World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
3794
World Ranking
8098
National Ranking
633

Sarah R. Pryke publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah R. Pryke sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 56 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Sarah R. Pryke D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah R. Pryke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sarah R. Pryke is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia. Their academic profile reflects engagement in research activities within their institution.

While specific information on recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields of study, subfields, and main research topics is not available, the association with a major research university suggests involvement with ongoing scientific inquiry and academic collaboration within their field.

No data on awards or distinctions received by Sarah R. Pryke is recorded. The absence of such information does not provide insight into their recognition or the impact of their scholarly contributions at this time.

Best Publications

  • Multiple receivers, multiple ornaments, and a trade-off between agonistic and epigamic signaling in a widowbird.

    Staffan Andersson;Sarah R. Pryke;Jonas Örnborg;Michael J. Lawes

  • Red dominates black: Agonistic signalling among head morphs in the colour polymorphic Gouldian finch

    Sarah R Pryke;Simon C Griffith

  • Carotenoid status signaling in captive and wild red-collared widowbirds: Independent effects of badge size and color.

    Sarah R. Pryke;Staffan Andersson;Michael J. Lawes;Steven E. Piper

  • Sexual selection of multiple handicaps in the red-collared widowbird: female choice of tail length but not carotenoid display.

    Sarah R. Pryke;Staffan Andersson;Michael J. Lawes;Michael J. Lawes

  • Agonistic carotenoid signalling in male red-collared widowbirds: aggression related to the colour signal of both the territory owner and model intruder

    Sarah R. Pryke;Michael J. Lawes;Staffan Andersson

  • PRONOUNCED WITHIN‐INDIVIDUAL PLASTICITY IN SPERM MORPHOMETRY ACROSS SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTS

    Simone Immler;Sarah R. Pryke;Tim R. Birkhead;Simon C. Griffith

  • The relative role of male vs. female mate choice in maintaining assortative pairing among discrete colour morphs

    S. R. Pryke;S. C. Griffith

  • Carotenoid-based status signalling in red-shouldered widowbirds (Euplectes axillaris): epaulet size and redness affect captive and territorial competition

    Sarah R. Pryke;Staffan Andersson

  • Genetic incompatibility drives sex allocation and maternal investment in a polymorphic finch.

    Sarah R. Pryke;Simon C. Griffith

  • Frequency-dependent physiological trade-offs between competing colour morphs

    Sarah R Pryke;Lee B Astheimer;William A Buttemer;Simon C Griffith

  • Low level of extrapair parentage in wild zebra finches

    Simon C. Griffith;Simon C. Griffith;Clare E. Holleley;Clare E. Holleley;Mylene M. Mariette;Mylene M. Mariette;Sarah R. Pryke;Sarah R. Pryke

  • Use of nest-boxes by the Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata): implications for reproductive success and research

    Simon C. Griffith;Sarah R. Pryke;Mylene Mariette

  • Carotenoid-based epaulettes reveal male competitive ability: experiments with resident and floater red-shouldered widowbirds

    Sarah R Pryke;Staffan Andersson

  • Width of grassland linkages for the conservation of butterflies in South African afforested areas

    Sarah R Pryke;Michael J Samways

  • Fiery red heads: female dominance among head color morphs in the Gouldian finch

    Unknown

  • Postzygotic genetic incompatibility between sympatric color morphs

    Sarah R. Pryke;Simon C. Griffith

  • SEX CHROMOSOME LINKAGE OF MATE PREFERENCE AND COLOR SIGNAL MAINTAINS ASSORTATIVE MATING BETWEEN INTERBREEDING FINCH MORPHS

    Unknown

  • Fiery frills: carotenoid-based coloration predicts contest success in frillneck lizards

    David G. Hamilton;Martin J. Whiting;Sarah R. Pryke

  • Females Use Multiple Mating and Genetically Loaded Sperm Competition to Target Compatible Genes

    Sarah R. Pryke;Lee A. Rollins;Simon C. Griffith

  • Constrained mate choice in social monogamy and the stress of having an unattractive partner.

    Simon C. Griffith;Sarah R. Pryke;William A. Buttemer

  • Socially mediated trade-offs between aggression and parental effort in competing color morphs.

    Sarah R. Pryke;Simon C. Griffith

  • Quality of remnant indigenous grassland linkages for adult butterflies (Lepidoptera) in an afforested African landscape

    Sarah R. Pryke;Michael J. Samways;Michael J. Samways

  • Provisioning habitat with custom-designed nest-boxes increases reproductive success in an endangered finch

    James Brazill‐Boast;Sarah R. Pryke;Simon C. Griffith

  • Behavioural differences across contexts may indicate morph-specific strategies in the lizard Ctenophorus decresii

    Madeleine St Clair Yewers;Sarah Pryke;Devi Stuart-Fox

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon C. Griffith
Simon C. Griffith Macquarie University
Patricia R. Y. Backwell
Patricia R. Y. Backwell Australian National University
Mylene M. Mariette
Mylene M. Mariette Deakin University
Devi Stuart-Fox
Devi Stuart-Fox University of Melbourne
Hanna Kokko
Hanna Kokko Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Katherine L. Buchanan
Katherine L. Buchanan Deakin University
Martin J. Whiting
Martin J. Whiting Macquarie University
J. Scott Keogh
J. Scott Keogh Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens the door to diverse career pathways, including positions in research, education, policy, and healthcare. Many professionals expand their qualifications through flexible online programs tailored to fast-track learning and career advancement.

If you are considering healthcare or nursing as a parallel or alternative path, several online programs can help you progress efficiently. Accelerated options like rn to bsn 6 months allow current Registered Nurses to advance to a Bachelor of Science in Nursing in as little as half a year. For those with an associate degree, bridging programs such as adn to np programs online offer a direct route to a Master of Science in Nursing and nurse practitioner roles.

The timeline to specialized positions varies. For example, learn how long does it take to be a nurse practitioner to better plan your career trajectory. Salaries in healthcare fields, including psychiatric nursing, depend heavily on regional factors. Explore pmhnp salary by state to compare earning potential across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah R. Pryke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles