World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4314
World Ranking
10919
National Ranking
755

Nigel E. Turner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nigel E. Turner sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 157 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nigel E. Turner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nigel E. Turner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A weak scientific basis for gaming disorder: Let us err on the side of caution

    Antonius J. van Rooij;Christopher J. Ferguson;Michelle Colder Carras;Daniel Kardefelt-Winther

  • Community effects of the opening of the Niagara casino

    Robin Room;Nigel E. Turner;Anc A Ialomiteanu

  • Development and validation of the drug-taking confidence questionnaire: a measure of coping self-efficacy.

    Sherrilyn M. Sklar;Helen M. Annis;Nigel E. Turner

  • A brief measure for the assessment of coping self-efficacy among alcohol and other drug users

    Sherrilyn M. Sklar;Nigel E. Turner

  • The Experience of Gambling and its Role in Problem Gambling

    Nigel E. Turner;Masood Zangeneh;Nina Littman-Sharp

  • Life Skills, Mathematical Reasoning and Critical Thinking: A Curriculum for the Prevention of Problem Gambling

    Nigel E. Turner;John Macdonald;Matthew Somerset

  • Pathways to Pathological Gambling: Component Analysis of Variables Related to Pathological Gambling

    Nigel E. Turner;Umesh Jain;Warren Spence;Masood Zangeneh

  • Measurement of antecedents to drug and alcohol use: Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Drug-Taking Situations (IDTS).

    Nigel E. Turner;Helen M. Annis;Sherrilyn M. Sklar

  • How do slot machines and other electronic gambling machines actually work

    Nigel Turner;Roger Horbay

  • A Yoga Intervention for Posttraumatic Stress: A Preliminary Randomized Control Trial.

    Farah Jindani;Nigel Turner;Sat Bir S. Khalsa

  • The Relationship of Problem Gambling to Criminal Behavior in a Sample of Canadian Male Federal Offenders

    Nigel E. Turner;Denise L. Preston;Crystal Saunders;Steven McAvoy

  • Understanding the lives of problem gamers: The meaning, purpose, and influences of video gaming

    Jing Shi;Rebecca Renwick;Nigel E. Turner;Bonnie Kirsh

  • Reliability, Validity, and Classification Accuracy of the DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Gambling Disorder and Comparison to DSM-IV

    Randy Stinchfield;John McCready;Nigel E. Turner;Susana Jimenez-Murcia

  • An examination of internet and land-based gambling among adolescents in three Canadian provinces: results from the youth gambling survey (YGS)

    Tara Elton-Marshall;Tara Elton-Marshall;Tara Elton-Marshall;Scott T. Leatherdale;Nigel E. Turner;Nigel E. Turner

  • Factors Influencing Recovery from Different Addictions

    Anja Koski-jännes;Nigel Turner

  • Problem Gambling Among Ontario Students: Associations with Substance Abuse, Mental Health Problems, Suicide Attempts, and Delinquent Behaviours

    Steven Cook;Nigel E. Turner;Nigel E. Turner;Bruce Ballon;Bruce Ballon;Angela Paglia-Boak

  • Recovery from problem gambling without formal treatment

    Tony Toneatto;John Cunningham;David Hodgins;Michelle Adams

  • Public Awareness of Responsible Gambling and Gambling Behaviours in Ontario

    Nigel E. Turner;Jamie Wiebe;Agata Falkowski-Ham;Jon Kelly

  • Gamblers Anonymous as a Recovery Pathway: A Scoping Review

    Andrée Schuler;Peter Ferentzy;Nigel E. Turner;Wayne Skinner

  • Internet-Based Interventions for Problem Gambling: Scoping Review

    Mark van der Maas;Jing Shi;Tara Elton-Marshall;David C Hodgins

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert E. Mann
Robert E. Mann Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Hayley Hamilton
Hayley Hamilton Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Flora I. Matheson
Flora I. Matheson University of Toronto
Edward M. Adlaf
Edward M. Adlaf Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Jürgen Rehm
Jürgen Rehm University of Toronto
Marc N. Potenza
Marc N. Potenza Yale University
Alex Blaszczynski
Alex Blaszczynski University of Sydney
Tony Toneatto
Tony Toneatto University of Toronto
Scott T. Leatherdale
Scott T. Leatherdale University of Waterloo
David C. Hodgins
David C. Hodgins University of Calgary

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Nigel E. Turner