World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
16842
World Ranking
6577
National Ranking
513

Robert Clement publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Clement sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 72 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Robert Clement D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Clement sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Clement is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science, with particular contributions to several subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology, Environmental Engineering, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Plant Science.

The scientist's work addresses a variety of topics, with notable emphasis on Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Climate Variability and Models, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Soil Geostatistics and Mapping, Forest Ecology and Management, and Plant Responses to Elevated CO2.

Their recent scholarly output includes papers published between 2021 and 2024 across several journals. Notable papers include:

  • Stable gap-filling for longer eddy covariance data gaps: A globally validated machine-learning approach for carbon dioxide, water, and energy fluxes, 2021, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Challenges in Scaling Up Greenhouse Gas Fluxes: Experience From the UK Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Feedbacks Program, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • Strong Correspondence in Evapotranspiration and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes Between Different Eddy Covariance Systems Enables Quantification of Landscape Heterogeneity in Dryland Fluxes, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • Lower-cost eddy covariance for CO 2 and H 2 O fluxes over grassland and agroforestry, 2024, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
  • Evaluating Micro-Topographic Controls on Forest Soil Ch4, N2o and Co2 Fluxes, 2024, SSRN Electronic Journal

Robert Clement collaborates regularly with other researchers, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Timothy C. Hill
  • Songyan Zhu (2 collaborations)
  • Jon McCalmont (1 collaboration)
  • Christian A. Davies (1 collaboration)
  • Peter Levy (1 collaboration)

Their publications are frequently found in the following venues:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences (2 papers)
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (1 paper)
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (1 paper)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (1 paper)

Best Publications

  • Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology

    Marc Aubinet;Achim Grelle;Andreas Ibrom;Üllar Rannik

  • Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange

    E. Falge;D. Baldocchi;R. Olson;P. Anthoni

  • Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests

    R. Valentini;G. Matteucci;A. J. Dolman;E.-D. Schulze

  • Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests

    I. A. Janssens;H. Lankreijer;G. Matteucci;A. S. Kowalski

  • Seasonality of ecosystem respiration and gross primary production as derived from FLUXNET measurements

    Eva Falge;Dennis Baldocchi;John Tenhunen;Marc Aubinet

  • A re-evaluation of long-term flux measurement techniques - Part I: Averaging and coordinate rotation

    J. J. Finnigan;Robert Clement;Y. Malhi;R. Leuning

  • Gap filling strategies for long term energy flux data sets

    Eva Falge;Dennis D. Baldocchi;Richard Olson;Peter Anthoni

  • Averaging, Detrending, and Filtering of Eddy Covariance Time Series

    John Moncrieff;Robert Clement;John Finnigan;Tilden Meyers

  • Seasonality in CO2 and H2O flux at an eastern Amazonian rain forest

    F. E. Carswell;F. E. Carswell;A. L. Costa;M. Palheta;M. Palheta;Y. Malhi

  • Eddy fluxes of CO2, water vapor, and sensible heat over a deciduous forest

    Shashi B. Verma;Shashi B. Verma;Dennis D. Baldocchi;Dennis D. Baldocchi;Dean E. Anderson;Dean E. Anderson;Detlef R. Matt;Detlef R. Matt

  • Energy and water dynamics of a central Amazonian rain forest

    Y. Malhi;E. Pegoraro;A. D. Nobre;M. G. P. Pereira

  • Quality control of CarboEurope flux data – Part 2: Inter-comparison of eddy-covariance software

    Matthias Mauder;Matthias Mauder;Thomas Foken;Robert Clement;Jan A. Elbers

  • Quality control of CarboEurope flux data. Part 1: Coupling footprint analyses with flux data quality assessment to evaluate sites in forest ecosystems

    Mathias Göckede;Mathias Göckede;Thomas Foken;Marc Aubinet;Mika Aurela

  • Quality analysis applied on eddy covariance measurements at complex forest sites using footprint modelling

    Corinna Rebmann;Mathias Göckede;Thomas Foken;Marc Aubinet

  • How do leaf and ecosystem measures of water-use efficiency compare?

    Belinda E. Medlyn;Martin G. De Kauwe;Yan Shih Lin;Yan Shih Lin;Jurgen Knauer;Jurgen Knauer

  • Climate control of terrestrial carbon exchange across biomes and continents

    Chuixiang Yi;Daniel Ricciuto;Runze Li;John Wolbeck

  • On the validation of models of forest CO2 exchange using eddy covariance data: some perils and pitfalls.

    Belinda E. Medlyn;Andrew P. Robinson;Robert Clement;Ross E. McMurtrie

  • Phase and amplitude of ecosystem carbon release and uptake potentials as derived from FLUXNET measurements

    Eva Falge;John Tenhunen;Dennis Baldocchi;Marc Aubinet

  • Momentum, water vapor, and carbon dioxide exchange at a centrally located prairie site during FIFE

    Shashi B. Verma;Joon Kim;Robert J. Clement

  • ICOS eddy covariance flux-station site setup: a review

    Corinna Rebmann;Marc Aubinet;Hape Schmid;Nicola Arriga

  • Seasonality in CO2 and H2O flux at an eastern Amazonian rain forest : Large-scale biosphere-atmosphere experiment in Amazonia (LBA)

    F. E. Carswell;A. L. Costa;M. Palheta;Y. Malhi

Frequent Co-Authors

Corinna Rebmann
Corinna Rebmann Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
John Moncrieff
John Moncrieff University of Edinburgh
Marc Aubinet
Marc Aubinet University of Liège
Kim Pilegaard
Kim Pilegaard Technical University of Denmark
Shashi B. Verma
Shashi B. Verma University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Andrew S. Kowalski
Andrew S. Kowalski University of Granada
Eddy Moors
Eddy Moors Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Timo Vesala
Timo Vesala University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Environmental Sciences often involves interdisciplinary knowledge and advanced education. For professionals looking to expand their expertise, various online programs provide flexible and viable options. Doctoral programs online no dissertation offer an alternative route for those seeking advanced credentials without the extensive research thesis, making it easier to progress without interrupting a busy schedule.

Many students consider the best eds to edd programs to elevate their educational leadership skills, which can be beneficial for environmental policy development and academic roles. These streamlined paths help students move from a master's level to a doctoral degree efficiently, equipping them with leadership and research skills applicable in environmental fields.

For those interested in social aspects of Environmental Sciences, affordable online doctorate in social work programs provide opportunities to specialize in community health and environmental justice, addressing the impact of environmental changes on vulnerable populations. Budget-conscious learners can also explore affordable online general studies degree programs that offer a broad foundation in various disciplines, including environmental topics, enabling a well-rounded approach to sustainability and ecological challenges.

By leveraging these diverse online options, students and professionals can tailor their education to support a variety of career pathways within Environmental Sciences, from policy and advocacy to research and community development.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Clement

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles