| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 43 | 3298 | 3074 | 5 | 5 | 194 | 6172 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Ramakrishnan M. Nair between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ramakrishnan M. Nair published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2023. 34 of the 216 publications appeared in the last two years.
216 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1996 | 1 |
| 1997 | 0 |
| 1998 | 0 |
| 1999 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0 |
| 2002 | 1 |
| 2003 | 1 |
| 2004 | 4 |
| 2005 | 1 |
| 2006 | 6 |
| 2007 | 5 |
| 2008 | 6 |
| 2009 | 16 |
| 2010 | 19 |
| 2011 | 2 |
| 2012 | 3 |
| 2013 | 6 |
| 2014 | 5 |
| 2015 | 4 |
| 2016 | 6 |
| 2017 | 6 |
| 2018 | 9 |
| 2019 | 8 |
| 2020 | 23 |
| 2021 | 15 |
| 2022 | 9 |
| 2023 | 26 |
| 2024 | 13 |
| 2025 | 21 |
| Total | 216 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ramakrishnan M. Nair sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 194 publications — 75th percentile
75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 36–40 | 2 | |
| 41–45 | 7 | |
| 46–50 | 40 | |
| 51–55 | 58 | |
| 56–60 | 60 | |
| 61–65 | 107 | |
| 66–70 | 130 | |
| 71–75 | 153 | |
| 76–80 | 191 | |
| 81–85 | 199 | |
| 86–90 | 206 | |
| 91–95 | 218 | |
| 96–100 | 226 | |
| 101–105 | 227 | |
| 106–110 | 247 | |
| 111–115 | 255 | |
| 116–120 | 253 | |
| 121–125 | 233 | |
| 126–130 | 219 | |
| 131–135 | 201 | |
| 136–140 | 194 | |
| 141–145 | 176 | |
| 146–150 | 157 | |
| 151–155 | 147 | |
| 156–160 | 151 | |
| 161–165 | 159 | |
| 166–170 | 137 | |
| 171–175 | 128 | |
| 176–180 | 126 | |
| 181–185 | 98 | |
| 186–190 | 114 | |
| 191–195 | 100 | 194 |
| 196–200 | 90 | |
| 201–205 | 71 | |
| 206–210 | 98 | |
| 211–215 | 70 | |
| 216–220 | 86 | |
| 221–225 | 61 | |
| 226–230 | 58 | |
| 231–235 | 53 | |
| 236–240 | 64 | |
| 241–245 | 39 | |
| 246–250 | 46 | |
| 251–255 | 51 | |
| 256–260 | 36 | |
| 261–265 | 44 | |
| 266–270 | 35 | |
| 271–275 | 30 | |
| 276–280 | 33 | |
| 281–285 | 35 | |
| 286–290 | 36 | |
| 291–295 | 26 | |
| 296–300 | 26 | |
| 301–305 | 31 | |
| 306–310 | 30 | |
| 311–315 | 21 | |
| 316–320 | 29 | |
| 321–325 | 14 | |
| 326–330 | 15 | |
| 331–335 | 15 | |
| 336–340 | 17 | |
| 341–345 | 15 | |
| 346–350 | 12 | |
| 351–355 | 17 | |
| 356–360 | 18 | |
| 361–365 | 12 | |
| 366–370 | 11 | |
| 371–375 | 6 | |
| 376–380 | 6 | |
| 381–385 | 11 | |
| 386–390 | 9 | |
| 391–395 | 10 | |
| 396–400 | 8 | |
| 401–405 | 4 | |
| 406–410 | 9 | |
| 411–415 | 11 | |
| 416–420 | 4 | |
| 421–425 | 7 | |
| 426–430 | 4 | |
| 431–435 | 3 | |
| 436–440 | 5 | |
| 441–445 | 8 | |
| 446–450 | 6 | |
| 451–455 | 7 | |
| 456–460 | 5 | |
| 461–465 | 6 | |
| 466 | 2 | |
| 467+ | 99 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ramakrishnan M. Nair sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 43 D-Index — 52nd percentile
52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 200 | |
| 31 | 236 | |
| 32 | 253 | |
| 33 | 283 | |
| 34 | 288 | |
| 35 | 240 | |
| 36 | 246 | |
| 37 | 243 | |
| 38 | 247 | |
| 39 | 229 | |
| 40 | 232 | |
| 41 | 230 | |
| 42 | 228 | |
| 43 | 219 | 43 |
| 44 | 193 | |
| 45 | 164 | |
| 46 | 158 | |
| 47 | 143 | |
| 48 | 131 | |
| 49 | 127 | |
| 50 | 122 | |
| 51 | 122 | |
| 52 | 110 | |
| 53 | 102 | |
| 54 | 98 | |
| 55 | 79 | |
| 56 | 85 | |
| 57 | 88 | |
| 58 | 91 | |
| 59 | 62 | |
| 60 | 61 | |
| 61 | 59 | |
| 62 | 54 | |
| 63 | 61 | |
| 64 | 59 | |
| 65 | 58 | |
| 66 | 41 | |
| 67 | 49 | |
| 68 | 39 | |
| 69 | 32 | |
| 70 | 40 | |
| 71 | 47 | |
| 72 | 38 | |
| 73 | 28 | |
| 74 | 29 | |
| 75 | 28 | |
| 76 | 22 | |
| 77 | 21 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 26 | |
| 80 | 19 | |
| 81 | 16 | |
| 82 | 12 | |
| 83 | 16 | |
| 84 | 14 | |
| 85 | 11 | |
| 86 | 17 | |
| 87 | 13 | |
| 88 | 10 | |
| 89 | 12 | |
| 90 | 18 | |
| 91 | 16 | |
| 92 | 16 | |
| 93 | 17 | |
| 94 | 12 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 9 | |
| 97 | 9 | |
| 98 | 11 | |
| 99 | 12 | |
| 100 | 5 | |
| 101 | 8 | |
| 102 | 4 | |
| 103 | 11 | |
| 104 | 5 | |
| 105 | 9 | |
| 106 | 7 | |
| 107 | 4 | |
| 108 | 8 | |
| 109+ | 99 |
Akanksha Sehgal;Kumari Sita;Kadambot H. M. Siddique;Rakesh Kumar
Phillip Nichols;A. Loi;B.J. Nutt;P.M. Evans
John Klingler;Robert Creasy;Lingling Gao;Ramakrishnan M. Nair
Kumari Sita;Akanksha Sehgal;Bindumadhava Hanumantharao;Ramakrishnan Madhavan Nair
Ramakrishnan M Nair;Ray-Yu Yang;Warwick J Easdown;Dil Thavarajah
Bindumadhava HanumanthaRao;Ramakrishnan M. Nair;Harsh Nayyar
Abdul Rasheed War;Gaurav Kumar Taggar;Barkat Hussain;Monica Sachdeva Taggar
Ling-Ling Gao;Jonathan P. Anderson;John P. Klingler;Ramakrishnan M. Nair
Unknown
Roland Schafleitner;Ramakrishnan Madhavan Nair;Abhishek Rathore;Yen wei Wang
Manu Priya;Om P. Dhanker;Kadambot H. M. Siddique;Bindumadhava HanumanthaRao
Lomeshwar Sharma;Manu Priya;H. Bindumadhava;R.M. Nair
Unknown
R. M. Nair;R. Schafleitner;L. Kenyon;R. Srinivasan
Sue K. Kim;Ramakrishnan M. Nair;Jayern Lee;Suk-Ha Lee
John P. Klingler;Ramakrishnan M. Nair;Owain R. Edwards;Karam B. Singh
S.R. Ellwood;N.K. D'Souza;Lars Kamphuis;T.I. Burgess
Huei-Mei Chen;Hsin-Mei Ku;Roland Schafleitner;Tejinderjit S. Bains
Unknown
Unknown
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.