What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary areas of study are Botany, Bacteria, Planctomycetes, Anammoxosome and Microbiology.
His research investigates the link between Botany and topics such as Biophysics that cross with problems in Cell wall, Glycine and Freeze substitution.
His biological study deals with issues like Ribosomal RNA, which deal with fields such as Archaea, Polymerase chain reaction, Candidate division TM7 and Candidate division.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Ultrastructure, Pirellulosome, Verrucomicrobia, Bacterial cell structure and Cell biology in addition to Planctomycetes.
Richard I. Webb carries out multidisciplinary research, doing studies in Anammoxosome and Anammox.
His studies in Microbiology integrate themes in fields like Microbial population biology, Effluent, Chemical engineering, Dissolution and Wastewater.
His most cited work include:
- Missing lithotroph identified as new planctomycete (1160 citations)
- Candidatus "Scalindua brodae", sp. nov., Candidatus "Scalindua wagneri", sp. nov., two new species of anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria. (486 citations)
- Candidatus "Anammoxoglobus propionicus" a new propionate oxidizing species of anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria (431 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Richard I. Webb mainly investigates Microbiology, Botany, Bacteria, Ultrastructure and Cell biology.
He incorporates Microbiology and Anammox in his research.
His study on Bacteria is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Biochemistry.
His Ultrastructure study combines topics in areas such as Biophysics and Electron tomography.
His research in Cell biology intersects with topics in Cell division, Endocytosis, Zebrafish and Green fluorescent protein.
His study looks at the relationship between Planctomycetes and fields such as Nucleoid, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.
He most often published in these fields:
- Microbiology (26.86%)
- Botany (17.71%)
- Bacteria (13.71%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?
- Cell biology (10.29%)
- Electron microscope (6.29%)
- Microbiology (26.86%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Cell biology, Electron microscope, Microbiology, Biophysics and Ultrastructure.
His Cell biology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Immersion and Comprehension.
His Electron microscope study which covers Scanning electron microscope that intersects with Transmission electron microscopy and Resolution.
His Microbiology research focuses on Virulence and how it relates to Proteome.
His research integrates issues of Nuclear membrane, Biosynthesis, Ethylene, Cell Compartmentation and Protein structure in his study of Biophysics.
As part of one scientific family, Richard I. Webb deals mainly with the area of Ultrastructure, narrowing it down to issues related to the Electron tomography, and often Immunogold labelling.
Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Identification of the primary lesion of toxic aluminum in plant roots (137 citations)
- Modular Detection of GFP-Labeled Proteins for Rapid Screening by Electron Microscopy in Cells and Organisms (77 citations)
- Crosstalk between sugarcane and a plant-growth promoting Burkholderia species (41 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His main research concerns Cell biology, Microbiology, Fimbriae Proteins, Soil microbiology and Comprehension.
His Cell biology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Confocal, Cell and Electron microscope.
His Fimbriae Proteins study is focused on Pilus, Virulence, Fimbria and Escherichia coli.
His research in Pilus intersects with topics in Bacterial adhesin and Pathogenicity island.
Richard I. Webb combines subjects such as Rhizosphere, Aerenchyma, Metabolic pathway and Biofilm with his study of Soil microbiology.
His Rhizosphere study combines topics in areas such as Diazotroph and Burkholderia.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
