World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Radosław Rogoza

Radosław Rogoza

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
3123
World Ranking
11011
National Ranking
17

Radosław Rogoza publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Radosław Rogoza sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 187 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Radosław Rogoza D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Radosław Rogoza sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The bright, the dark, and the blue face of narcissism: The spectrum of narcissism in its relations to the metatraits of personality, self-esteem, and the nomological network of shyness, loneliness, and empathy.

    Radosław Rogoza;Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska;Maria M. Kwiatkowska;Katarzyna Kwiatkowska

  • The Dark Triad and the self-presentation variables of socially desirable responding and self-monitoring

    Christopher Marcin Kowalski;Radosław Rogoza;Philip A. Vernon;Julie Aitken Schermer

  • Predictors of orthorexic behaviours in patients with eating disorders: a preliminary study.

    Anna Brytek-Matera;Radosław Rogoza;Carla Gramaglia;Patrizia Zeppegno

  • Orthorexia and anorexia nervosa: two distinct phenomena? A cross-cultural comparison of orthorexic behaviours in clinical and non-clinical samples.

    C. Gramaglia;A. Brytek-Matera;R. Rogoza;P. Zeppegno

  • Differentiation of the two narcissistic faces in their relations to personality traits and basic values

    Radosław Rogoza;Patrycja Wyszyńska;Marta Maćkiewicz;Jan Cieciuch

  • Dark Triad traits and their structure: An empirical approach

    Radosław Rogoza;Jan Cieciuch

  • Introducing ORTO-R: a revision of ORTO-15 : Based on the re-assessment of original data.

    Radosław Rogoza;Lorenzo M. Donini

  • Analysis of the EAT-26 in a non-clinical sample

    Radosław Rogoza;Anna Brytek-Matera;David Garner

  • Dark triads, tetrads, tents, and cores: Why navigate (research) the jungle of dark personality models without a compass (criterion)?

    Christopher Marcin Kowalski;Radosław Rogoza;Donald H. Saklofske;Julie Aitken Schermer

  • Seeking a Common Framework for Research on Narcissism: An Attempt to Integrate the Different Faces of Narcissism Within the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits

    Radosław Rogoza;Jan Cieciuch;Włodzimierz Strus;Tomasz Baran

  • Emotional Intelligence Structure and Its Relationship with Life Satisfaction and Happiness: New Findings from the Bifactor Model

    Ana Blasco-Belled;Radosław Rogoza;Cristina Torrelles-Nadal;Carles Alsinet

  • Structure of Dark Triad Dirty Dozen Across Eight World Regions

    Radoslaw Rogoza;Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska;Peter K. Jonason;Peter K. Jonason;Jarosław Piotrowski

  • Structural Investigation of the Short Dark Triad Questionnaire in Polish Population

    Radosław Rogoza;Jan Cieciuch

  • Analysis of the psychometric properties of the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale in the Polish adolescent sample

    Maria Magdalena Kwiatkowska;Radosław Rogoza;Katarzyna Kwiatkowska

  • Self-selection biases in psychological studies: Personality and affective disorders are prevalent among participants

    Unknown

  • The structure of the Dark Triad traits: A network analysis

    Cassidy Trahair;Lidia Baran;Maria Flakus;Christopher Marcin Kowalski

  • Narcissistic Isolation and Enmity Concept: Disentangling the Blue and Dark Face of Vulnerable Narcissism

    Radosław Rogoza;Jan Cieciuch;Włodzimierz Strus

  • Narcissistic admiration and rivalry in the context of personality metatraits

    Radosław Rogoza;Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska;Marta Rogoza;Jarosław Piotrowski

  • Narcissism and trust: Differential impact of agentic, antagonistic, and communal narcissism

    Maria Magdalena Kwiatkowska;Tomasz Jułkowski;Radosław Rogoza;Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska

  • The Dark Triad traits and intelligence: Machiavellians are bright, and narcissists and psychopaths are ordinary

    Christopher Marcin Kowalski;Katarzyna Kwiatkowska;Maria Magdalena Kwiatkowska;Klaudia Ponikiewska

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Cieciuch
Jan Cieciuch VIZJA University
Julie Aitken Schermer
Julie Aitken Schermer University of Western Ontario
Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios
Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios Delft University of Technology
Anna Brytek-Matera
Anna Brytek-Matera University of Wrocław
Joonha Park
Joonha Park Kyoto University
Donald H. Saklofske
Donald H. Saklofske University of Western Ontario
Peter K. Jonason
Peter K. Jonason VIZJA University
Brent W. Roberts
Brent W. Roberts University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Amy E. Pinkham
Amy E. Pinkham The University of Texas at Dallas
Sahar Obeid
Sahar Obeid Lebanese American University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Radosław Rogoza

Recently Published Articles