World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Geert De Jaeger

Geert De Jaeger

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 68 1522 1365 19 18 195 15501

Geert De Jaeger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Geert De Jaeger between 1961 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Geert De Jaeger published across 65 years, from 1961 to 2025, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2022. 15 of the 246 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1961 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2022. 1961: 1 publication 1962: 1 publication 1963: 2 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 5 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 3 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 3 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 7 publications
1961 2025

246 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Geert De Jaeger: publications per year, 1961 to 2025
Year Publications
1961 1
1962 1
1963 2
1964 0
1965 1
1966 5
1967 1
1968 0
1969 3
1970 1
1971 1
1972 3
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 2
1978 2
1979 2
1980 1
1981 2
1982 0
1983 1
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 2
1997 3
1998 2
1999 3
2000 8
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 3
2005 3
2006 0
2007 4
2008 2
2009 7
2010 5
2011 8
2012 5
2013 12
2014 10
2015 8
2016 11
2017 9
2018 11
2019 11
2020 15
2021 14
2022 22
2023 13
2024 8
2025 7
Total 246
Download as CSV

Geert De Jaeger publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geert De Jaeger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 187–196 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 195 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112 195
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Geert De Jaeger D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geert De Jaeger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97 68
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Geert De Jaeger is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and has an extensive publication record primarily in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions to Agricultural and Biological Sciences. The scientist's work spans multiple subfields including Molecular Biology, Plant Science, and Cell Biology.

Key research topics addressed in the body of work include:

  • Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Cellular transport and secretion
  • Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
  • Plant Reproductive Biology
  • Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance

The recent notable papers authored by Geert De Jaeger are:

  • Establishment of Proximity-Dependent Biotinylation Approaches in Different Plant Model Systems (2020, The Plant Cell)
  • Mapping of the plant SnRK1 kinase signalling network reveals a key regulatory role for the class II T6P synthase-like proteins (2022, Nature Plants)
  • KIN10 promotes stomatal development through stabilization of the SPEECHLESS transcription factor (2020, Nature Communications)
  • NuA4 and H2A.Z control environmental responses and autotrophic growth in Arabidopsis (2022, Nature Communications)
  • The membrane-localized protein kinase MAP4K4/TOT3 regulates thermomorphogenesis (2021, Nature Communications)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Geert De Jaeger include:

  • Dominique Eeckhout
  • Daniël Van Damme
  • Jelle Van Leene
  • Evelien Mylle
  • Nancy De Winne

Publication venues where the scientist has contributed multiple works encompass:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Plant Cell
  • Nature Communications
  • Nature Plants
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

Best Publications

  • The Arabidopsis bHLH Transcription Factors MYC3 and MYC4 Are Targets of JAZ Repressors and Act Additively with MYC2 in the Activation of Jasmonate Responses

    Patricia Fernández-Calvo;Andrea Chini;Gemma Fernández-Barbero;José-Manuel Chico

  • NINJA connects the co-repressor TOPLESS to jasmonate signalling

    Laurens Pauwels;Gemma Fernández Barbero;Jan Geerinck;Jan Geerinck;Sofie Tilleman;Sofie Tilleman

  • Identification of factors required for m6A mRNA methylation in Arabidopsis reveals a role for the conserved E3 ubiquitin ligase HAKAI

    Kamil Růžička;Kamil Růžička;Mi Zhang;Ana Campilho;Ana Campilho;Zsuzsanna Bodi

  • Type II Metacaspases Atmc4 and Atmc9 of Arabidopsis thaliana Cleave Substrates after Arginine and Lysine

    Dominique Vercammen;Brigitte van de Cotte;Geert De Jaeger;Dominique Eeckhout

  • Targeted interactomics reveals a complex core cell cycle machinery in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Jelle Van Leene;Jens Hollunder;Dominique Eeckhout;Geert Persiau

  • ERF115 Controls Root Quiescent Center Cell Division and Stem Cell Replenishment

    Jefri Heyman;Toon Cools;Filip Vandenbussche;Ken S. Heyndrickx

  • PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE1-LIKE8 plays an important role for the regulation of abscisic acid signaling in root

    Regina Antoni;Miguel Gonzalez-Guzman;Lesia Rodriguez;Marta Peirats-Llobet

  • The TPLATE Adaptor Complex Drives Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis in Plants

    Astrid Gadeyne;Clara Sánchez-Rodríguez;Steffen Vanneste;Simone Di Rubbo

  • Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition

    Stefaan Blancke;Frank Van Breusegem;Geert De Jaeger;Johan Braeckman

  • A Tandem Affinity Purification-based Technology Platform to Study the Cell Cycle Interactome in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Jelle Van Leene;Jelle Van Leene;Hilde Stals;Hilde Stals;Dominique Eeckhout;Dominique Eeckhout;Geert Persiau;Geert Persiau

  • ANGUSTIFOLIA3 Binds to SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Complexes to Regulate Transcription during Arabidopsis Leaf Development

    Liesbeth Vercruyssen;Aurine Verkest;Nathalie Gonzalez;Ken S. Heyndrickx

  • Auxin-Dependent Cell Cycle Reactivation through Transcriptional Regulation of Arabidopsis E2Fa by Lateral Organ Boundary Proteins

    Barbara Berckmans;Valya Vassileva;Stephan P.C. Schmid;Sara Maes

  • Boosting heterologous protein production in transgenic dicotyledonous seeds using Phaseolus vulgaris regulatory sequences

    Geert De Jaeger;Stanley Scheffer;Anni Jacobs;Mukund Zambre

  • Capturing the phosphorylation and protein interaction landscape of the plant TOR kinase.

    Jelle Van Leene;Chao Han;Chao Han;Astrid Gadeyne;Dominique Eeckhout

  • Plants as bioreactors for protein production: avoiding the problem of transgene silencing

    Chris De Wilde;Helena Van Houdt;Sylvie De Buck;Geert Angenon

  • CDKB1;1 Forms a Functional Complex with CYCA2;3 to Suppress Endocycle Onset

    Véronique Boudolf;Tim Lammens;Joanna Boruc;Jelle Van Leene

  • The Clathrin Adaptor Complex AP-2 Mediates Endocytosis of BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1 in Arabidopsis

    Simone Di Rubbo;Niloufer G. Irani;Soo Youn Kim;Zheng-Yi Xu

  • Targeted Degradation of Abscisic Acid Receptors Is Mediated by the Ubiquitin Ligase Substrate Adaptor DDA1 in Arabidopsis

    María Luisa Irigoyen;Elisa Iniesto;Lesia Rodriguez;María Isabel Puga

  • Sulfenome mining in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Cezary Waszczak;Salma Akter;Dominique Eeckhout;Geert Persiau

  • An improved toolbox to unravel the plant cellular machinery by tandem affinity purification of Arabidopsis protein complexes

    Jelle Van Leene;Dominique Eeckhout;Bernard Cannoot;Nancy De Winne

Frequent Co-Authors

Kris Gevaert
Kris Gevaert Ghent University
Dirk Inzé
Dirk Inzé Ghent University
Erwin Witters
Erwin Witters Kemin Animal Nutrition & Health
Daniël Van Damme
Daniël Van Damme Ghent University
Anna Depicker
Anna Depicker Ghent University
Alain Goossens
Alain Goossens Ghent University
Lieven De Veylder
Lieven De Veylder Ghent University
Klaas Vandepoele
Klaas Vandepoele Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie
Jiří Friml
Jiří Friml Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Frank Van Breusegem
Frank Van Breusegem Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Molecular Biology is a versatile field that opens doors to a wide range of careers in healthcare and research. Many students with a molecular biology background consider transitioning into allied health professions or advanced nursing roles, which increasingly offer flexible study options online.

For those interested in speech-language pathology, it's important to choose asha approved slp programs to ensure your degree meets industry standards. Students from non-SLP backgrounds can bridge the gap into this field through speech pathology bridge programs, designed to prepare them for graduate study and certification.

Some molecular biology graduates pursue nursing as an alternative pathway, with opportunities to enroll in the best online bsn programs for non nurses. These accelerated programs offer a fast track for career changers eager to enter the nursing profession.

Advanced practice roles are also an option, such as psychiatric nurse practitioners. You can research potential earnings in this field with the latest data on dnp psychiatric nurse practitioner salary by state.

Best Scientists Citing Geert De Jaeger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles