What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Air pollution
- Meteorology
Aerosol, Environmental chemistry, Total organic carbon, Meteorology and Sulfate are his primary areas of study.
His research integrates issues of Nitrate, Pollution and Mass spectrometry in his study of Aerosol.
His work in Environmental chemistry covers topics such as Ozone which are related to areas like Sulfur.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Biomass burning, Fine particulate and Chemical mass balance in addition to Total organic carbon.
His Meteorology research focuses on Particulates and how it connects with Air quality index, Volatile organic compound, Organic matter and Mixing ratio.
His Sulfate research includes elements of Mineralogy, Troposphere and Chloride.
His most cited work include:
- A study of secondary organic aerosol formation in the anthropogenic-influenced southeastern United States (408 citations)
- Single-particle mass spectrometry of tropospheric aerosol particles (334 citations)
- Variability in nocturnal nitrogen oxide processing and its role in regional air quality. (255 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of investigation include Aerosol, Environmental chemistry, Total organic carbon, Particulates and Atmospheric sciences.
The various areas that Richard E. Peltier examines in his Aerosol study include Sulfate, Troposphere, Pollution and Mass spectrometry.
His work is dedicated to discovering how Troposphere, Atmosphere are connected with Aerosol composition and other disciplines.
His study in Environmental chemistry is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Panache and Air quality index.
His Total organic carbon study also includes fields such as
- Organic matter that connect with fields like Volatile organic compound,
- Altitude and related Plume.
His biological study deals with issues like Seasonality, which deal with fields such as HYSPLIT.
He most often published in these fields:
- Aerosol (65.43%)
- Environmental chemistry (51.85%)
- Total organic carbon (32.10%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Environmental health (13.58%)
- Air pollution (11.11%)
- Socioeconomic status (3.70%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Richard E. Peltier focuses on Environmental health, Air pollution, Socioeconomic status, Indoor air quality and Under five children.
His Air pollution research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Rush hour, Particulates, Pollutant and Air quality index.
The concepts of his Particulates study are interwoven with issues in Tobacco smoke, Environmental resource management and Wet season.
His Pollutant research incorporates themes from Megacity, Wind speed and Air pollutants.
His studies in Air quality index integrate themes in fields like Serum amyloid A, Air pollution exposure, Proinflammatory cytokine and Veterinary medicine.
Among his Socioeconomic status studies, you can observe a synthesis of other disciplines of science such as Error variance, Indoor air pollutants, Confounding and Respiratory infection.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Monitoring particulate matter in India: recent trends and future outlook (39 citations)
- Associations between Indoor Air Pollution and Acute Respiratory Infections among Under-Five Children in Afghanistan: Do SES and Sex Matter? (14 citations)
- Mobile monitoring of air and noise pollution in Philadelphia neighborhoods during summer 2017. (10 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Air pollution
- Meteorology
Richard E. Peltier spends much of his time researching Air pollution, Environmental resource management, Air quality index, Government and Sampling.
Richard E. Peltier has researched Air pollution in several fields, including Hydrology and Rush hour.
His study on Environmental resource management is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Particulates.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
