World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Microbiology

D-Index
46
Citations
11782
World Ranking
4853
National Ranking
1874

Robert B. Nadelman publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert B. Nadelman sits on this spectrum.

55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 264 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 233 scientists 205–214 publications: 207 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55 publications 679+

This scientist: 99 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

Robert B. Nadelman D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert B. Nadelman sits on this spectrum.

40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 111 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 122 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 93 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert B. Nadelman was affiliated with New York Medical College in the United States. Their research contributions spanned multiple areas within medicine, with a primary focus on dermatological diseases and infestations, urticaria and related conditions, and vector-borne infectious diseases.

The main fields of study in their work included Medicine and Immunology and Microbiology. Within these broader fields, their research covered several important subfields such as Infectious Diseases, Rheumatology, and Parasitology.

The scientist's work addressed various topics across these domains, specifically concentrating on:

  • Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Urticaria and Related Conditions
  • Vector-borne infectious diseases

Among frequent collaborators, Tao Lin was notable, having co-authored with Robert B. Nadelman on at least one occasion.

Best Publications

  • The Clinical Assessment, Treatment, and Prevention of Lyme Disease, Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis, and Babesiosis: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America

    Gary P. Wormser;Raymond J. Dattwyler;Eugene D. Shapiro;John J. Halperin

  • Diagnosis and Management of Tickborne Rickettsial Diseases: Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever and Other Spotted Fever Group Rickettsioses, Ehrlichioses, and Anaplasmosis - United States.

    Holly M. Biggs;Casey Barton Behravesh;Kristy K. Bradley;F. Scott Dahlgren

  • Prophylaxis with Single-Dose Doxycycline for the Prevention of Lyme Disease after an Ixodes scapularis Tick Bite

    Robert B. Nadelman;John Nowakowski;Durland Fish;Richard C. Falco

  • Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Lyme Disease

    Gary P. Wormser;Robert B. Nadelman;Raymond J. Dattwyler;David T. Dennis

  • Erratum: The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (Clinical Infectious Diseases (2006) 43, (1089-1134))

    G. P. Wormser;R. J. Dattwyler;E. D. Shapiro;John Halperin

  • Evolution of the serologic response to Borrelia burgdorferi in treated patients with culture-confirmed erythema migrans.

    M E Aguero-Rosenfeld;J Nowakowski;S Bittker;D Cooper

  • Duration of Antibiotic Therapy for Early Lyme Disease: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

    Gary P. Wormser;Roshan Ramanathan;John Nowakowski;Donna McKenna

  • The clinical spectrum of early lyme borreliosis in patients with culture-confirmed erythema migrans

    Robert B. Nadelman;John Nowakowski;Gilda Forseter;Neil S. Goldberg

  • Simultaneous Human Granulocytic Ehrlichiosis and Lyme Borreliosis

    Robert B. Nadelman;Harold W. Horowitz;Tze-chen Hsieh;Joseph M. Wu

  • Borrelia burgdorferi genotype predicts the capacity for hematogenous dissemination during early Lyme disease.

    Gary P. Wormser;Dustin Brisson;Dionysios Liveris;Klára Hanincová

  • Association of Specific Subtypes of Borrelia burgdorferi with Hematogenous Dissemination in Early Lyme Disease

    G P Wormser;D Liveris;J Nowakowski;R B Nadelman

  • Comparison of cefuroxime axetil and doxycycline in the treatment of early Lyme disease.

    Robert B. Nadelman;Steven W. Luger;Elliot Frank;Michael Wisniewski

  • Comparison of Culture-Confirmed Erythema Migrans Caused by Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto in New York State and by Borrelia afzelii in Slovenia

    Franc Strle;Robert B. Nadelman;Joze Cimperman;John Nowakowski

  • Temporal Relation between Ixodes scapularis Abundance and Risk for Lyme Disease Associated with Erythema Migrans

    Richard C. Falco;Donna F. McKenna;Thomas J. Daniels;Robert B. Nadelman

  • Genetic Diversity of Borrelia burgdorferi in Lyme Disease Patients as Determined by Culture versus Direct PCR with Clinical Specimens

    Dionysios Liveris;Shobha Varde;Radha Iyer;Seth Koenig

  • Single-tier testing with the C6 peptide ELISA kit compared with two-tier testing for Lyme disease

    Gary P. Wormser;Martin Schriefer;Maria E. Aguero-Rosenfeld;Andrew Levin

  • Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques for Patients with Early Lyme Disease Associated with Erythema Migrans: A Comparison of Different Techniques

    John Nowakowski;Ira Schwartz;Dionysios Liveris;Guiqing Wang

  • Isolation of Borrelia burgdorferi from the blood of seven patients with Lyme disease.

    Robert B. Nadelman;Charles S. Pavia;Louis A. Magnarelli;Gary P. Wormser

  • Long-term follow-up of patients with culture-confirmed Lyme disease.

    John Nowakowski;Robert B Nadelman;Rebecca Sell;Donna McKenna

  • Brief Communication: Hematogenous Dissemination in Early Lyme Disease

    Gary P Wormser;Donna McKenna;Jennafer Carlin;Robert B Nadelman

  • Differentiation of reinfection from relapse in recurrent Lyme disease.

    Robert B. Nadelman;Klára Hanincová;Priyanka Mukherjee;Dionysios Liveris

  • Lyme borreliosis

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary P. Wormser
Gary P. Wormser New York Medical College
John Nowakowski
John Nowakowski New York Medical College
Ira Schwartz
Ira Schwartz New York Medical College
Allen C. Steere
Allen C. Steere Harvard University
J. Stephen Dumler
J. Stephen Dumler Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Franc Strle
Franc Strle University of Ljubljana
Durland Fish
Durland Fish Yale University
Justin D. Radolf
Justin D. Radolf University of Connecticut Health Center
Mark S. Klempner
Mark S. Klempner University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Joseph M. Wu
Joseph M. Wu New York Medical College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond traditional microbiology, several online degree options provide complementary skills relevant to healthcare and life sciences. Pursuing an accredited online health information management degree cahiim can open doors to managing patient data and healthcare systems, a crucial aspect of modern medical research and public health.

Additionally, certificate programs like the fastest online medical billing and coding certificate programs offer practical skills that can be completed quickly. These can serve as a valuable stepping stone into healthcare administration or insurance-related roles.

For those seeking a broader healthcare education, numerous online healthcare programs provide flexibility and accessibility for in-demand medical careers. Many of these programs cater to working professionals aiming to advance their qualifications without relocating.

Students interested in public health might consider some of the easy mph online programs to get into. These programs focus on population health and epidemiology, complementing microbiology knowledge and enabling graduates to take on roles in disease prevention and health policy.

Best Scientists Citing Robert B. Nadelman

Recently Published Articles