World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 50 4401 4049 1702 1525 83 13817

Grant L. Campbell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Grant L. Campbell between 1961 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Grant L. Campbell published across 65 years, from 1961 to 2025, averaging 1.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2006. 12 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1961 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2006. 1961: 1 publication 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 9 publications
1961 2025

102 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Grant L. Campbell: publications per year, 1961 to 2025
Year Publications
1961 1
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 4
1992 3
1993 2
1994 1
1995 3
1996 1
1997 3
1998 4
1999 3
2000 3
2001 9
2002 3
2003 5
2004 3
2005 8
2006 10
2007 3
2008 4
2009 3
2010 1
2011 4
2012 3
2013 1
2014 0
2015 0
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 3
2025 9
Total 102
Download as CSV

Grant L. Campbell publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grant L. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 75–84 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 83 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55 83
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Grant L. Campbell D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grant L. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129 50
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Grant L. Campbell is affiliated with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields related to soil science, agronomy, and environmental sustainability.

The scientist's recent publications cover topics including soil quality monitoring, soil health indicators, and bioenergy crop sustainability. Notable recent papers include:

  • Continental Scale Soil Monitoring: A Proposed Multi-Scale Framing of Soil Quality (2025, European Journal of Soil Science)
  • Developing a robust soil health indicator selection framework (2024, Open Access Government)

Campbell's research interests often intersect with the study of bioenergy crops and their sustainability under changing climate conditions, as demonstrated by coauthored works focusing on Miscanthus and Willow bioenergy crops.

The scientist frequently collaborates with colleagues such as Pete Smith, Mohamed Abdalla, Astley Hastings, David A. Robinson, and Panos Panagos. Their collaborative work often appears in journals like Agronomy, European Journal of Soil Science, Preprints.org, and Open Access Government.

  • Agronomy
  • European Journal of Soil Science
  • Preprints.org
  • Open Access Government
  • Environmental Pollution

Their fields of study encompass agronomy and crop science, biomedical engineering, mechanics of materials, atmospheric science, and soil science. This multidisciplinary approach supports research in various aspects of soil and environmental health.

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Soil Science

Their main research topics have included:

  • Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology

Overall, Grant L. Campbell's work addresses the intersection of soil science and sustainable bioenergy crop management, with an emphasis on understanding soil health and evaluating environmental impacts in the context of changing climate conditions.

Best Publications

  • The Outbreak of West Nile Virus Infection in the New York City Area in 1999

    D Nash;F Mostashari;A Fine;J Miller

  • Epidemiology and Transmission Dynamics of West Nile Virus Disease

    Edward B. Hayes;Nicholas Komar;Roger S. Nasci;Susan P. Montgomery

  • Estimated global incidence of Japanese encephalitis: a systematic review

    Grant L Campbell;Susan L Hills;Marc Fischer;Julie A Jacobson

  • Epidemic West Nile encephalitis, New York, 1999: results of a household-based seroepidemiological survey

    Farzad Mostashari;Farzad Mostashari;Michel L Bunning;Paul T Kitsutani;Daniel A Singer

  • West Nile virus

    Unknown

  • Neurologic Manifestations and Outcome of West Nile Virus Infection

    James J. Sejvar;Maryam B. Haddad;Bruce C. Tierney;Grant L. Campbell

  • Chikungunya virus in US travelers returning from India, 2006.

    Robert S. Lanciotti;Olga L. Kosoy;Janeen J. Laven;Amanda J. Panella

  • Virology, pathology, and clinical manifestations of West Nile virus disease.

    Edward B. Hayes;James J. Sejvar;Sherif R. Zaki;Robert S. Lanciotti

  • Persistence of virus-reactive serum immunoglobulin m antibody in confirmed west nile virus encephalitis cases.

    John T. Roehrig;Denis Nash;Beth Maldin;Anne Labowitz

  • The Epidemic of West Nile Virus in the United States, 2002

    Daniel R. O'Leary;Anthony A. Marfin;Susan P. Montgomery;Aaron M. Kipp

  • Tick-borne diseases in the United States.

    Spach Dh;Liles Wc;Campbell Gl;Quick Re

  • Diagnosis of early Lyme disease by polymerase chain reaction amplification and culture of skin biopsies from erythema migrans lesions.

    I Schwartz;G P Wormser;J J Schwartz;D Cooper

  • Surveillance for Lyme disease--United States, 1992-1998.

    K A Orloski;E B Hayes;G L Campbell;D T Dennis

  • Possible West Nile virus transmission to an infant through breast-feeding - Michigan, 2002

    A. Ognjan;M. L. Boulton;P. Somsel;M. G. Stobierski

  • West Nile Virus Disease: A Descriptive Study of 228 Patients Hospitalized in a 4-County Region of Colorado in 2003

    Amy V. Bode;James J. Sejvar;W. John Pape;Grant L. Campbell

  • West Nile virus-associated flaccid paralysis.

    James J. Sejvar;Amy V. Bode;Anthony A. Marfin;Grant L. Campbell

  • Birth outcomes following West Nile Virus infection of pregnant women in the United States: 2003-2004.

    Daniel R. O'Leary;Stephanie Kuhn;Krista L. Kniss;Alison F. Hinckley

  • Widespread West Nile virus activity, eastern United States, 2000.

    Marfin Aa;Petersen Lr;Eidson M;Miller J

  • Clinicopathologic study and laboratory diagnosis of 23 cases with West Nile virus encephalomyelitis.

    Jeannette Guarner;Wun-Ju Shieh;Steve Hunter;Christopher D. Paddock

  • Neurologic manifestations and Outcome of West Nile virus infection. Editorial

    James J. Sejvar;Maryam B. Haddad;Bruce C. Tierney;Grant L. Campbell

  • Epidemic/epizootic West Nile virus in the United States : guidelines for surveillance, prevention, and control. 3rd revision

    Duane J. Gubler;Lyle R. Petersen;John T. Roehrig;Grant L. Campbell

  • Genetic Heterogeneity of Borrelia burgdorferi in the United States

    D. A. Mathiesen;J. H. Oliver;C. P. Kolbert;E. D. Tullson

  • Risk Factors for West Nile Virus Infection and Meningoencephalitis, Romania, 1996

    Linda L. Han;Florin Popovici;James P. Alexander;Velea Laurentia

  • The role of pathology in an investigation of an outbreak of West Nile encephalitis in New York, 1999.

    Wun-Ju Shieh;Jeannette Guarner;Marci Layton;Annie Fine

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony A. Marfin
Anthony A. Marfin A2M Epidemiology
Robert S. Lanciotti
Robert S. Lanciotti Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Edward B. Hayes
Edward B. Hayes Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Lyle R. Petersen
Lyle R. Petersen Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
John T. Roehrig
John T. Roehrig Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Duane J. Gubler
Duane J. Gubler Duke NUS Graduate Medical School
Marc L. Fischer
Marc L. Fischer Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Sherif R. Zaki
Sherif R. Zaki Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Martin E. Schriefer
Martin E. Schriefer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Brad J. Biggerstaff
Brad J. Biggerstaff Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens doors to diverse healthcare and life sciences careers, but many students also explore complementary fields such as health information management. For those interested in medical coding, becoming a certified professional coder offers a specialized pathway with strong job prospects and competitive salaries.

Healthcare information managers play a vital role in managing patient data and ensuring compliance with regulations. Understanding the healthcare information management salary trends helps graduates gauge the financial outlook in this field and plan their career moves accordingly.

For those aiming to enter this sector, choosing the right program is critical. Many opt for a cahiim accredited health information management programs online, which provide flexible learning options and industry-recognized credentials.

Additionally, fast-paced training options like fast track medical billing and coding certificate online programs are gaining popularity. These certificates enable quicker entry into the workforce while building essential skills aligned with healthcare demands.

Best Scientists Citing Grant L. Campbell

Recently Published Articles