World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
82
Citations
43617
World Ranking
928
National Ranking
505

Phillip Rogaway publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip Rogaway sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 165 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Phillip Rogaway D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phillip Rogaway sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - ACM Paris Kanellakis Theory and Practice Award For their development of the field of Practice-Oriented Provable-Security and its widespread impact on the theory and practice of cryptography and security.

Overview

Phillip Rogaway is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their work primarily concentrates on computer science, with a strong focus on cryptography and related fields.

Rogaway's research spans several subfields, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Information Systems

The scientist's main topics of work cover a broad spectrum within the realm of data security and privacy:

  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Cloud Data Security Solutions

Phillip Rogaway has contributed to publications in several venues, including:

  • Journal of Cryptology
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
  • Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Rogaway are:

  • The Design and Evolution of OCB, 2021, Journal of Cryptology
  • Reimagining Secret Sharing: Creating a Safer and More Versatile Primitive by Adding Authenticity, Correcting Errors, and Reducing Randomness Requirements, 2020, DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
  • Reimagining Secret Sharing: Creating a Safer and More Versatile Primitive by Adding Authenticity, Correcting Errors, and Reducing Randomness Requirements, 2020, Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies

The scientist often collaborates with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Mihir Bellare
  • John Chan
  • Ted Krovetz
  • Wei-Min Dai
  • Wei Dai

In recognition of their contributions, Phillip Rogaway received the ACM Paris Kanellakis Theory and Practice Award in 2009. This award cited their role in the development of Practice-Oriented Provable-Security and its impact on both theory and practice within cryptography and security.

Best Publications

  • Random oracles are practical: a paradigm for designing efficient protocols

    Mihir Bellare;Phillip Rogaway

  • Entity authentication and key distribution

    Mihir Bellare;Phillip Rogaway

  • Relations Among Notions of Security for Public-Key Encryption Schemes

    Mihir Bellare;Anand Desai;David Pointcheval;David Pointcheval;Phillip Rogaway

  • Authenticated Key Exchange Secure Against Dictionary Attacks.

    Mihir Bellare;David Pointcheval;Phillip Rogaway

  • The security of triple encryption and a framework for code-based game-playing proofs

    Mihir Bellare;Phillip Rogaway

  • Optimal asymmetric encryption

    Mihir Bellare;Phillip Rogaway

  • A concrete security treatment of symmetric encryption

    M. Bellare;A. Desai;E. Jokipii;P. Rogaway

  • The exact security of digital signatures-how to sign with RSA and Rabin

    Mihir Bellare;Phillip Rogaway

  • Cryptographic hash-function basics: Definitions, implications, and separations for preimage resistance, second-preimage resistance, and collision resistance

    Phillip Rogaway;Thomas Shrimpton

  • The round complexity of secure protocols

    D. Beaver;S. Micali;P. Rogaway

  • OCB: a block-cipher mode of operation for efficient authenticated encryption

    Phillip Rogaway;Mihir Bellare;John Black;Ted Krovetz

  • OCB: A block-cipher mode of operation for efficient authenticated encryption

    Phillip Rogaway;Mihir Bellare;John Black

  • Provably secure session key distribution: the three party case

    Mihir Bellare;Phillip Rogaway

  • The Security of the Cipher Block Chaining Message Authentication Code

    Mihir Bellare;Joe Kilian;Phillip Rogaway

  • Black-box analysis of the block-cipher-based hash-function constructions from PGV

    John Black;Phillip Rogaway;Thomas Shrimpton

  • Foundations of Garbled Circuits

    Mihir Bellare;Viet Tung Hoang;Phillip Rogaway

  • UMAC: Fast and Secure Message Authentication

    John Black;Shai Halevi;Hugo Krawczyk;Hugo Krawczyk;Ted Krovetz

  • The Security of Cipher Block Chaining

    Mihir Bellare;Joe Kilian;Phillip Rogaway

  • Authenticated-encryption with associated-data

    Phillip Rogaway

  • Efficient instantiations of tweakable blockciphers and refinements to modes OCB and PMAC

    Phillip Rogaway

  • Reconciling Two Views of Cryptography

    Martí;n Abadi;Phillip Rogaway

Frequent Co-Authors

Mihir Bellare
Mihir Bellare University of California, San Diego
Don Coppersmith
Don Coppersmith IBM (United States)
David Pointcheval
David Pointcheval École Normale Supérieure
David Wagner
David Wagner University of California, Berkeley
Shai Halevi
Shai Halevi Amazon (United States)
Ueli Maurer
Ueli Maurer ETH Zurich
Thomas Ristenpart
Thomas Ristenpart Cornell University
Hugo Krawczyk
Hugo Krawczyk Amazon (United States)
Roch Guerin
Roch Guerin Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering studying Computer Science in the USA, a variety of related online degrees can expand your career options. Many students look for the cheapest bachelor degree online options to reduce tuition costs and student debt while obtaining a recognized qualification.

For those interested in more technical roles or broadening their skill set, online colleges for engineering provide flexible pathways that can be combined with computer science expertise.

If you're aiming for advancement into management, consider the value of an MBA. Understanding online executive mba cost is important for making an informed decision about investing in your future.

Additionally, tech professionals in areas like data management or information services may benefit from an MLIS. Exploring mlis degree online cost can help you determine whether this specialized path aligns with your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Phillip Rogaway

Trending Scientists