| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business and Management | 43 | 1371 | 1284 | 578 | 528 | 97 | 48546 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Richard L. Daft between 1977 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard L. Daft published across 44 years, from 1977 to 2020, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 1984. 2 of the 123 publications appeared in the last two years.
123 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1977 | 1 |
| 1978 | 8 |
| 1979 | 9 |
| 1980 | 7 |
| 1981 | 2 |
| 1982 | 2 |
| 1983 | 6 |
| 1984 | 11 |
| 1985 | 2 |
| 1986 | 9 |
| 1987 | 7 |
| 1988 | 3 |
| 1989 | 2 |
| 1990 | 4 |
| 1991 | 1 |
| 1992 | 1 |
| 1993 | 2 |
| 1994 | 1 |
| 1995 | 2 |
| 1996 | 1 |
| 1997 | 0 |
| 1998 | 2 |
| 1999 | 0 |
| 2000 | 2 |
| 2001 | 3 |
| 2002 | 4 |
| 2003 | 2 |
| 2004 | 1 |
| 2005 | 1 |
| 2006 | 2 |
| 2007 | 1 |
| 2008 | 3 |
| 2009 | 0 |
| 2010 | 2 |
| 2011 | 1 |
| 2012 | 3 |
| 2013 | 2 |
| 2014 | 4 |
| 2015 | 1 |
| 2016 | 3 |
| 2017 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3 |
| 2019 | 1 |
| 2020 | 1 |
| Total | 123 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Daft sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 97 publications — 24th percentile
24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 35–39 | 2 | |
| 40–44 | 2 | |
| 45–49 | 5 | |
| 50–54 | 20 | |
| 55–59 | 39 | |
| 60–64 | 66 | |
| 65–69 | 52 | |
| 70–74 | 80 | |
| 75–79 | 83 | |
| 80–84 | 116 | |
| 85–89 | 94 | |
| 90–94 | 111 | |
| 95–99 | 122 | 97 |
| 100–104 | 104 | |
| 105–109 | 113 | |
| 110–114 | 96 | |
| 115–119 | 97 | |
| 120–124 | 112 | |
| 125–129 | 93 | |
| 130–134 | 79 | |
| 135–139 | 69 | |
| 140–144 | 80 | |
| 145–149 | 81 | |
| 150–154 | 85 | |
| 155–159 | 50 | |
| 160–164 | 74 | |
| 165–169 | 61 | |
| 170–174 | 40 | |
| 175–179 | 44 | |
| 180–184 | 47 | |
| 185–189 | 59 | |
| 190–194 | 35 | |
| 195–199 | 37 | |
| 200–204 | 49 | |
| 205–209 | 48 | |
| 210–214 | 34 | |
| 215–219 | 31 | |
| 220–224 | 37 | |
| 225–229 | 34 | |
| 230–234 | 25 | |
| 235–239 | 28 | |
| 240–244 | 34 | |
| 245–249 | 28 | |
| 250–254 | 23 | |
| 255–259 | 22 | |
| 260–264 | 11 | |
| 265–269 | 16 | |
| 270–274 | 23 | |
| 275–279 | 12 | |
| 280–284 | 16 | |
| 285–289 | 10 | |
| 290–294 | 12 | |
| 295–299 | 12 | |
| 300–304 | 8 | |
| 305–309 | 13 | |
| 310–314 | 13 | |
| 315–319 | 6 | |
| 320–324 | 10 | |
| 325–329 | 9 | |
| 330–334 | 7 | |
| 335–339 | 10 | |
| 340–344 | 10 | |
| 345–349 | 7 | |
| 350–354 | 4 | |
| 355–359 | 10 | |
| 360–364 | 3 | |
| 365–369 | 7 | |
| 370–374 | 2 | |
| 375–379 | 8 | |
| 380–384 | 4 | |
| 385–389 | 5 | |
| 390–394 | 5 | |
| 395–399 | 2 | |
| 400–404 | 2 | |
| 405–409 | 4 | |
| 410–414 | 3 | |
| 415–419 | 2 | |
| 420–424 | 5 | |
| 425–429 | 3 | |
| 430–434 | 1 | |
| 435 | 1 | |
| 436+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Daft sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 43 D-Index — 55th percentile
55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 156 | |
| 31 | 159 | |
| 32 | 171 | |
| 33 | 161 | |
| 34 | 135 | |
| 35 | 124 | |
| 36 | 114 | |
| 37 | 111 | |
| 38 | 103 | |
| 39 | 89 | |
| 40 | 81 | |
| 41 | 97 | |
| 42 | 80 | |
| 43 | 69 | 43 |
| 44 | 68 | |
| 45 | 63 | |
| 46 | 54 | |
| 47 | 69 | |
| 48 | 50 | |
| 49 | 58 | |
| 50 | 54 | |
| 51 | 62 | |
| 52 | 54 | |
| 53 | 43 | |
| 54 | 49 | |
| 55 | 35 | |
| 56 | 40 | |
| 57 | 44 | |
| 58 | 34 | |
| 59 | 29 | |
| 60 | 48 | |
| 61 | 32 | |
| 62 | 30 | |
| 63 | 22 | |
| 64 | 22 | |
| 65 | 19 | |
| 66 | 20 | |
| 67 | 18 | |
| 68 | 17 | |
| 69 | 21 | |
| 70 | 20 | |
| 71 | 19 | |
| 72 | 14 | |
| 73 | 10 | |
| 74 | 16 | |
| 75 | 24 | |
| 76 | 13 | |
| 77 | 19 | |
| 78 | 8 | |
| 79 | 6 | |
| 80 | 4 | |
| 81 | 12 | |
| 82 | 7 | |
| 83 | 7 | |
| 84 | 6 | |
| 85 | 10 | |
| 86 | 4 | |
| 87 | 11 | |
| 88 | 6 | |
| 89+ | 96 |
Richard L. Daft;Robert H. Lengel
Richard L. Daft;Karl E. Weick
Unknown
Richard L. Daft;Robert H. Lengel;Linda Klebe Trevino
Richard L. Daft;Robert H. Lengel
Richard L. Daft
Sara L. Rynes;Jean M. Bartunek;Richard L. Daft
Unknown
Richard L. Daft;Norman B. Macintosh
Linda Klebe Trevino;Robert H. Lengel;Richard L. Daft
Unknown
Robert H. Lengel;Richard L. Daft
Richard L. Daft;Arie Y. Lewin
Linda Trevino;Richard Daft;Robert Lengel
Michael Withey;Richard L. Daft;William H. Cooper
Unknown
Richard L. Daft;John C. Wiginton
George P. Huber;Richard L. Daft
Richard Daft;George Huber
Richard L. Daft
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.