;Kevin M. Befus;M. Bayani Bayani Cardenas

  • Global Isotope Hydrogeology―Review

    Scott Jasechko

  • Global groundwater wells at risk of running dry.

    Scott Jasechko;Debra Perrone

  • Intensive rainfall recharges tropical groundwaters

    Scott Jasechko;Richard G Taylor

  • Groundwater level observations in 250,000 coastal US wells reveal scope of potential seawater intrusion.

    Scott Jasechko;Debra Perrone;Hansjörg Seybold;Ying Fan

  • Widespread potential loss of streamflow into underlying aquifers across the USA.

    Scott Jasechko;Hansjörg Seybold;Debra Perrone;Ying Fan

  • Risk of groundwater contamination widely underestimated because of fast flow into aquifers

    Andreas Hartmann;Andreas Hartmann;Scott Jasechko;Tom Gleeson;Yoshihide Wada;Yoshihide Wada

  • Dry groundwater wells in the western United States

    D Perrone;S Jasechko;S Jasechko

  • Isotopic evidence for widespread cold‐season‐biased groundwater recharge and young streamflow across central Canada

    Scott Jasechko;Leonard I. Wassenaar;Bernhard Mayer

  • Stable isotope mass balance of the Laurentian Great Lakes

    Scott Jasechko;John J. Gibson;Thomas W.D. Edwards

  • Deeper well drilling an unsustainable stopgap to groundwater depletion

    Debra Perrone;Scott Jasechko

  • Evidence of discharging saline formation water to the Athabasca River in the oil sands mining region, northern Alberta

    J.J. Gibson;J. Fennell;S.J. Birks;Y. Yi

  • Partitioning young and old groundwater with geochemical tracers

    Scott Jasechko

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey J. McDonnell
Jeffrey J. McDonnell University of Saskatchewan
Tom Gleeson
Tom Gleeson University of Victoria
Jeffrey M. Welker
Jeffrey M. Welker University of Oulu
Yoshihide Wada
Yoshihide Wada King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
M. Bayani Cardenas
M. Bayani Cardenas The University of Texas at Austin
Grant Ferguson
Grant Ferguson University of Saskatchewan
Diego G. Miralles
Diego G. Miralles Ghent University
John J. Gibson
John J. Gibson University of Victoria
Xuhui Lee
Xuhui Lee Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options related to Earth Science can open diverse career opportunities while offering flexibility and affordability. For those interested in visually documenting environmental changes, pursuing the cheapest online photography degree can provide essential skills in digital imaging and field photography, which are valuable for research and communication roles.

Military veterans seeking new career directions may find tailored programs especially beneficial. Online photography degrees customized for veterans offer supportive resources and flexible structures, highlighted in the online photography degree programs for veterans article, making it easier to transition into civilian careers that overlap with Earth Science fields.

Language skills also play a vital role in global earth science projects. Programs focusing on language acquisition like the cheapest online spanish degree offer affordable, accelerated options that can expand communication abilities and increase job marketability, especially for roles involving international collaboration.

Additionally, veterans interested in language studies can explore online spanish degree for military veterans programs, combining veteran-friendly support with practical language training useful in environmental consulting, research, and outreach, enhancing career pathways tied to Earth Science.

Best Scientists Citing Scott Jasechko

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles