World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ronald J. Brachman

Ronald J. Brachman

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
10450
World Ranking
13819
National Ranking
5489

Ronald J. Brachman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald J. Brachman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 75 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ronald J. Brachman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald J. Brachman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1999 - ACM Fellow For sustained and influential contributions to the field of artificial intelligence through innovative technical work, successful industrial applications, research leadership, and dedication to the community.
  • 1990 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)

Overview

Ronald J. Brachman is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and specializes in the field of computer science, with a focus on artificial intelligence. Their research contributions span various subfields including safety research and have addressed topics such as AI-based problem solving and planning, logic, reasoning and knowledge, semantic web and ontologies, as well as ethics and social impacts of AI.

The scientist's recent publications include the paper titled Toward a New Science of Common Sense, published in 2022 in the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, and an earlier version of the same work published in 2021 on arXiv (Cornell University). These papers have attracted citations reflecting their engagement in advancing common-sense reasoning within AI research.

Frequent collaborators in their work include Hector J. Levesque, with whom they have co-authored multiple papers. Additionally, their work has been published mainly in venues such as:

  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Ronald J. Brachman's contributions extend to book publications, notably through The MIT Press with the book Machines like Us, published in 2022.

The scientist's recognition in the academic community includes several fellowships:

  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2018
  • ACM Fellow, 1999, for sustained and influential contributions to the field of artificial intelligence through innovative technical work, successful industrial applications, research leadership, and dedication to the community
  • Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 1990

Best Publications

  • CLASSIC: a structural data model for objects

    Alexander Borgida;Ronald J. Brachman;Deborah L. McGuinness;Lori Alperin Resnick

  • LIVING WITH CLASSIC: When and How to Use a KL-ONE-Like Language

    Ronald J. Brachman;Deborah L. McGuinness;Peter F. Patel-Schneider;Lori Alperin Resnick

  • LaSSIE: a knowledge-based software information system

    Prem Devanbu;Ron Brachman;Peter G. Selfridge;Bruce W. Ballard

  • An Introduction to Description Logic

    Daniele Nardi;Ronald J. Brachman

  • Expressiveness and tractability in knowledge representation and reasoning

    Hector J. Levesque;Ronald J. Brachman

  • Mining business databases

    Ronald J. Brachman;Tom Khabaza;Willi Kloesgen;Gregory Piatetsky-Shapiro

  • An essential hybrid reasoning system: knowledge and symbol level accounts of KRYPTON

    Ronald J. Brachman;Victoria Pigman Gilbert;Hector J. Levesque

  • What's in a Concept: Structural Foundations for Semantic Networks

    Unknown

  • "I Lied About the Trees", Or, Defaults and Definitions in Knowledge Representation

    Unknown

  • Brief Application Description; Visual Data Mining: Recognizing Telephone Calling Fraud

    Kenneth C. Cox;Stephen G. Eick;Graham J. Wills;Ronald J. Brachman

  • Conceptual modeling with description logics

    Alex Borgida;Ronald J. Brachman

  • Loading data into description reasoners

    Alex Borgida;Ronald J. Brachman

  • Special issue on knowledge representation

    Unknown

  • Chapter 14 – Actions

    Ronald J. Brachman;Hector J. Levesque

  • “Reducing” CLASSIC to practice: knowledge representation theory meets reality

    Ronald J. Brachman;Deborah L. McGuinness;Peter F. Patel-Schneider;Alex Borgida

  • The Language of First-Order Logic

    Ronald J. Brachman;Hector J. Levesque

  • Research in Natural Language Understanding

    Unknown

  • Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning

    James Allen;Ronald J. Brachman;Erik Sandewall;Hector J. Levesque

  • Knowledge representation

    Ronald J. Brachman;Hector J. Levesque;Raymond Reiter

  • What makes a knowledge base knowledgeable? A view of databases from the knowledge level

    R J Brachman;H J Levesque

  • Knowledge representation, connectionism and conceptual retrieval

    R. J. Brachman;D. L. McGuinness

  • Knowledge level interfaces to information systems

    Hector Levesque;Ronald Brachman

  • The knowledge level of KBMS

    Ronald Brachman;Hector Levesque

  • Nonmonotonic reasoning in the framework of situation calculus

    Ronald J. Brachman;Hector J. Levesque;Raymond Reiter

Frequent Co-Authors

Hector J. Levesque
Hector J. Levesque University of Toronto
Alexander Borgida
Alexander Borgida Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Sihem Amer-Yahia
Sihem Amer-Yahia Grenoble Alpes University
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Peter F. Patel-Schneider Palo Alto Research Center
Deborah L. McGuinness
Deborah L. McGuinness Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Daniele Nardi
Daniele Nardi Sapienza University of Rome

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to diverse and promising career options. Many students also explore related fields and interdisciplinary programs to enhance their skillsets. Online education has made it easier to pursue these alternatives, often at a lower cost and with flexible schedules.

For those interested in sustainability and technology, an environmental engineering online degree combines computer science fundamentals with environmental problem-solving. Similarly, an online degree for mechanical engineering may benefit students drawn to robotics, manufacturing, or hardware design.

If you have a strong foundation in mathematics and enjoy analytical thinking, an online physics degree can be a solid pathway, connecting computational skills with scientific inquiry. Increasingly, many computer science graduates pursue data science careers; if affordability is a concern, you may want to explore what is the cheapest data science course in the us? to find budget-friendly online options.

Choosing the right online degree program can broaden your career horizons and help you specialize in emerging industries related to computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald J. Brachman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles