World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
18464
World Ranking
4707
National Ranking
2611

Richard L. Moreland publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Moreland sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 91 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Richard L. Moreland D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Moreland sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard L. Moreland was affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their academic career involved research contributions to various scientific fields although specific details about their research topics and publications are not available.

No records were found regarding recent papers, frequent co-authors, or typical publication venues. Similarly, there is no data about books published or detailed subfields of study under their name.

Despite the limited available information, it is known that Moreland's work was situated within an academic setting, which typically involves engagement in research, teaching, and possibly collaboration within their institution.

Moreland was deceased at the time of the data compilation, and no awards or recognitions are recorded for their work. The absence of detailed bibliographic and scientific information restricts further elaboration on their scientific contributions or areas of expertise.

Best Publications

  • Small Groups: Key Readings

    John M. Levine;Richard L. Moreland

  • Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory

    Diane Wei Liang;Richard Moreland;Linda Argote

  • Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Learning from the Experience of Others☆

    Linda Argote;Paul Ingram;John M Levine;Richard L Moreland

  • Progress in Small Group Research

    John M. Levine;Richard L. Moreland

  • Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication?

    Richard L. Moreland;Larissa Myaskovsky

  • Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations.

    Richard L Moreland

  • Role of the self-concept in the perception of others.

    Hazel Markus;Jeanne Smith;Richard L. Moreland

  • Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance.

    Richard L. Moreland;Linda Argote;Ranjani Krishnan

  • Socialization in Small Groups: Temporal Changes in Individual-Group Relations1

    Richard L. Moreland;John M. Levine

  • Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes

    Michael A. Hogg;R. Scott Tindale

  • Time, Change, and Development The Temporal Perspective on Groups

    Holly Arrow;Marshall Scott Poole;Kelly Bouas Henry;Susan Wheelan

  • Exposure effects in person perception: Familiarity, similarity, and attraction

    Richard L. Moreland;Robert B. Zajonc

  • Training People to Work in Groups

    Richard L. Moreland;Linda Argote;Ranjani Krishnan

  • Exposure effects in the classroom: The development of affinity among students

    Richard L Moreland;Scott R Beach

  • Group Socialization: Theory and Research

    John M. Levine;Richard L. Moreland

  • Alcohol and Group Formation A Multimodal Investigation of the Effects of Alcohol on Emotion and Social Bonding

    Michael A. Sayette;Kasey G. Creswell;John D. Dimoff;Catharine Edith Ann Fairbairn

  • Culture and socialization in work groups

    John M. Levine;Richard L. Moreland

  • Sources of Resistance to Mergers Between Groups1

    Pamela R. Haunschild;Richard L. Moreland;Audrey J. Murrell

  • Are Dyads Really Groups

    Richard L. Moreland

  • Socialization in Organizations and Work Groups

    Richard L. Moreland;John M. Levine

Frequent Co-Authors

John M. Levine
John M. Levine University of Pittsburgh
Linda Argote
Linda Argote Carnegie Mellon University
Robert B. Zajonc
Robert B. Zajonc Stanford University
Michael A. Sayette
Michael A. Sayette University of Pittsburgh
Michael A. Hogg
Michael A. Hogg Claremont Graduate University
Marshall Scott Poole
Marshall Scott Poole University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jeffrey F. Cohn
Jeffrey F. Cohn University of Pittsburgh
Ranjani Krishnan
Ranjani Krishnan Michigan State University
Joseph E. McGrath
Joseph E. McGrath University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Hazel Rose Markus
Hazel Rose Markus Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Psychology, there are many related online degrees and rewarding career pathways to consider. Social work is a popular choice, allowing you to support individuals, families, and communities through various challenges. Beyond a Psychology degree, becoming a social worker requires careful attention to education and licensing requirements—these can vary by state.

For example, Missouri social work education requirements include completing a CSWE-accredited degree and obtaining state licensure. In contrast, the requirements to be a social worker in Montana may involve different coursework and practical experience expectations.

Nebraska offers a unique pathway for aspiring social workers; understanding the Nebraska social work education requirements is essential for meeting both academic and licensure standards. Similarly, if you plan on becoming a social worker in Nevada, familiarize yourself with the state’s specific guidelines.

Online degrees can provide flexibility for working professionals and those with family responsibilities. No matter your location, researching regional requirements ensures you choose the right educational path for your psychology-related career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Richard L. Moreland

Recently Published Articles