World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Microbiology

D-Index
41
Citations
5635
World Ranking
5465
National Ranking
2064

Martin E. Schriefer publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin E. Schriefer sits on this spectrum.

55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55 publications 679+

This scientist: 88 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

Martin E. Schriefer D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin E. Schriefer sits on this spectrum.

40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin E. Schriefer is affiliated with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States. Their research primarily covers several interconnected fields related to infectious diseases and public health.

The main fields of study in which Martin E. Schriefer has contributed include:

  • Medicine
  • Immunology and Microbiology

Their work also extends into specific subfields, including:

  • Parasitology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Martin E. Schriefer's research focuses on topics related to vector-borne diseases and the role of viral infections and vectors, with an emphasis on mosquito-borne diseases and control. The main topics of their work are:

  • Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Viral Infections and Vectors
  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control

Among their recent publications, Martin E. Schriefer has contributed to the paper titled "Isolation of Borrelia miyamotoi and other Borreliae using a modified BSK medium", published in Scientific Reports in 2021. This paper has been cited by other researchers multiple times, reflecting engagement within the scientific community.

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Martin E. Schriefer include:

  • Adam J. Replogle
  • Christopher Sexton
  • John W. Young
  • Luke C. Kingry
  • Marc C. Dolan

Most of Martin E. Schriefer's publications appear in the journal Scientific Reports, where they have contributed at least one research article. This venue reflects the dissemination channel for their findings in the broader scientific milieu.

Best Publications

  • Identification of a novel pathogenic Borrelia species causing Lyme borreliosis with unusually high spirochaetaemia: a descriptive study

    Bobbi S Pritt;Paul S Mead;Diep K Hoang Johnson;David F Neitzel

  • Serodiagnosis of Lyme Disease by Kinetic Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Using Recombinant VlsE1 or Peptide Antigens of Borrelia burgdorferi Compared with 2-Tiered Testing Using Whole-Cell Lysates

    Rendi Murphree Bacon;Brad J. Biggerstaff;Martin E. Schriefer;Robert D. Gilmore

  • An outbreak of primary pneumonic tularemia on Martha's Vineyard.

    Katherine A. Feldman;Russell E. Enscore;Sarah L. Lathrop;Bela T. Matyas

  • Four Clones of Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Stricto Cause Invasive Infection in Humans

    Gerald Seinost;Daniel E. Dykhuizen;Raymond J. Dattwyler;William T. Golde

  • Francisella tularensis: an arthropod-borne pathogen

    Jeannine M Petersen;Paul S Mead;Martin E Schriefer

  • Tularemia: emergence/re-emergence

    Jeannine M. Petersen;Martin E. Schriefer

  • Current Guidelines, Common Clinical Pitfalls, and Future Directions for Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Disease, United States

    Andrew Moore;Christina Nelson;Claudia Molins;Paul Mead

  • Borrelia mayonii sp. nov., a member of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex, detected in patients and ticks in the upper midwestern United States.

    Bobbi S. Pritt;Laurel B. Respicio-Kingry;Lynne M. Sloan;Martin E. Schriefer

  • Single-tier testing with the C6 peptide ELISA kit compared with two-tier testing for Lyme disease

    Gary P. Wormser;Martin Schriefer;Maria E. Aguero-Rosenfeld;Andrew Levin

  • Persistence of Yersinia pestis in Soil Under Natural Conditions

    Rebecca J. Eisen;Jeannine M. Petersen;Charles L. Higgins;David Wong

  • Erythema Migrans—like Rash Illness at a Camp in North Carolina: A New Tick-Borne Disease?

    K B Kirkland;T B Klimko;R A Meriwether;M Schriefer

  • Epidemiologic and Diagnostic Studies of Patients with Suspected Early Lyme Disease, Missouri, 1990–1993

    Grant L. Campbell;William S. Paul;Martin E. Schriefer;Robert B. Craven

  • Clinical and Epidemiological Features of Early Lyme Disease and Human Granulocytic Ehrlichiosis in Wisconsin

    Edward A. Belongia;Kurt D. Reed;Paul D. Mitchell;Po-Huang Chyou

  • Detection of Rickettsia, Borrelia, and Bartonella in Carios kelleyi (Acari: Argasidae)

    Amanda D. Loftis;James S. Gill;Martin E. Schriefer;Michael L. Levin

  • Emergence of Lyme Disease in Hunterdon County, New Jersey, 1993: A Case-Control Study of Risk Factors and Evaluation of Reporting Patterns

    Kathleen A. Orioski;Grant L. Campbell;Carol A. Genese;John W. Beckley

  • Murine typhus: updated roles of multiple urban components and a second typhuslike rickettsia.

    Martin E. Schriefer;John B. Sacci;Jeffrey P. Taylor;James A. Higgins

  • Advances in Serodiagnostic Testing for Lyme Disease Are at Hand

    John A Branda;Barbara A Body;Jeff Boyle;Bernard M Branson

  • Wide Distribution of a High-Virulence Borrelia burgdorferi Clone in Europe and North America

    Wei-Gang Qiu;John F. Bruno;William D. McCaig;Yun Xu

  • Primary pneumonic plague contracted from a mountain lion carcass.

    David Wong;Margaret A. Wild;Matthew A. Walburger;Charles L. Higgins

  • Collection and Characterization of Samples for Establishment of a Serum Repository for Lyme Disease Diagnostic Test Development and Evaluation

    Claudia R. Molins;Christopher Sexton;John W. Young;Laura V. Ashton

  • Serodiagnosis of Louse-Borne relapsing fever with glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase (GlpQ) from Borrelia recurrentis.

    Stephen F. Porcella;Sandra J. Raffel;Merry E. Schrumpf;Martin E. Schriefer

  • Pneumonic plague cluster, Uganda, 2004.

    Elizabeth M. Begier;Gershim Asiki;Zaccheus Anywaine;Brook Yockey

  • Serodiagnosis of syphilis: antibodies to recombinant Tp0453, Tp92, and Gpd proteins are sensitive and specific indicators of infection by Treponema pallidum.

    Wesley C. Van Voorhis;Lynn K. Barrett;Sheila A. Lukehart;Bruno Schmidt

  • Cardiac Tropism of Borrelia burgdorferi: An Autopsy Study of Sudden Cardiac Death Associated with Lyme Carditis

    Atis Muehlenbachs;Brigid C. Bollweg;Thadeus J. Schulz;Joseph D. Forrester

  • Development of a Metabolic Biosignature for Detection of Early Lyme Disease

    Claudia R. Molins;Laura V. Ashton;Gary P. Wormser;Ann M. Hess

  • A multiplex serologic platform for diagnosis of tick-borne diseases.

    Rafal Tokarz;Nischay Mishra;Teresa Tagliafierro;Stephen Sameroff

  • Evaluation of Modified Two-Tiered Testing Algorithms for Lyme Disease Laboratory Diagnosis Using Well-Characterized Serum Samples.

    Adoracion Pegalajar-Jurado;Martin E. Schriefer;Ryan J. Welch;Marc R. Couturier;Marc R. Couturier

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul S. Mead
Paul S. Mead Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Kenneth L. Gage
Kenneth L. Gage Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Rebecca J. Eisen
Rebecca J. Eisen Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Marc C. Dolan
Marc C. Dolan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Gary P. Wormser
Gary P. Wormser New York Medical College
Adriana Marques
Adriana Marques National Institutes of Health
Grant L. Campbell
Grant L. Campbell Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Charles B. Beard
Charles B. Beard Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
John A. Montenieri
John A. Montenieri Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Joseph Piesman
Joseph Piesman Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology opens doors to various health and science-related careers. Many students explore complementary fields like health information management, which combines healthcare knowledge with data management skills. For those interested, pursuing a online cahiim accredited health information management degree ensures recognized credentials that can boost career prospects.

Health information managers enjoy competitive salaries and diverse job opportunities. Understanding the health information management degree salary can help prospective students assess the financial benefits of this career path.

For those seeking quicker entry into the healthcare admin field, an accelerated medical billing and coding certificate online offers a practical route to specialized roles. This option is ideal for professionals wanting to complement a microbiology background with healthcare administrative skills.

Additionally, many students interested in medical careers may explore medical degrees online to advance their qualifications with flexible learning options. Together, these pathways can enhance career versatility and growth in health sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Martin E. Schriefer

Trending Scientists