World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip Kam-Tao Li

Philip Kam-Tao Li

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 100 8267 7774 93 89 595 37183

Philip Kam-Tao Li publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Philip Kam-Tao Li between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Philip Kam-Tao Li published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 14 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2021. 22 of the 631 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2021. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 5 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 23 publications 2002: 24 publications 2003: 32 publications 2004: 22 publications 2005: 32 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 36 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 11 publications
1981 2025

631 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Philip Kam-Tao Li: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 2
1990 1
1991 5
1992 8
1993 5
1994 8
1995 8
1996 11
1997 3
1998 3
1999 11
2000 14
2001 23
2002 24
2003 32
2004 22
2005 32
2006 15
2007 25
2008 20
2009 23
2010 26
2011 19
2012 25
2013 24
2014 17
2015 21
2016 18
2017 23
2018 15
2019 20
2020 24
2021 36
2022 21
2023 21
2024 11
2025 11
Total 631
Download as CSV

Philip Kam-Tao Li publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Kam-Tao Li sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 595 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 595
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Philip Kam-Tao Li D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Kam-Tao Li sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 100
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Philip Kam-Tao Li is affiliated with the Prince of Wales Hospital in China. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Nephrology. Their work spans various subfields, including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Renal and Vascular Pathologies
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Organ Donation and Transplantation
  • Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis

Philip Kam-Tao Li has published extensively in several journals. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Peritoneal Dialysis International
  • Kidney Medicine
  • Kidney International Reports
  • Kidney International
  • Nutrients

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Philip Kam-Tao Li include:

  • ISPD peritonitis guideline recommendations: 2022 update on prevention and treatment, 2022, Peritoneal Dialysis International
  • Patient-centred approaches for the management of unpleasant symptoms in kidney disease, 2022, Nature Reviews Nephrology
  • Establishing a Core Outcome Set for Peritoneal Dialysis: Report of the SONG-PD (Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Peritoneal Dialysis) Consensus Workshop, 2020, American Journal of Kidney Diseases
  • A meta-analysis of GFR slope as a surrogate endpoint for kidney failure, 2023, Nature Medicine
  • ISPD Catheter-related Infection Recommendations: 2023 Update, 2023, Peritoneal Dialysis International

Their work often involves collaboration, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
  • Vassilios Liakopoulos
  • Gamal Saadi
  • Ifeoma Ulasi
  • Sharon Andreoli

Best Publications

  • The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: Rationale, clinicopathological correlations, and classification

    Daniel C. Cattran;Rosanna Coppo;H. Terence Cook;John Feehally

  • PERITONEAL DIALYSIS-RELATED INFECTIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: 2010 UPDATE

    Philip Kam-Tao Li;Cheuk Chun Szeto;Beth Piraino;Judith Bernardini

  • Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2005 update

    Beth Piraino;George R. Bailie;Judith Bernardini;Elisabeth Boeschoten

  • ISPD PERITONITIS RECOMMENDATIONS: 2016 UPDATE ON PREVENTION AND TREATMENT

    Philip Kam-Tao Li;Cheuk Chun Szeto;Beth Piraino;Javier de Arteaga

  • The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: pathology definitions, correlations, and reproducibility

    Ian S.D. Roberts;H. Terence Cook;Stéphan Troyanov;Charles E. Alpers

  • Kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) glomerulonephritis work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis

    Daniel C. Cattran;John Feehally;H. Terence Cook;Zhi Hong Liu

  • Cardiac Valve Calcification as an Important Predictor for All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Mortality in Long-Term Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Prospective Study

    Angela Yee-Moon Wang;Mei Wang;Jean Woo;Christopher Wai-Kei Lam

  • KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors.

    Krista L. Lentine;Bertram L. Kasiske;Andrew S. Levey;Patricia L. Adams

  • Circulating endotoxemia: a novel factor in systemic inflammation and cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease.

    C. W. McIntyre;L. E. A. Harrison;M. T. Eldehni;H. J. Jefferies

  • Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis

    Philip Kam-Tao Li;Kai Ming Chow;Moniek W.M. Van de Luijtgaarden;David W. Johnson

  • Melamine Toxicity and the Kidney

    Anthony Kai-ching Hau;Tze Hoi Kwan;Philip Kam-tao Li

  • Associations of serum fetuin-A with malnutrition, inflammation, atherosclerosis and valvular calcification syndrome and outcome in peritoneal dialysis patients

    Angela Yee-Moon Wang;Jean Woo;Christopher Wai-Kei Lam;Mei Wang

  • Inflammation, residual kidney function, and cardiac hypertrophy are interrelated and combine adversely to enhance mortality and cardiovascular death risk of peritoneal dialysis patients

    Angela Yee-Moon Wang;Mei Wang;Jean Woo;Christopher Wai-Kei Lam

  • Membranous nephropathy related to hepatitis B virus in adults.

    Kar Neng Lai;Philip K.T. Li;Siu Fai Lui;Tak Cheong Au

  • Effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on residual renal function in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. A randomized, controlled study.

    Philip Kam-Tao Li;Kai-Ming Chow;Teresa Yuk-Hwa Wong;Chi-Bon Leung

  • ISPD Catheter-Related Infection Recommendations: 2017 Update.

    Cheuk-Chun Szeto;Philip Kam-Tao Li;David W. Johnson;Judith Bernardini

  • The natural history of immunoglobulin a nephropathy among patients with hematuria and minimal proteinuria

    Cheuk-Chun Szeto;Fernand Mac-Moune Lai;Ka-Fai To;Teresa Yuk-Hwa Wong

  • Summary of Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors.

    Krista L. Lentine;Bertram L. Kasiske;Andrew S. Levey;Patricia L. Adams

  • Is a Single Time Point C-Reactive Protein Predictive of Outcome in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients?

    Angela Yee-Moon Wang;Jean Woo;Christopher Wai-Kei Lam;Mei Wang

  • Importance of dialysis adequacy in mortality and morbidity of chinese CAPD patients.

    Cheuk-Chun Szeto;Teresa Yuk-Hwa Wong;Chi-Bon Leung;Angela Yee-Moon Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

Cheuk-Chun Szeto
Cheuk-Chun Szeto Chinese University of Hong Kong
Angela Yee-Moon Wang
Angela Yee-Moon Wang University of Hong Kong
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh University of California, Irvine
Christopher W.K. Lam
Christopher W.K. Lam Macau University of Science and Technology
Ka-Fai To
Ka-Fai To Chinese University of Hong Kong
Jean Woo
Jean Woo Chinese University of Hong Kong
Allison Tong
Allison Tong University of Sydney
Francesco Locatelli
Francesco Locatelli University of Pavia
Zhihong Liu
Zhihong Liu Nanjing University
John Feehally
John Feehally University of Leicester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in alternative routes or supplementary careers in health, there are several flexible options available online. Medical billing and coding is a sought-after field for those who want to work in the administrative side of healthcare. Many schools now offer financial aid for medical billing and coding programs, making this pathway more accessible and affordable.

Nursing remains a popular and rewarding profession. For students concerned about standardized testing, look for nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi exams. This can reduce barriers and streamline the admissions process.

If you’re interested in leadership and the organizational aspect of healthcare, consider pursuing a degree in healthcare administration. These accelerated programs are ideal for those wanting to move quickly into management roles within the medical sector.

For current registered nurses aiming to advance their qualifications, there are excellent opportunities to bridge from ASN to FNP through dedicated programs. Explore asn to fnp programs that can help you progress from an associate degree to a family nurse practitioner.

Best Scientists Citing Philip Kam-Tao Li

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles