World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Roger K. Blashfield

Roger K. Blashfield

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
12004
World Ranking
7404
National Ranking
4001

Roger K. Blashfield publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger K. Blashfield sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 137 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Roger K. Blashfield D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger K. Blashfield sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roger K. Blashfield is affiliated with Auburn University in the United States. The academic profile available does not include specific details on published papers, coauthors, or frequent publication venues related to their work.

No information is provided regarding the main fields of study, subfields, or main topics that Roger K. Blashfield has focused on during their career. Similarly, there is no record of book publications or awards attributed to this researcher based on the current data.

Without detailed information on their publication record or research topics, it is not possible to specify particular areas of scientific contribution or thematic focus. The absence of publicly available recent papers or collaborative networks suggests either a specialized niche or limited online documentation at this time.

As a faculty member at Auburn University, Roger K. Blashfield is positioned within an academic environment that supports research and education. Further details about their scholarly interests or research output would require additional sources or institutional information not included here.

Best Publications

  • Cluster Analysis. Sage University Paper Series On Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 07-044

    Mark S. Aldenderfer;Roger K. Blashfield

  • Mixture model tests of cluster analysis: Accuracy of four agglomerative hierarchical methods.

    Roger K. Blashfield

  • MMPI scales for DSM-III personality disorders: their derivation and correlates.

    Leslie C. Morey;Mark H. Waugh;Roger K. Blashfield

  • The Methods and Problems of Cluster Analysis

    Roger K. Blashfield;Mark S. Aldenderfer

  • Performance of a composite as a function of the number of judges

    Robert Libby;Roger K. Blashfield

  • The rationale for the reclassification of personality disorder in the 11th revision of the international classification of diseases (ICD‐11).

    Peter Tyrer;Mike Crawford;Roger Mulder;Roger Blashfield

  • A Comparison of Cluster Analysis Techniques Withing a Sequential Validation Framework

    Leslie C. Morey;Roger K. Blashfield;Harvey A. Skinner

  • A Nearest-Centroid Technique for Evaluating the Minimum-Variance Clustering Procedure.

    Robert M. McIntyre;Roger K. Blashfield

  • The Literature On Cluster Analysis.

    Roger K. Blashfield;Mark S. Aldenderfer

  • The Classification of Psychopathology

    Roger K. Blashfield

  • The Cycle of Classification: DSM-I Through DSM-5

    Roger K. Blashfield;Jared W. Keeley;Elizabeth H. Flanagan;Shannon R. Miles

  • Neuropsychology and cluster analysis: potentials and problems.

    Robin Morris;Roger K.. Blashfield;Paul Satz

  • Propositions regarding the use of cluster analysis in clinical research.

    Roger K. Blashfield

  • Growth of the literature on the topic of personality disorders.

    Roger K. Blashfield;Vincent Intoccia

  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)

    Jared W. Keeley;Danny R. Burgess;Roger K. Blashfield

  • Psychotropic medication and priapism: a comprehensive review.

    Thompson Jw;Ware Mr;Blashfield Rk

  • Evaluative criteria for psychiatric classification.

    Roger K. Blashfield;Juris G. Draguns

  • The Classification of Psychopathology: Neo-Kraepelinian and Quantitative Approaches

    Unknown

  • Empirical classifications of alcoholism: a review.

    L C Morey;R K Blashfield

  • Feighner et al., Invisible Colleges, and the Matthew Effect

    Roger K. Blashfield

  • An exploratory examination of student attitudes toward impaired peers in clinical psychology training programs

    Matthew N. I. Oliver;Jessey H. Bernstein;Kristen G. Anderson;Roger K. Blashfield

Frequent Co-Authors

Leslie C. Morey
Leslie C. Morey Texas A&M University
Bruce Pfohl
Bruce Pfohl University of Iowa
Harvey A. Skinner
Harvey A. Skinner York University
Robin G. Morris
Robin G. Morris King's College London
Peter Tyrer
Peter Tyrer Imperial College London
Peter Muris
Peter Muris Maastricht University
Andrea Fossati
Andrea Fossati Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Lee Anna Clark
Lee Anna Clark University of Notre Dame
Mike J. Crawford
Mike J. Crawford Imperial College London
Geoffrey M. Reed
Geoffrey M. Reed Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up various career paths, especially in social work and related fields. Many students consider online degrees for their flexibility and accessibility, allowing them to balance study with other commitments.

If you are interested in becoming a social worker, it’s important to know that qualification requirements vary by state. For instance, the degree needed to be a social worker in Maine typically includes a bachelor’s or master’s in social work with specific coursework and supervised experience.

Similarly, you should be aware of the social worker degree requirements in Maryland, which often demand advanced degrees and state-specific licensing exams. The Massachusetts education requirements for social workers and social worker education requirements in Michigan outline similar necessities, emphasizing accredited degrees and fieldwork.

Understanding these pathways can help you choose the right online degree and plan your next step toward a meaningful career in social work or psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Roger K. Blashfield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles