World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
47
Citations
8287
World Ranking
1281
National Ranking
95

Peter Ashwin publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Ashwin sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 206 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Peter Ashwin D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Ashwin sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Ashwin is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple intersecting fields within computer science, with a focus on statistical and nonlinear physics. The breadth of their work extends to areas such as ecosystem dynamics and resilience, nonlinear dynamics and pattern formation, and neural dynamics and brain function.

The scientist has contributed to topics including stochastic dynamics and bifurcation, climate variability and models, neural networks and applications, and neural networks and reservoir computing. These areas reflect a multidisciplinary approach combining theoretical and applied aspects of complex systems and computational models.

Among recent scholarly contributions, notable publications include:

  • "Quantification and interpretation of the climate variability record" (2020) published in Global and Planetary Change
  • "Miro2 tethers the ER to mitochondria to promote mitochondrial fusion in tobacco leaf epidermal cells" (2020) published in Communications Biology
  • "Rate-induced tipping: thresholds, edge states and connecting orbits" (2023) published in Nonlinearity
  • "Physical invariant measures and tipping probabilities for chaotic attractors of asymptotically autonomous systems" (2021) published in The European Physical Journal Special Topics
  • "The echo index and multistability in input-driven recurrent neural networks" (2020) published in Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena

Peter Ashwin frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Anna S. von der Heydt
  • Claire Postlethwaite
  • Julian Newman
  • Ana Rodrigues
  • Niklas Boers

Their work appears regularly in established publication venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena
  • Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
  • SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems
  • Physical Review E

Best Publications

  • Bubbling of attractors and synchronisation of chaotic oscillators

    Peter Ashwin;Jorge Buescu;Ian Stewart

  • From attractor to chaotic saddle: a tale of transverse instability

    Peter Ashwin;Jorge Buescu;Ian Stewart

  • Mathematical Frameworks for Oscillatory Network Dynamics in Neuroscience

    Peter Ashwin;Stephen Coombes;Rachel Nicks

  • The Dynamics of n Weakly Coupled Identical Oscillators

    P. Ashwin;J. W. Swift

  • Weak chimeras in minimal networks of coupled phase oscillators

    Peter Ashwin;Oleksandr Burylko

  • Parameter shifts for nonautonomous systems in low dimension: Bifurcation- and Rate-induced tipping

    Peter Ashwin;Clare Perryman;Clare Perryman;Sebastian Wieczorek

  • Excitability in ramped systems: the compost-bomb instability

    Sebastian Wieczorek;Peter Ashwin;Catherine M. Luke;Peter M. Cox

  • Travelling fronts for the KPP equation with spatio-temporal delay

    P. Ashwin;M. V. Bartuccelli;T. J. Bridges;S. A. Gourley

  • Three identical oscillators with symmetric coupling

    P Ashwin;G P King;J W Swift

  • A phenomenological model of seizure initiation suggests network structure may explain seizure frequency in idiopathic generalised epilepsy

    Oscar Benjamin;Thomas H B Fitzgerald;Peter Ashwin;Krasimira Tsaneva-Atanasova

  • Chimera states in networks of phase oscillators: The case of two small populations

    Mark J. Panaggio;Daniel M. Abrams;Peter Ashwin;Carlo R. Laing

  • Dynamics of coupled cell networks: synchrony, heteroclinic cycles and inflation

    Manuela A. D. Aguiar;Peter Ashwin;Ana Paula S. Dias;Michael Field

  • Nonlinear dynamics: When instability makes sense

    Peter Ashwin;Marc Timme

  • Heteroclinic Networks in Coupled Cell Systems

    Peter Ashwin;Michael Field

  • Dynamics on Networks of Cluster States for Globally Coupled Phase Oscillators

    Peter Ashwin;Gábor Orosz;John Wordsworth;Stuart Townley

  • Calculation of the periodic spectral components in a chaotic DC-DC converter

    J.H.B. Deane;P. Ashwin;D.C. Hamill;D.J. Jefferies

  • Controlled and stochastic retention concentrates dynein at microtubule ends to keep endosomes on track

    Martin Schuster;Sreedhar Kilaru;Peter Ashwin;Congping Lin

  • On local attraction properties and a stability index for heteroclinic connections

    Olga Podvigina;Olga Podvigina;Peter Ashwin

  • Basin bifurcations, oscillatory instability and rate-induced thresholds for Atlantic meridional overturning circulation in a global oceanic box model

    Hassan Alkhayuon;Peter Ashwin;Laura C. Jackson;Courtney Quinn;Courtney Quinn

  • Hopf normal form with $S_N$ symmetry and reduction to systems of nonlinearly coupled phase oscillators

    Peter Ashwin;Ana Rodrigues

  • On the unfolding of a blowout bifurcation

    Peter Ashwin;Philip J. Aston;Matthew Nicol

  • On riddling and weak attractors

    Peter Ashwin;John R. Terry

  • Elliptic behaviour in the sawtooth standard map

    Peter Ashwin

Frequent Co-Authors

Gero Steinberg
Gero Steinberg University of Exeter
Ian Melbourne
Ian Melbourne University of Warwick
John R. Terry
John R. Terry University of Exeter
Marc Timme
Marc Timme TU Dresden
Anna von der Heydt
Anna von der Heydt Utrecht University
György Buzsáki
György Buzsáki New York University
Adeel Razi
Adeel Razi Monash University
Silvestro Micera
Silvestro Micera Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Alberto Priori
Alberto Priori University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Mathematics graduates often explore versatile career pathways that combine analytical skills with advanced education. Many professionals choose to enhance their qualifications with a 1 year mba to accelerate their career growth. These programs offer intensive training that bridges the gap between quantitative expertise and business acumen.

For those looking for more flexibility, several options allow the use of transfer credits for online MBA programs, making it easier to tailor education paths without losing progress. This is especially beneficial for working professionals balancing study with other commitments.

Additionally, a growing number of graduates pursue a masters in data analytics. This degree leverages mathematical foundations to extract insights from large datasets, opening doors to high-demand sectors such as finance, technology, and healthcare.

For students new to graduate business education or those seeking less competitive entry routes, exploring the easiest MBA programs can be a practical start. These programs often focus on accessibility and support, helping students build confidence while developing essential skills.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Ashwin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles