World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4059
World Ranking
10943
National Ranking
759

Robert Loo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Loo sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 99 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert Loo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Loo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Loo is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada. Their research and academic activities are centered around this institution, contributing to its scientific community.

While there is no specific information available on recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or specific fields and subfields of study related to Robert Loo, the association with a prominent university indicates engagement with academic research and higher education.

No records of book publications or awards are listed for Robert Loo, which suggests that their professional contributions may primarily involve other forms of scholarly output or academic involvement.

Due to limited publicly available data, detailed insights into their scientific interests, research topics, and the impact or scope of their work remain unspecified.

Best Publications

  • A caveat on using single‐item versus multiple‐item scales

    Robert Loo

  • Confirmatory factor analyses of the full and short versions of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale.

    Robert Loo;Karran Thorpe

  • A psychometric evaluation of the General Decision-Making Style Inventory

    Robert Loo

  • A Meta-Analytic Examination of Kolb's Learning Style Preferences Among Business Majors

    Robert Loo

  • Kolb’s learning styles and learning preferences: Is there a linkage?

    Robert Loo

  • Confirmatory Factor Analyses of Scores From Full and Short Versions of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale

    Robert Loo;Pamela Loewen

  • Role of primary personality factors in the perception of traffic signs and driver violations and accidents

    Robert Loo

  • Are women more ethical than men? Findings from three independent studies

    Robert Loo

  • Using reflective learning journals to improve individual and team performance

    Robert Loo;Karran Thorpe

  • Balancing professional and personal satisfaction of nurse managers: current and future perspectives in a changing health care system.

    Karran Thorpe;Robert Loo

  • A Meta‐Analysis of Police Suicide Rates: Findings and Issues

    Robert Loo

  • Confirmatory factor analyses of Kolb's Learning Style Inventory (LSI-1985)

    Robert Loo

  • Assessing “team climate” in project teams

    Robert Loo

  • Attitudes Toward Women's Roles in Society: A Replication After 20 Years

    Robert Loo;Karran Thorpe

  • Motivational Orientations Toward Work: An Evaluation of the Work Preference Inventory (Student Form)

    Robert Loo

  • The distribution of learning styles and types for hard and soft business majors

    Robert Loo

  • A typology of burnout types among police managers

    Robert Loo

  • Individual Differences and the Perception of Traffic Signs

    Robert Loo

  • The values profile of nursing undergraduate students: implications for education and professional development.

    Karran Thorpe;Robert Loo

  • Personality correlates of the Fear of Death and Dying Scale.

    Robert Loo

  • A Confirmatory Factor-Analytic and Psychometric Examination of the Team Climate Inventory Full and Short Versions

    Robert Loo;Pamela Loewen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online Psychology degree in the USA can open doors to a variety of career pathways—including becoming a licensed therapist. Each state has its own education requirements, licensure steps, and practical training demands. For example, becoming a licensed therapist in Seattle requires a specific combination of accredited coursework, supervised hours, and passing examinations.

If you are interested in how to become a licensed therapist in Spokane, you’ll notice that while the process is similar, there can be differences in required internships or continuing education units. Likewise, becoming a licensed therapist in St. Louis may have different local guidelines and state board standards to meet.

Florida also has unique standards; for those seeking St. Petersburg licensed therapist education requirements, understanding the state's process is critical. Exploring these pathways will help you select the right online degree, ensuring your education aligns with your career goals and local licensure requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Loo

Recently Published Articles