World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
9466
World Ranking
5928
National Ranking
406

Rina Gupta publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rina Gupta sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 98 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Rina Gupta D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rina Gupta sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rina Gupta is a researcher affiliated with McGill University in Canada, specializing in psychology with a focus on clinical psychology, developmental and educational psychology, statistics and probability, and cognitive neuroscience. Their research explores multiple aspects related to cognitive function, developmental processes, and psychological well-being.

Gupta's work prominently covers topics including reading and literacy development, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, neuroscience in education and cognitive function, body image and dysmorphia studies, as well as psychotherapy techniques and applications.

Recent publications by Gupta include:

  • Understanding the biological basis of dyslexia at a neural systems level, 2020, Brain Communications
  • CUSTOMERS ATTITUDE TOWARDS USAGE OF E-WALLET, 2023, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Capgras Delusion in Late Onset Postpartum Psychosis and Persistent Delusional Disorder, 2024, BJPsych Open

Frequent coauthors in Gupta's research network include Noor Z. Al Dahhan, John R. Kirby, Donald C. Brien, Allyson G. Harrison, and Douglas P. Munoz. These collaborations reflect a diverse range of expertise contributing to the interdisciplinary nature of Gupta's studies.

Gupta's publication venues further emphasize their engagement with cross-disciplinary scientific platforms and journals such as Brain Communications, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and BJPsych Open.

Best Publications

  • Adolescent Gambling Behavior: A Prevalence Study and Examination of the Correlates Associated with Problem Gambling.

    Rina Gupta;Jeffrey L. Derevensky

  • The Relationship of Impulsivity, Sensation Seeking, Coping, and Substance Use in Youth Gamblers.

    Lia Nower;Jeffrey L. Derevensky;Rina Gupta

  • Psychosocial variables associated with adolescent gambling.

    Karen K. Hardoon;Rina Gupta;Jeffrey L. Derevensky

  • An Empirical Study Examining the Impact of Gambling Advertisements on Adolescent Gambling Attitudes and Behaviors

    Jeffrey Derevensky;Alissa Sklar;Rina Gupta;Carmen Messerlian

  • An international perspective on youth gambling prevalence studies

    Rachel A Volberg;Rina Gupta;Mark D Griffiths;Daniel T Olason

  • Familial and Social Influences on Juvenile Gambling Behavior

    Rina Gupta;Jeffrey Derevensky

  • Youth gambling problems: a public health perspective

    Carmen Messerlian;Jeffrey Derevensky;Rina Gupta

  • An Empirical Examinination of Jacobs' General Theory of Addictions: Do Adolescent Gamblers Fit the Theory?

    Rina Gupta;Jeffrey L. Derevensky

  • Adolescents with gambling problems: from research to treatment.

    Rina Gupta;Jeffrey L. Derevensky

  • Prevalence rates of youth gambling problems: are the current rates inflated?

    Jeffrey L. Derevensky;Rina Gupta;Ken Winters

  • Prevalence estimates of adolescent gambling: a comparison of the SOGS-RA, DSM-IV-J, and the GA 20 questions.

    Jeffrey L. Derevensky;Rina Gupta

  • Risk and protective factors associated with youth problem gambling.

    N. W. Shead;J. L. Derevensky;Rina Gupta

  • The Prevention of Gambling Problems in Youth: A Conceptual Framework

    Laurie M. Dickson;Jeffrey L. Derevensky;Rina Gupta

  • Gambling and risk-taking behavior among university students.

    Jeff Powell;Karen Hardoon;Jeffrey L. Derevensky;Rina Gupta

  • Adolescent gambling: understanding the role of stress and coping.

    Tanya Bergevin;Rina Gupta;Jeffrey Derevensky;Felicia Kaufman

  • Youth Gambling Problems: Examining Risk and Protective Factors

    Laurie Dickson;Jeffrey L. Derevensky;Rina Gupta

  • Video Game Playing and Gambling in Adolescents: Common Risk Factors

    Richard T. A. Wood;Rina Gupta;Jeffrey L. Derevensky;Mark Griffiths

  • The relationship between gambling and video-game playing behavior in children and adolescents

    Rina Gupta;Jeffrey L. Derevensky

  • Empirical measures vs. perceived gambling severity among youth: Why adolescent problem gamblers fail to seek treatment

    Karen Hardoon;Jeffrey L Derevensky;Rina Gupta

  • Lottery playing amongst youth: implications for prevention and social policy.

    Jennifer R. Felsher;Jeffrey L. Derevensky;Rina Gupta

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey L. Derevensky
Jeffrey L. Derevensky McGill University
Mark D. Griffiths
Mark D. Griffiths Nottingham Trent University
Michael J. A. Wohl
Michael J. A. Wohl Carleton University
Alex Blaszczynski
Alex Blaszczynski University of Sydney
Paul Delfabbro
Paul Delfabbro University of Adelaide
Frank Vitaro
Frank Vitaro University of Montreal
Sally M. Gainsbury
Sally M. Gainsbury University of Sydney
Rachel A. Volberg
Rachel A. Volberg University of Massachusetts Amherst
Ken C. Winters
Ken C. Winters Oregon Research Institute
Jason A. Gilliland
Jason A. Gilliland University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying psychology in the USA, it’s important to explore the different online degrees and potential career pathways available. Many students start with a bachelor’s degree in psychology before advancing to master’s or doctoral programs that open doors to specialized roles.

Becoming a licensed therapist is a common goal for psychology graduates, but requirements can vary by state and city. For example, Charlotte licensed therapist requirements emphasize completing graduate-level education, supervised experience, and passing relevant exams. Similarly, licensed therapist requirements in Chesapeake outline a thorough process for prospective professionals.

Those interested in urban settings should review Chicago licensed therapist education requirements to understand the qualifications needed there. On the West Coast, Chula Vista licensed therapist requirements detail their own unique licensure steps and continuing education needs.

As online psychology degrees become more accessible, students can blend flexible study with career-focused training—putting you on track to make a real impact in mental health, counseling, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Rina Gupta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles