Austrian School, Political economy, Politics, Positive economics and Public choice are his primary areas of study. His Austrian School study is concerned with the field of Neoclassical economics as a whole. The study incorporates disciplines such as Planned economy, Socialist mode of production and Communism, Socialism in addition to Political economy.
His study in Politics is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Credibility, Public finance, Theoretical psychology and Institutional analysis. His Heterodox economics study in the realm of Positive economics interacts with subjects such as Perspective. His Public choice research incorporates elements of Competition, Government failure, Constitutional law and Public good.
His primary areas of study are Political economy, Politics, Positive economics, Austrian School and Neoclassical economics. His Political economy study combines topics in areas such as International political economy, Communism, Government, Public choice and Democracy. His work is dedicated to discovering how Politics, Argument are connected with Classical liberalism and other disciplines.
The various areas that Peter J. Boettke examines in his Positive economics study include Social science and Schools of economic thought. His study in the field of Socialist calculation debate is also linked to topics like Context. His work on Neoclassical economics is being expanded to include thematically relevant topics such as Entrepreneurship.
His scientific interests lie mostly in Neoclassical economics, Politics, Political economy, Positive economics and Law and economics. The Distributive justice research Peter J. Boettke does as part of his general Neoclassical economics study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Economic Thought and Knight, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science. In his research on the topic of Politics, Economic history is strongly related with Public finance.
His Political economy study incorporates themes from Government, Public choice, Public policy, Property rights and Bourgeoisie. His biological study deals with issues like Austrian School, which deal with fields such as Coase theorem. His Law and economics research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Liberalism, Serfdom, Slippery slope and Institutional analysis.
His primary scientific interests are in Politics, Political economy, Positive economics, Neoclassical economics and Public choice. His Politics research includes themes of Competition, Public finance, Specialization and Argument. His research integrates issues of Government and Property rights in his study of Political economy.
He combines subjects such as Fiscal federalism, Austrian School, Constitutional economics, Free riding and Tiebout model with his study of Positive economics. Peter J. Boettke usually deals with Neoclassical economics and limits it to topics linked to Market socialism and Capital structure, Economic planning, Coordination failure, Capital good and Socialist calculation debate. His research in Public choice intersects with topics in Research program, Monetary policy, Public policy, Law and economics and Liberalism.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
Collectivist economic planning
Friedrich A. von Hayek;Peter J. Boettke.
(1935)
Institutional stickiness and the New Development Economics
Peter Boettke;Christopher Coyne;Peter Leeson.
Research Papers in Economics (2015)
Context Matters: Institutions and Entrepreneurship
Peter J. Boettke;Christopher J. Coyne.
(2009)
Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy
Peter J Boettke.
(2000)
Why perestroika failed
Peter J Boettke.
(1993)
Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School
Paul Dragos Aligica;Peter J. Boettke.
(2009)
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND DEVELOPMENT: CAUSE OR CONSEQUENCE?
Peter J Boettke;Christopher J Coyne.
Social Science Research Network (2003)
The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics
Peter J. Boettke.
(1994)
Where did economics go wrong? Modern economics as a flight from reality
Peter J. Boettke.
Critical Review (1997)
Information and Knowledge: Austrian Economics in Search of its Uniqueness
Peter J. Boettke.
The Review of Austrian Economics (2002)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:
George Mason University
Trinity College Dublin
Citadel
University of Southern California
University of Freiburg
Texas A&M University
Aarhus University
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
KU Leuven
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Harbin Institute of Technology
Predicine
University of Udine
University of Sussex
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
University of Bologna
University of Miami
Texas A&M University
University of Houston
Northwestern University
University of California, Los Angeles